Skip to comments.
Gosnell Judge Reinstates Charge for Baby Tossed in Shoe Box, Still Breathing
Life News ^
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 04/24/2013 8:37:13 AM PDT by Morgana
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: Morgana
The purpose of the abortions was to kill the babies. If that didn’t work, they felt that they had the right to kill the babies.
Logically, they’re right. There is no difference between the baby before exiting the mother, and after. None.
Murder before and murder after.
As for the raging feminazis who are reading this and having a stroke, I say “tough.”
To: Morgana
I’ll quote CS Lewis.
You ARE a soul. You [currently] HAVE a body.
That soul can be seared to the point that you are not affected by the evil you’re doing. That soul is condemned.
22
posted on
04/24/2013 9:12:56 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Cicero
Wow... he looks like Gosnell, does he not?
23
posted on
04/24/2013 9:13:26 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: I want the USA back
Oh, some feminazis, when presented with the evidence that there is no difference pre-birth and post-birth,
will tell you that they’re now OK with infanticide.
After all, a live baby is a burden. They want that baby dead, and they demand that that baby be dead.
24
posted on
04/24/2013 9:14:48 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: TSgt
Mistrial doesn’t mean he’d be facing double jeopardy if tried again...does it?
To: Morgana
If the pro life movement is serious, they will NEVER let this horror go. EVERYTHING should be on billboards and wherever else “This is what CHOICE looks like” and “These mothers CHOSE poorly”
Forever. Until printers break and the net implodes.
To: HomeAtLast
27
posted on
04/24/2013 9:17:20 AM PDT
by
sport
To: MrB
Sorry, I guess that is Gosnell. When I searched the photo, it said it was the judge. Bit of confusion in the search program, I guess.
28
posted on
04/24/2013 9:22:56 AM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Morgana
I actually asked my Priest the other day if Gosnell was soulless. My Priest assured me that Gosnell had a soul so I believe him, however I have no idea what Gosnell did with it. He has a soul. All human monsters have souls. However, they are so heavily and thoroughly calloused as to be practically impervious to any promptings from a higher spirit.
29
posted on
04/24/2013 9:24:37 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
To: MrB; Cicero
That's Judge Minehart, on the right:
30
posted on
04/24/2013 9:25:50 AM PDT
by
Deo volente
(God willing, America shall survive this Obamanation.)
To: Morgana
He has the empathy of homo ergaster ~ as is the case with all too many people.
It's probably a sign that we still have a companion species living with us that's never going to achieve human status.
31
posted on
04/24/2013 9:26:32 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Cicero
That’s Gosnell, isn’t it?
32
posted on
04/24/2013 9:28:09 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
(Some taglines never go away....)
To: Cicero
I thought the resemblance was remarkable.
33
posted on
04/24/2013 9:28:22 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: HomeAtLast
34
posted on
04/24/2013 9:28:55 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
(Some taglines never go away....)
To: Morgana
To: Theodore R.
Its not just Philly people. I once had a female boss who supported abortion. She said “there are too many people in the world” which I took as an admission that babies are people but she just didn’t care.
36
posted on
04/24/2013 9:33:16 AM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do ithat when I have a fire.)
To: Morgana
I read all these articles and just cry, how can these same people always use the "children" to make every argument for more government? "We must have a new law to protect the children" always. But 5 and 6 pound babies having their spinal cords cut while writhing in pain is fine, no problem, it is about choice you see? Choice for you Christians to keep your down syndrome baby no, choice for you citizens to eat what you want, no, choice for you men to have a say in what happens to YOUR unborn child, no, no, no choice for you!!
This country is in so much trouble with God Almighty, how much longer must we endure this murderous, evil, reprobate society?
37
posted on
04/24/2013 9:35:54 AM PDT
by
thirst4truth
(www.Believer.com)
To: thirst4truth
Summed up in one word - “Maranatha”
38
posted on
04/24/2013 9:36:29 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Morgana
McMahon claims no babies were ever killed in the gruesome abortion process, which involved snipping the spinal cords of the children by jabbing medical scissors into the backs of their necks, because the babies were supposedly already dead.
If the babies were already “dead” as Gosnell’s attorneys claim; what would be the purpose to take the extra steps to snipping their spinal cords?
39
posted on
04/24/2013 9:37:30 AM PDT
by
Wisconsinlady
(If babies had guns, they wouldn't be aborted)
To: ScottinVA
I would vote for snipping his spinal cord but only if it left him paralyzed. And then feed him abortion incuding drugs and dip him in saline solution.
40
posted on
04/24/2013 9:39:05 AM PDT
by
Wisconsinlady
(If babies had guns, they wouldn't be aborted)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson