Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gosnell Judge Reinstates Charge for Baby Tossed in Shoe Box, Still Breathing
Life News ^ | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 04/24/2013 8:37:13 AM PDT by Morgana

The judge in the Kermit Gosnell murder trial admitted today he made an error when dropping one of the charges against the abortion practitioner.

Common pleas court Judge Jeffrey Minehart admitted he “erred” when dropping the murder charge for Baby C, who was killed in an abortion-infanticide when he was a victim of an attempted abortion but was born alive and tossed in a shoe box, with Gosnell staffers confirming they saw him breathing for 20 minutes.

Gosnell faces eight total murder counts — one for killing a woman in a botched abortion and seven for killing babies in abortion-infanticides that involved live-birth abortions and snipping their necks after birth. The judge received heavy criticism yesterday for dropping three of the murder charges.

Gosnell’s defense attorney asked the judge to drop three of the charges for killing the babies and the judge agreed with the contention there was not enough evidence to convict Gosnell on those charges. Another charge of infanticide was also dropped. He still faces the other charges the prosecution has brought and the murder trial will continue on them.

One of the three charges the judge dropped includes a 28-week unborn baby who was killed in an abortion-infanticide and eventually discovered in a freezer at Gosnell’s clinic. Another involved “Baby B,” about whom a Gosnell staffer testified was a newborn child who survived a failed abortion and was still breathing into a shoe box.

The third murder charge thrown out was for “Baby G,” who was the subject of testimony of a former Gosnell staff who, in the grand jury report, said he saw alive. Steven Massoff said he saw exhibit “a respiratory excursion,” meaning a breath.

The reinstated charge involves Baby C — about whom a Gosnell staffer testified was a newborn child who survived a failed abortion and was still breathing into a shoe box.

During this morning’s trial hearing, Judge Minehart also dismissed murder charges regarding”Baby F,” who was seen by Gosnell staffers making a single leg movement after birth and before Gosnell employees snipped the infant’s neck.

Kareema Cross told the jury she saw at least 10 children who were breathing after botched abortions but killed afterwards. What happened shocked her so badly she took photographs to document what happened. Cross took pictures to document filth in the abortion clinic and a picture of a huge baby boy tossed in shoe box breathing, moving, and too big for the box. Cross testified of large babies birthed, moving, and moaning some for 20 min before their necks were snipped.

Gosnell gave the unborn children digoxin not to kill baby but slow heart, Cross said. Gosnell’s attorney claims the drug killed the unborn children before birth and before he snipped their necks.

But one pro-life advocate who has been following the trial closely says the charge should not have been dismissed.

“I am shocked that these counts have been dismissed. I have heard testimony by very credible witnesses to the effect that these babies were murdered in cold blood by Gosnell as they cried and struggled for life. We pray that justice will be done in the remaining five victims of Gosnell’s horrific slayings,” said Cheryl Sullenger, Senior Policy Advisor for Operation Rescue, who has observed the trial and published first-hand accounts of the proceedings.

Sullenger said testimony from the medical examiner and toxicologist has indicated that there was no evidence the babies were injected with Digoxin to ensure the babies were dead prior to the abortion, as the defense has claimed.

The medical examiner testified that tests were inconclusive as proof that the babies were born alive. However, the tests also did not prove the babies were dead prior to birth. Those inconclusive test results were overshadowed by the weight of testimony from witness after witness, who detailed how the babies were in fact living prior to being murdered through what one witness described as a “virtual beheading.”

“If Gosnell gets off scot-free, that will send a message that murdering live babies and abortion patients is now acceptable behavior in America and that abortionists who engage in such depraved practices are above the law. This would put women and babies in grave danger – more than they already face – at abortion clinics throughout the nation,” said Sullenger.

From the testimony Cross gave during the trial:

In the final day of the prosecution of former abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, a former staffer testified that she saw at least 10 babies breathing, which were delivered at Gosnell’s West Philadelphia clinic, before Gosnell or another staffer ended their lives by cutting their spinal cord with scissors.

Kareema Cross told a jury that she was so unnerved by this and other things she saw at Gosnell’s West Philadelphia clinic between 2005 and 2009 that she took pictures to document the filthy conditions.

Cross, under questioning from Assistant District Attorney Joanne Pescatore, told the jury she saw at least 10 to 25 instances where babies – delivered by abortion patients after receiving labor-inducing drugs – were breathing and vividly recalled a few instances where she saw movement.

In another instance, Cross recalled when Lynda Williams, a Gosnell staffer who lived in Delaware, had a child that had been delivered by a patient and saw it breathe. “The chest was going up and down” she said.

“Lynda pulled its hand and the baby pulled the arm back,” she said, adding a short time later Williams flipped the child over and “snipped” the spinal cord with a pair of scissors.

Williams, in her testimony earlier this month, testified only that she saw the baby’s arm “jump” when she cut the spinal cord.

On a different occasion, Cross said she heard a baby cry out. She said a co-worker who heard it first came to get her and she listened at the door, where the baby’s body was, and heard “mmm…. A whine, a soft whine, once.”

During the trial Gosnell’s defense lawyer, Jack McMahon, claims none of the babies were born alive who Gosnell killed in abortion-infanticide procedures but were dead before birth due to a lethal drug injection and that Gosnell and his staff “snipped” their necks after “birth.” McMahon claims no babies were ever killed in the gruesome abortion process, which involved “snipping” the spinal cords of the children by jabbing medical scissors into the backs of their necks, because the babies were supposedly already dead.

That’s not what two staffers for Gosnell admitted in court — with one saying she heard a baby scream and another saying the baby “jumped” when the newborn was stabbed in the neck with the scissors.

McMahon is attempting to get the jury to buy a story that Gosnell used a drug called Digoxin to kill the baby in utero and then to deliver a dead child. He claims Gosnell just wanted to “snip” the spinal cords to ensure the baby was dead already. The Gosnell staffer admitted that’s what the abortion practitioner told her he was doing.

Although the defense attorney claimed the babies were dead and that jabbing them in the neck with scissors was needed to make sure that was the case, Gosnell staffers also told the court one at least two occasions that the babies were not dead when their necks were stabbed.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: abortion; gosnell; infanticide; prolife; trial
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

1 posted on 04/24/2013 8:37:13 AM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

God help us.


2 posted on 04/24/2013 8:40:24 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear..."(Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

The more I hear of this monster, the sicker I get.


3 posted on 04/24/2013 8:42:52 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

God help us.

He is, He is showing use the true face of “Choice”...


4 posted on 04/24/2013 8:43:10 AM PDT by Rumplemeyer (The GOP should stand its ground - and fix Bayonets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Is Gosnell alive? I mean we see him breathing, but how do we know that it is not just the “last involuntary movements before death”, as his attorney stated. Can we snip his spine to find out?


5 posted on 04/24/2013 8:44:37 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

I keep thinking of the people of Philadelphia many of whom support these horrid practices in the name of “sexual freedom”.


6 posted on 04/24/2013 8:45:27 AM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I actually asked my Priest the other day if Gosnell was soulless. My Priest assured me that Gosnell had a soul so I believe him, however I have no idea what Gosnell did with it.


7 posted on 04/24/2013 8:46:47 AM PDT by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Right. Because the natural thing to do when faced with a breathing newborn baby is to toss it in a shoebox until it stops.

I think I'm going to be sick.
8 posted on 04/24/2013 8:47:53 AM PDT by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

For them, there will also be a day of reckoning.


9 posted on 04/24/2013 8:51:12 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Sanity prevails. Thanks be to God.

What on earth was this judge thinking?!

10 posted on 04/24/2013 8:51:22 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Everyone has/is a soul but someone like Gosnell is most certainly a spiritually dead soul.

As Jesus said, they are dead while they live.

The walking dead (spiritually).


11 posted on 04/24/2013 8:53:20 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear..."(Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
Common pleas court Judge Jeffrey Minehart admitted he “erred” when dropping the murder charge for Baby C, who was killed in an abortion-infanticide when he was a victim of an attempted abortion but was born alive and tossed in a shoe box, with Gosnell staffers confirming they saw him breathing for 20 minutes.

What gave it away, Judge?

12 posted on 04/24/2013 8:53:33 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (July 4, 1776: Declaration of Independence. Nov 6, 2012: Declaration of Dependence. R.I.P. America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“Reinstates” charge?? IANAL but is this irregular enough to let him get scot free?


13 posted on 04/24/2013 8:55:09 AM PDT by HomeAtLast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Obama supports Gosnell. This is what Obama supported while in the Illinois senate. In a very specific instance when a baby is born alive Obama voiced his opposition, repeatedly, to the baby receiving any medical attention.

Want’s to make sure that his daughters, and others, if they make a mistake, aren’t “punished with a baby”.


14 posted on 04/24/2013 8:56:48 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear..."(Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Gosnell is not the only one doing this by far. He’s just the one who got caught.

And Barry Sotereo refused to vote to make this illegal in IL.


15 posted on 04/24/2013 9:00:41 AM PDT by wonkowasright (Wonko from outside the asylum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Can’t we just shoot that em-effer through the head and be done with it?


16 posted on 04/24/2013 9:04:08 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: HomeAtLast

Expect a mistrial to be called.


18 posted on 04/24/2013 9:05:23 AM PDT by TSgt (More Scott Roeders and fewer Tillers and Gosnells)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

It doesn’t get more extreme than a president who had a problem with the following text:

1 AN ACT concerning infants who are born alive.

2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
3 represented in the General Assembly:

4 Section 5. The Statute on Statutes is amended by adding
5 Section 1.36 as follows:

6 (5 ILCS 70/1.36 new)
7 Sec. 1.36. Born-alive infant.
8 (a) In determining the meaning of any statute or of any
9 rule, regulation, or interpretation of the various
10 administrative agencies of this State, the words “person”,
11 “human being”, “child”, and “individual” include every infant
12 member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any
13 stage of development.
14 (b) As used in this Section, the term “born alive”, with
15 respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the
16 complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of that
17 member, at any stage of development, who after that expulsion
18 or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of
19 the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary
20 muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been
21 cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction
22 occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean
23 section, or induced abortion.
24 (c) A live child born as a result of an abortion shall be
25 fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate
26 protection under the law.

27 Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
28 becoming law.


19 posted on 04/24/2013 9:10:19 AM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Stuff this bass-turd into a shoebox for the rest of his life and see how he likes it.


20 posted on 04/24/2013 9:10:44 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

The purpose of the abortions was to kill the babies. If that didn’t work, they felt that they had the right to kill the babies.

Logically, they’re right. There is no difference between the baby before exiting the mother, and after. None.

Murder before and murder after.

As for the raging feminazis who are reading this and having a stroke, I say “tough.”


21 posted on 04/24/2013 9:12:27 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Pi$$ed off yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I’ll quote CS Lewis.

You ARE a soul. You [currently] HAVE a body.

That soul can be seared to the point that you are not affected by the evil you’re doing. That soul is condemned.


22 posted on 04/24/2013 9:12:56 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Wow... he looks like Gosnell, does he not?


23 posted on 04/24/2013 9:13:26 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Oh, some feminazis, when presented with the evidence that there is no difference pre-birth and post-birth,

will tell you that they’re now OK with infanticide.

After all, a live baby is a burden. They want that baby dead, and they demand that that baby be dead.


24 posted on 04/24/2013 9:14:48 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TSgt

Mistrial doesn’t mean he’d be facing double jeopardy if tried again...does it?


25 posted on 04/24/2013 9:14:59 AM PDT by HomeAtLast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If the pro life movement is serious, they will NEVER let this horror go. EVERYTHING should be on billboards and wherever else “This is what CHOICE looks like” and “These mothers CHOSE poorly”

Forever. Until printers break and the net implodes.


26 posted on 04/24/2013 9:15:54 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HomeAtLast

Not in Florida.


27 posted on 04/24/2013 9:17:20 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Sorry, I guess that is Gosnell. When I searched the photo, it said it was the judge. Bit of confusion in the search program, I guess.


28 posted on 04/24/2013 9:22:56 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
I actually asked my Priest the other day if Gosnell was soulless. My Priest assured me that Gosnell had a soul so I believe him, however I have no idea what Gosnell did with it.

He has a soul. All human monsters have souls. However, they are so heavily and thoroughly calloused as to be practically impervious to any promptings from a higher spirit.

29 posted on 04/24/2013 9:24:37 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MrB; Cicero
That's Judge Minehart, on the right:


30 posted on 04/24/2013 9:25:50 AM PDT by Deo volente (God willing, America shall survive this Obamanation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
He has the empathy of homo ergaster ~ as is the case with all too many people.

It's probably a sign that we still have a companion species living with us that's never going to achieve human status.

31 posted on 04/24/2013 9:26:32 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

That’s Gosnell, isn’t it?


32 posted on 04/24/2013 9:28:09 AM PDT by pgkdan (Some taglines never go away....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

I thought the resemblance was remarkable.


33 posted on 04/24/2013 9:28:22 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HomeAtLast

No.


34 posted on 04/24/2013 9:28:55 AM PDT by pgkdan (Some taglines never go away....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

double jeopardy?


35 posted on 04/24/2013 9:32:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Its not just Philly people. I once had a female boss who supported abortion. She said “there are too many people in the world” which I took as an admission that babies are people but she just didn’t care.


36 posted on 04/24/2013 9:33:16 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do ithat when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
I read all these articles and just cry, how can these same people always use the "children" to make every argument for more government? "We must have a new law to protect the children" always. But 5 and 6 pound babies having their spinal cords cut while writhing in pain is fine, no problem, it is about choice you see? Choice for you Christians to keep your down syndrome baby no, choice for you citizens to eat what you want, no, choice for you men to have a say in what happens to YOUR unborn child, no, no, no choice for you!!

This country is in so much trouble with God Almighty, how much longer must we endure this murderous, evil, reprobate society?

37 posted on 04/24/2013 9:35:54 AM PDT by thirst4truth (www.Believer.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thirst4truth

Summed up in one word - “Maranatha”


38 posted on 04/24/2013 9:36:29 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

McMahon claims no babies were ever killed in the gruesome abortion process, which involved “snipping” the spinal cords of the children by jabbing medical scissors into the backs of their necks, because the babies were supposedly already dead.

If the babies were already “dead” as Gosnell’s attorneys claim; what would be the purpose to take the extra steps to snipping their spinal cords?


39 posted on 04/24/2013 9:37:30 AM PDT by Wisconsinlady (If babies had guns, they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

I would vote for snipping his spinal cord but only if it left him paralyzed. And then feed him abortion incuding drugs and dip him in saline solution.


40 posted on 04/24/2013 9:39:05 AM PDT by Wisconsinlady (If babies had guns, they wouldn't be aborted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Morgana; sickoflibs
McMahon is attempting to get the jury to buy a story that Gosnell used a drug called Digoxin to kill the baby in utero and then to deliver a dead child. He claims Gosnell just wanted to “snip” the spinal cords to ensure the baby was dead already.

daaaayuuum...Im no lawyer scum sucking bottom dweller, and dont even wish to play one on tv, but this *defense* would seem to indicate that the *dr* readily admits that most, if not all of this living humans, were possibly still alive after delivery...

ole kermit will get to be satans bitch forever...

41 posted on 04/24/2013 9:45:17 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Only because he got slapped down by the public and he wants to be re-elected.


42 posted on 04/24/2013 9:46:16 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady

No, I want him and I know many others that would as well. God help me but I truly believe I could deliver pain to this individual and like it.


43 posted on 04/24/2013 9:47:56 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This is an example of the love of money corrupting an individual.


44 posted on 04/24/2013 9:49:03 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Gosnell and his staff “snipped” their necks after “birth.
Remindes me of an old Geman doctor.


45 posted on 04/24/2013 10:07:18 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

BUMP


46 posted on 04/24/2013 10:33:23 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz
Gosnell and his staff “snipped” their necks after “birth.

Premeditated Murder on a mass scale.

47 posted on 04/24/2013 10:36:58 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz; RedMDer; All

I admit I only heard of this case recently, but I just read a pretty comprehensive piece on this story(complete with pictures which there are no words to describe).

And I gotta say that even after a solid week of reading about the Boston bombings(and watching/listening to a lot of the coverage live), this story has troubled me even more than the bombings.

While I was reading the story of what this guy did, I had feelings of absolute disgust and contempt that I’m not sure I’ve ever felt before.

The total disregard for human life that this guy(are they really calling him a doctor?.. unbelievable) and his ‘assistant’ have shown and the utterly callous nature in which they acted, is something I never thought I’d read about happening in this country.

The realization of my naivety is a smack in the face, especially when recognizing that there are hundreds of these abortion/death factories spread throughout this country where similar ‘measures’ are undoubtedly used.

Vaduz, you are correct. This guy, Gosnell, his assistants who helped him, and all the other abortionists across the country who undertake these sick actions, would’ve no doubt excelled under the tutelage of Josef Mengele.

Can we please get rid of this evil from the face of earth? No taxpayer funded jail cells, get RID of this scum, he is not human.


48 posted on 04/24/2013 10:42:29 AM PDT by fiftymegaton (God Bless and Protect America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It’s really hard to show compassion to your fellow man when pure evil is staring back at you. This guy deserves a special spot in Hell for the sickening horrors he has committed.


49 posted on 04/24/2013 10:47:26 AM PDT by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fiftymegaton; Vaduz

A spokesperson from Planned Parenthood testifing before congress was asked about about the policy in the case of a ‘failed’ abortion.

She replied that it would be up to the patient. To his credit, the Congressman pointed out that the baby on the table was now the patient. The spokesperson never saw that coming.

These people are pure evil.


50 posted on 04/24/2013 10:47:28 AM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson