Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; GeronL

If you picked all jurors that are pro-life, the man is doomed from the get go. Regardless of testimony and evidence.

Because as you said “He is guilty”. I agree. But unfortunately, he has the right to due process.


30 posted on 04/23/2013 10:56:26 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomStar3028

they keep saying this trial is not about abortion, but yet they know they are lying when they do things like this.

His “due process” means engineering a jury who is going to let him walk?


31 posted on 04/23/2013 11:00:03 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: FreedomStar3028; GeronL; xzins

Due process does not guarantee you a jury of people who think that killing children is not wrong. By eliminating all pro life jurors you now have a jury of people who are immune from recognizing murder. He was not on trial for doing legal abortions. He was on trial for murdering babies who survived his abortions.

It was absolutely wrong to dismiss any juror who opposed abortion because he was not on trial for doing abortions. The judge should have required the defense to use up their pre-empts if they didn’t want pro lifers on the jury.


33 posted on 04/23/2013 11:15:59 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson