Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomStar3028

they keep saying this trial is not about abortion, but yet they know they are lying when they do things like this.

His “due process” means engineering a jury who is going to let him walk?


31 posted on 04/23/2013 11:00:03 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

All of the evidence that I’ve heard makes him guilty.

We all know he is an abortionist.

He killed babies that survived the first attempt at murder.

I cannot explain my outrage and disgust for this man in words.

The source just said they asked the questions, if you answered pro-choice were you allowed on the jury? If so, then yes, it’s jury engineering.

I was commenting that the jury should be filled with people that have never given it much thought. So they aren’t biased either way. That way, they can focus on the charges, regardless of how they feel about abortion.


32 posted on 04/23/2013 11:05:55 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson