Posted on 04/09/2013 9:59:18 AM PDT by Lazamataz
It has long been observed that you can usually tell what a Democrat is up to, generally, by what they accuse the opposition of specifically doing. This phenomenon is much more clearly manifested in Obama -- so much so, that you might be able to write a predictive activity log for him, simply by seeing what he accuses Republicans of doing.
On April 9th, it was reported that Obama accused the Republicans of using 'political stunts' to block gun control. Wait... what? Where did he make this accusation? Near Sandy Hook, Connecticut. What did he do the day before? Used Air Force One to fly relatives of Sandy Hook victims to DC to lobby for gun control. Most of us can clearly see that these are two political stunts intended to further gun control.
On April 7th, the Administration announced that the GOP must stop the "My Way or the Highway" approach to budget negotiations. Wait... what? Was this a statement issued from the man who found it unacceptable to cut two percent in the rate-of-growth of the budget?
Furthermore, concerning that issue: Obama made the rounds, repeatedly declaring that Republicans were responsible for Sequestration. Wait... what? As Bob Woodward eloquently laid out, Obama created the concept of the sequestration with the help of Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew and White House congressional relations chief Rob Nabors.
On February 19, 2013, Obama stated that 'It seems like every 3 months around here, there's some manufactured crisis'. Wait... what? As shown above, didn't Obama CREATE the sequestration? Didn't his operatives direct, in an email, that it should hurt? Didn't he CREATE the conditions that allowed the Muslim Brotherhood to take over in Egypt and Libya? Didn't he (unsuccessfully) attempt to create a crisis in Mexico by importing large amounts of firearms to Mexican drug cartels, in a jaded and cynical attempt to drum up support for gun control? Didn't Obamacare CREATE the pending crisis in health care insurance?
It becomes immediate apparent to even the most casual observer that when Obama accuses anyone of anything, he is in the very midst of the behavior he criticizes. This makes two things clear: One, that he is fully aware that the behavior he is engaging in is wrong, and two, that an international opponent could easily determine Obama's direction by what he accuses foreign nations of doing.
And that second point, my dear readers, is a breach of our security.
I luv ya Laz. We've been friends ever since we rode the short bus to school every day.
Serious is good, Laz my darling. You have a sharp, politically savvy mind, and you should put it to good use.
Nope. Ain't gonna concur with this one. Thanks again.
He may be a bad poker player, and a dangerous one at that, but he may also quite simply be spending so much time bouncing around from vacation to photo op that he has no clue what is really going on, no time to pay attention (ie Benghazi,) and no time - or perhaps inclination - to get some perspective on things from time to time. I’m not so sure Obama is evil, but I am quite sure he does evil things (I always think of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act,) and certain he is not up to this job. In essence, he is a very ineffective President. (Thank goodness!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.