To: Sub-Driver
BUT...But...but won't that make the island tip over???
2 posted on
04/03/2013 1:41:20 PM PDT by
Kartographer
("We mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.")
To: Sub-Driver
Anything to keep the fire going.
3 posted on
04/03/2013 1:43:11 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: Sub-Driver
Why woulsn’t we already have a missile defense system in the Pacicific? Our enemies know for sure that we don’t have one there right now.
9 posted on
04/03/2013 1:58:24 PM PDT by
Terry Mross
(This country will fail to exist in my lifetime. And I'm gettin' up there in age.)
To: Sub-Driver
sounds like a good idea, so it probably won’t happen
10 posted on
04/03/2013 2:00:32 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: Sub-Driver
To: Sub-Driver
This whole NKorea thing seems laughable and nothing more than a new leader trying to talk tough. At the same time though, under Obama’s watch, I wouldn’t be surprised if they actually pulled off some of the threats they are making, the latest being to nuke the hell out of us. It just seems like if we had a president who A: didnt hate our country and B: had some balls this wouldn’t be happening.
12 posted on
04/03/2013 2:11:28 PM PDT by
eak3
To: Sub-Driver
Drudge has on his headlines now...
NKOREA APPROVES 'MERCILESS' NUKE ATTACK ON US"
We have nothing to worry about though, Obama is on it....
13 posted on
04/03/2013 2:22:08 PM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
To: Sub-Driver
I wonder if the NK is the real reason - or is there more we are not told...
20 posted on
04/03/2013 3:07:38 PM PDT by
traumer
To: Sub-Driver
But I thought the Democrats were against the idea of missile defense?!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson