Posted on 03/27/2013 7:42:12 PM PDT by Lakeshark
Not long ago Politico’s Maggie Haberman ran an anti-Palin opinion piece masquerading as news analysis, Sarah Palin’s next act: Candidate or ‘Kardashian’?
I addressed that false choice in my post, Politico’s next act: Real News Organization or Gawker (no offense to Gawker), noting that Palin had backed numerous successful Republican rising stars:
It’s hard for Politico to fathom, but maybe candidate or Kardashian are not the only options.
Now Palin is back gearing up for 2014 to play a similar role as in 2010 and 2012, getting conservatives elected. And helping people shake off the malaise.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
:-)
Ping, Jacobson gets it. She’s gearing up. I hear she’s hired some FR guy to make sammiches for her.......
Well, the author does mention 'mayonaise'.
My girl crush continues to grow.
She's hardly perfect, but I don't know anyone better for representing conservatism in the political arena.
Oops, forgot, great video to watch at the link above.
Ping your list, the video at the link is great. She’s reloaded for 2014.
I think some of them do not want her to be our leader because she is Young pretty woman. I say it’s time for a shake up and new blood. You need a younger person as her to reach the younger voters. The media cannot destroy her. She is like teflon and just keeps coming. She has 3 million people following her alone on facebook. I’d love to see her running. She would sap the oxygen out of all other in house candidates. I respect her since she investigated both parties for cronyism while she was governor. She’s awesome in my book. If we want her, we could protect her from the media or the one that we all agree on. We don”t have many picks. We have to get it right the next time. Me, I’d pick her in a heartbeat.
We'll have to see what 2016 brings us, right now the bear is growling for 2014.
Those Stupid Republicans won't know what hit them.
That fact alone is bump worthy.
BUMP!!!
Palin simply was not acceptable to the “Ruling Class.” They wanted Romney in 2008. McCain did not, does not like Romney and chose the wild card. Despite her mistakes she did fine, better than McCain. She hoped that the Tea Party would be strong enough for her to make a run for the nomination, The Establishment, had picked its man, even though his shortcomings as a candidate were painfully obvious. They were sure that Obama would lose in 2012, but they underestimated him. Though they had a ton of money, they could not compete with his organization. Romney showed up Obama in the first debate, but then his backers caused him to back off. Romney fought hard for the nomination but then conducted the same “laid back” campaigns that lost in 1992, 1996, and 1908 and barely won in 2000. The victory in 2004 owed more to the Swift-boaters who exposed Kerry. Yet in 2012, the donor class put 300 million in the hands of the same incompetent advisers.
Palin actually DID go for a ride at the Reagan Ranch - not sure if the photo(shopped) with her on the horse is from that ride though. A snippet from a much longer, and well written account of Palin’s visit to the ranch:
Governor Palin and her family spent hours at the Ranch on Friday. .... After touring the grounds, Governor Palin even mounted a horse—confident in the saddle—and road the very same trails the President loved with Agent Barletta. She had asked if it would be possible to ride, wanting to experience the Ranch as Ronald Reagan did.
Though it was clear the Governor enjoyed the experience, it was also clear that this was not just for her — this was an opportunity for her to share the life of her hero with her family. It was a way for her to impart her values, those she shares with Ronald Reagan, with Bristol, Willow, Trig, and Tripp, just as our organization does for hundreds of young people every year as they visit and are inspired by their opportunity to “meet” Ronald Reagan at his Ranch.
Go Sarah Go
Now that the Obama Administration is refusing to pay for some Radiology Tests for Medicare Patients, I wonder of the naysayers will admit that Sarah Palin was 100% correct when she used the Death Panel analogy when talking about Obamacare.
And so it begins...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.