Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh Mocks 'Brainiac' GOP Consultants over Pat Caddell's CPAC Rant
Breitbart ^
| 3/15/13
| Tony Lee
Posted on 03/15/2013 5:34:16 PM PDT by Nachum
On Friday, conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh praised Pat Caddell, the frustrated Democrat who has often spoken out against the political establishment, for his thunderous speech at CPAC on Thursday condemning the Republican consultant class.
Caddell accused GOP consultants of caring more about money than winning elections or principles and engaging in acts that could border on racketeering.
Limbaugh said Caddell "launched both barrels at CPAC" and let the Republican consultant class "have it" while blowing "the lid off of CPAC" with what Limbaugh described was a message that "the Republican consultant class is taking the party down the tubes, that they're making filthy amounts of money--$150 million a campaign--whether the candidate wins or loses."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brainiac; caddell; cpac; gop; limbaugh; mocks; patcaddell; rant; rush; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
03/15/2013 5:34:16 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
...something the average FReep knew 4 months ago
2
posted on
03/15/2013 5:37:10 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Nachum
I can’t find a video of Pat’s presentation, didn’t anyone make one?
3
posted on
03/15/2013 5:54:51 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
I cant find a video of Pats presentation, didnt anyone make one?Rush tried to find one but was unable to. Maybe he'll find one over the weekend. If not, I suspect a rat of the GOPe species.
4
posted on
03/15/2013 5:57:15 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Fighting Obama without Boehner & McConnell is like going deer hunting without your accordion)
To: Doogle
at least 4 months ago.
Many knew well over ten years ago.
Since most of us all know now, what are “we” going to do about it?
Either the GOP does a purge (unlikely) or conservatives and independents gather together and create an autonomous new third party.
Again.
5
posted on
03/15/2013 6:09:11 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
(The obvious takes longer to discover for the obtuse.)
To: Nachum
Remember how excited people here got about Nicole Wallace dumping on Palin right after she lost? This is a business to them, not a political battler for hearts and minds. They always have been more concerned about the next paycheck than the candidates they purportedly represent. Just like lobbyists, no one really thinks they give a crap about the companies they lobby for do they? It’s just a job and these people are on the same rung of the ladder as whores, just not as honest about it.
6
posted on
03/15/2013 6:14:47 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: Nachum
In comparing Republicans unfavorably to Democrats, Caddell said: In my party we play to win. We play for life and death. You people play for a different kind of agenda
Your party has no problem playing the Washington Generals to the Harlem Globetrotters.
7
posted on
03/15/2013 6:15:36 PM PDT
by
swamprebel
(a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
To: sarasmom
When you have the Chief of Staff of the Republican National Committee and the political director of the Romney campaign, and their two companies get $150 million at the end of the campaign for the fantastic get-out-the-vote program
some of this borders on RICO [the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act] violations, Caddell told attendees.
8
posted on
03/15/2013 6:16:40 PM PDT
by
swamprebel
(a Constitution once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.)
To: Nachum
There ought to be a free market component to campaign consultants. If I were running for office, I’d want to hire known winners—losers need not apply.
9
posted on
03/15/2013 6:18:45 PM PDT
by
Conservativegreatgrandma
(The perfect is the enemy of the good..............Voltaire)
To: Nachum
I agree with Caddell and Rush. Spot on critiques. Too many GOP consultants are more interested in money than in fighting a smart fight. Just look at Karl Rove and you’ll know what I mean.
“Time for some new blood” - Dracula
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
The democratic machine is all in and not for the money. There’s about six metrosexual pussy consultants that f up the campaigns every friggin time. Who’s that balding pussy with the funny glasses showing up on MTP acting like a republican conultant? Fire him first.
11
posted on
03/15/2013 6:46:50 PM PDT
by
Thebaddog
(Obama won, we are so screwed.)
To: sarasmom
> Either the GOP does a purge (unlikely) or conservatives and independents gather together and create an autonomous new third party.
Why don’t conservatives just elect conservative candidates in the Republican primaries? Then they can hire whomever they please.
12
posted on
03/15/2013 7:01:20 PM PDT
by
GJones2
(Political consultants)
To: GJones2
LOL!
Because, as we should all be able to see clearly now, Republicans treat conservatives like Democrats treat special interest minority groups.
None of us are individually or collectively considered free citizens who elect our government representatives.
We citizens are all just a vast distasteful group of ignorant pawns deemed the “public”, by our elected “leaders”, and their highly paid staffs, who are forced to pretend to deal with, during periodic election cycles.
13
posted on
03/15/2013 7:24:12 PM PDT
by
sarasmom
(The obvious takes longer to discover for the obtuse.)
To: GJones2
Why dont conservatives just elect conservative candidates in the Republican primaries? Then they can hire whomever they please. One of the interesting allegations Cadell made, is that the party apparatus won't give money to the candidate who doesn't hire one of their consultants. So don't ever contribute any money to the GOP, instead give it directly to the candidate.
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
"There ought to be a free market component to campaign consultants." In every market there are supply chain alternatives if the decision makers aren't on-the-take.
Decisions for team players start at the top - not with the bottom feeders or even purveyors of money. The GOP-e(stablishment) should be GOP-e(nd-of-control).
15
posted on
03/15/2013 8:23:24 PM PDT
by
uncommonsense
(Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
To: Nachum
Limbaugh said of the permanent political class. "I really believe the pursuit to make everybody like you is the greatest prison you could put yourself in."...starting with that guy at the top - Rinse Prepuce or whatever his name is - he looks like he expects somebody to smack him everytime he's on TV - hardly the figure to inspire confidence and determination in any organization.....
To: Nachum
Did you hear what Trump said about Rove? He called Rove the most overrated man in politics.
17
posted on
03/15/2013 9:20:56 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Rush Limbaugh Mocks ‘Brainiac’ GOP Consultants over Pat Caddell’s CPAC Rant, MadMax, the Grinning Reaper wrote:
I agree with Caddell and Rush. Spot on critiques. Too many GOP consultants are more interested in money than in fighting a smart fight. Just look at Karl Rove and youll know what I mean.
It’s not what the guy looks like it’s what he didn’t and don’t believe in doing and here is a list
http://www.thusmat.com/
18
posted on
03/15/2013 10:09:22 PM PDT
by
mosesdapoet
("It's a sin to tell a lie", in telling others that , got me my nickname .Ex Chi" mechanic"ret)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Thanks Nachum.
Limbaugh said Caddell "launched both barrels at CPAC" and let the Republican consultant class "have it" while blowing "the lid off of CPAC" with what Limbaugh described was a message that "the Republican consultant class is taking the party down the tubes, that they're making filthy amounts of money -- $150 million a campaign -- whether the candidate wins or loses."
Pot-kettle, Rush old boy.
19
posted on
03/15/2013 10:10:00 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
- ...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said. [Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften [immigration, gay marriage] stance]
- One day after announcing on his radio show that he is "truly considering" running in 2014 for the U.S. Senate seat now held by New Jersey's Frank Lautenberg, Rivera amped up his message today in a television interview and a column on the Fox News Latino website... a moderate Republican who is fiscally conservative but also supports gay marriage and Roe v. Wade... [Geraldo Rivera declares himself a 'moderate Republican' as he eyes U.S. Senate run]
20
posted on
03/15/2013 10:11:03 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson