Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Billionaire has unique role in official Washington: climate change radical
Washington Post ^ | 17 February 2013 | Juliet Eilperin

Posted on 02/23/2013 8:16:49 AM PST by Lorianne

When Thomas Steyer — a San Francisco billionaire and major Democratic donor — discusses climate change, he feels as if one of two things is true: What he’s saying is blindingly obvious, or insane.

It’s a somewhat shocking statement for someone who’s in the running to succeed the cerebral Steven Chu as energy secretary. Granted, he’s a long shot — the leading contender is MIT professor Ernest Moniz, who served as the department’s undersecretary during the Clinton administration — but his backers say his strength lies in combining business savvy with an activist’s passion.

But it’s not as if Steyer, 55, needs an official government perch to make an impact. Armed with his wealth and his political connections, Steyer has played a critical behind-the-scenes role in helping shape the country’s national energy policy. He has helped bankroll two successful ballot initiative campaigns in California since 2010, including one last fall that closes a corporate tax loophole and steers $500 million toward energy-efficiency projects for each of the next five years. He has funded initiatives at the Brookings Institution and the Center for American Progress, along with major research centers at Yale and Stanford. And he has spoken with President Obama about how to pursue climate and energy policy in a second term.

But Steyer is taking on a more prominent public role..“I’m not the first person you’d expect to be here today. I’m not a college professor and I don’t run an environmental organization,” he said. “For the last 30 years I’ve been a professional investor and I’ve been looking at billion-dollar investments for decades and I’m here to tell you one thing: The Keystone pipeline is not a good investment.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: billionaires; billiondollarmarxist; climatechange; donors; doomsdaycult; envirowhackos; globalistwarming; globalswarming; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; redistribution; steyer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Lorianne

“I’m not a college professor and I don’t run an environmental organization...”

And he sure as hell didn’t sleep at a Holiday Inn last night.


21 posted on 02/23/2013 9:29:13 AM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

How do you knows the Keystone is ponzi? The others are money laundering not poinzi.


22 posted on 02/23/2013 10:34:47 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Environmentalists Okay with Al Gore Selling Current TV for Oil Money

Gas Tax Could Become Green Energy Catalyst

Climate contradiction: Less snow, more blizzards

Carbon Tax Hallucinations

Dems hold fire on climate votes

Green groups rally on climate, urge Obama to reject Keystone pipeline

Obama’s energy plans—triumph or tragedy

Preparing For A World Of Climate Change-Induced Weather Disasters

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

Latest from CO2 Science

23 posted on 02/23/2013 12:02:16 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Environmentalists Okay with Al Gore Selling Current TV for Oil Money

Gas Tax Could Become Green Energy Catalyst

Climate contradiction: Less snow, more blizzards

Carbon Tax Hallucinations

Dems hold fire on climate votes

Green groups rally on climate, urge Obama to reject Keystone pipeline

Obama’s energy plans—triumph or tragedy

Preparing For A World Of Climate Change-Induced Weather Disasters

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

Latest from CO2 Science

24 posted on 02/23/2013 12:03:17 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

It is always amazing that someone so anti human can get so rich. The demagoguery of the left is without parallel and the amount of money they control is corrupting science along with everything else.


25 posted on 02/23/2013 1:06:34 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

Increasingly we are spending a higher percentage of the energy we get in the extraction of that energy. That’s not sustainable in the long run and it’s certainly not a good economic strategy.

The only way the ‘tar sands’ extraction can make money right now is by suckering in investors who think there is going to be a big payday down the road. But most of the money being made is in luring in investors.


26 posted on 02/23/2013 7:32:58 PM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

What would you suggest? I am not being funny.


27 posted on 02/23/2013 10:20:07 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Increasingly we are spending a higher percentage of the energy we get in the extraction of that energy

You are talking about windmills? High EROEI for wind is BS. Forget EROEI and look at price per kWh with and without subsidies and gas, oil and coal all win hands down.

28 posted on 02/25/2013 3:52:19 AM PST by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: palmer

I agree gas coal and oil win (with and without subsidies, which by the way there should be no subsidies).

However, the EROEI is constantly getting smaller and particularly with tar sands, it’s ridiculously small, even with lots of subsidies.

Thus Keystone is not economically viable because what it will be carrying is not economically viable


29 posted on 02/25/2013 6:25:25 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson