Skip to comments.Really? The Chicken as Endangered Species
Posted on 02/10/2013 8:29:43 AM PST by Kaslin
No one wants to send a species to extinction, but when a chicken that can be hunted and cooked for dinner is proposed as an endangered species, one has to question the entire program. When that proposed endangered species listing brings together representatives from oil, gas, and wind energy companies—as well as ranchers and farmers—you can be sure changes are needed in the way the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is applied.
The specific critter in question this time is the lesser prairie chicken (LPC) and the proposed ESA listing would have the federal government killing jobs, thwarting economic development, and giving Washington politicos power to control private lands in five states: New Mexico, Texas, Kansas, Colorado, and Oklahoma.
In a recent editorial, New Mexico’s Congressman Steve Pearce said: “The Endangered Species Act is one of the most heavy-handed unbending laws we have. …it gives bureaucrats the power to destroy entire economies with hardly a second thought.”
In 2011, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) entered into a massive settlement with environmental groups, in which the agency promised to address more than 250 candidate species it had previously found warranted protection but were precluded from listing due to a backlog. As a part of the closed-door agreement, the FWS also pledged to review hundreds more species proposed for listing. It is the “sue-and-settle agreements,” as Senator David Vitter (R-LA), the top Republican of the Environment and Public Works Committee, calls them, that have required the government to act. Vitter says: “This future regulation could prohibit many beneficial uses of tens of millions of acres of private property. All this was set in motion while no affected landowner or other stakeholder was given any opportunity for input.”
Addressing the proposed LPC listing, House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings(R-WA) said: “This proposed listing is a prime example of how the ESA is being driven by litigation instead of science. The Lesser Prairie Chicken was one of hundreds of species included in a settlement agreement between the Department of the Interior and litigious environmental organizations.”?
Now American taxpayers are left to fight the detrimental impacts of the settlement. Knowing the actual costs of designating lands as critical habitat—that would limit activity on large swaths of private property and state lands—state governments and stakeholder groups are spending millions of dollars to voluntarily limit threats to the species proposed for listing. These efforts are often called Candidate Conservation Agreements (CCAs). A recent letter to Dan Ashe, Director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, signed by 23 Senators, addressed proposed revisions to the economic impact analyses required by the ESA. In the letter, they state: “Such an approach is in direct contrast to the intent of Congress when the requirement for an economic analysis was inserted into the ESA in 1978."
Citizens of Texas and New Mexico who turned out in droves for the 2011 and 2012 hearings about the sand dune lizard and successfully prevented its listing are irritated that they must, once again, turn out for the dog-and-pony-show in an attempt to save their jobs and lands from government encroachment. LPC hearings will be held this week in Lubbock, TX, and Roswell, NM—and, yes, a turnout of hundreds is required and expected.
Last week hearings were held in Kansas and Oklahoma.
At the hearing in Oklahoma, Susan Jacobsen, southwest regional chief of the US Fish and Wildlife Services' Division of Threatened and Endangered Species, introduced the topic by saying: “it is likely that the lesser prairie chicken will become endangered within the foreseeable future (emphasis added).” At the hearing, a variety of local officials pleaded for time to allow the CCAs to work. State Senator Mike Shultz (R) referenced a recent aerial survey of the LPC habitat which show more than 37,000 birds counted across the range—despite record droughts: “I believe it's critical for the US Fish and Wildlife Service to allow this plan to be fully implemented and see the results we expect before any risk determination is made.” Tyler Powell, office director for the Oklahoma Office of the Secretary of Environment, said that “efforts to preserve the prairie chicken should preclude federal intervention and listing on the endangered species list.”
At the same hearing in Oklahoma, local rancher Alan Jett asked to keep the conservation “efforts on a more local, state level.” He pointed out that the majority of the “birds reside on privately owned land.”
Congressman Tim Huelskamp (R-KS) Sums up the concerns of his constituents: “Amid historic drought in the Great Plans, the last thing we need is another federal agency intruding into the lives and private property rights of Americans. In this case, we are talking about a bird that is populous enough that we can still hunt them in Kansas. This is not about preservation of a species; it’s about federal control of private landowners and limiting the ability to develop and grow rural America. Bureaucrats are becoming an invasive species in America’s heartland.”
Pearce recalls the economic impact the hastily-made decision to list the Mexican spotted owl had on New Mexico: “Our state lost hundreds of good paying, middle class jobs, all because of one reckless decision.” Regarding the spotted owl listing, he reports: “Earlier this year, Fish and Wildlife reevaluated its decision. They casually mentioned that logging wasn’t the problem after all. In fact, they said we need to bring logging back, because forests have grown so overcrowded that the owl is now at risk because of fires!”
While President Obama is giving his State of the Union Address, in which he will likely outline his key priorities for the fiscal year and the need for job creation—hundreds of people (including Congressman Pearce and myself) will gather in an airplane hangar in Roswell, NM, to rally against the Administration’s efforts to endanger their jobs. Following the rally, the concerned citizens will attend the FWS hearing (6:30-8:30) to voice their concerns.
Everyone is needed to attend the upcoming hearings in Lubbockand Roswelland/or comment on the FWS website. As is evidenced by the 2011 settlement, the LPC has plenty of environmentalists speaking on its behalf. Your comments are needed on behalf of the small businesses, family farmers, ranchers, and energy job creators who rely on the surrounding land for their livelihoods, job creation, and economic growth.
The FWS is under the management of the Department of the Interior—formerly headed by Secretary Ken Salazar. Last week Obama nominated Sally Jewell to lead the Interior Department. The New York Timesreports that she has vowed to “balance the agency’s sometimes conflicting mandates to promote resource development and preserve the nation’s natural heritage.” Since the LPC has nothing to do with preserving the nation’s natural heritage, maybe she’ll guide the decision toward promoting resource development—after all the ultimate decision, should she be confirmed, will be made on her watch. The decision, scheduled to be made by September 30, will tell us whether Obama’s second term will focus on what is best for the country, or if it will be filled with ideologues that lean extreme green.
When human society puts into positions of immense power individuals that envision elimination of tens of millions of other humans to save the earth, then humans are the ones that are the endangered species.
First, the Lesser Prairie Chicken is not your Colonel Sanders variety of chicken.
Second, this situation just drips with irony that is completely missing from this article. The LPC nests in the open in the prairie grasses which are actually on the increase as family farms disappear across the heartland. But, the LPC is a squirrely little bird and the oddest of things can disrupt their nesting patterns. It turns out that the greatest threat to the LPC is the wind turbine. They just don’t like the things and won’t nest anywhere near them. Bye bye prairie chicken as well as large numbers of raptors who are knocked senseless running into spinning turbine blades.
The enviro wackos are killing all these wild critters. Members of Congress are on the side of the enviro wackos on this one. Their constituents are making big bucks leasing prairie lands to wind turbine farms, so the fact that both the ranchers and the politicians are Republicans gets conveniently forgotten since money is involved.
Repeal the ESA!!!
The “Lesser” Prairie Chicken? Don’t you listen to the haters! You’re not lesser! You are special! We love you just the way you are!
I read last week that the anti-nuke people and the tree huggers are trying to stop construction of a third nuclear plant at the Enrico Fermi nuclear facility on the shore of Lake Erie in Newport, MI (south of Detroit).
They claim it will destroy the habitat of the locally threatened fox snake.
I think the proper terminology is "height challenged prairie chicken" or "luncheon size prairie chicken".
At the risk of being mean, am I the only one who finds humor in hearings being held in a hanger in Roswell, New Mexico? Concerning a species of poultry that is paranoid about where it nests and barely competes with a cornish game hen as a decent meal...
Thanks for the insight. We can be assured that the NYT will never divulge this little tidbit.
Just as a theory, the thumping of the rotors might imitate the drumming of the males, which would interfere with their mating rituals.
“Bureaucrats are becoming an invasive species in Americas heartland.” Thank you, Congressman Huelskamp!
One factor not covered in this story: much of the proposed restricted range in Kansas & Oklahoma covers (and it’s no coincidence) the Mississippi oil formation that we finally have the technology to drill. We can’t have any wealth originating in these red states, now can we?
All of this poses a big dilemma for the Left who have honed the ESA into a very sharp blade to slice their enemies to pieces and stop any development that they don’t like. They haven’t really made up their minds on wind turbines. The green energy argument runs up against the affront to their eyes when they venture out from their loft apartments to commune with nature. Now it turns out that birds and wind turbines don’t get along very well. What to do, what to do?
I personally don’t like wind turbines and find them much more offensive than an oil well or a fracking site. But let a migratory bird come to grief in your oil containment pond and you will suffer financial ruin and perhaps jail. Meanwhile wind turbines are immune from such harrassment and continue to suck up taxpayer dollars to subsidize a very inefficient energy production scheme.
Ditto! If species are too stupid to learn how to adapt to changing conditions, they deserve to go extinct.
It’s terrible that there are lesser Chickens.
We must immediately implement forced integration, mandatory busing, and a $10000 per chick head start pogrom to catch them up.
“More Federal Mommy”
There's a balance in here somewhere. Jobs and economic development are certainly important. But if we don't conserve the species we have, our children and grandchildren will only be able to see pictures of them in the history books.
Like the dodo. And like the passenger pigeon, which once thundered across American skies in great flocks but which perished forever when Martha died in 1914.
They are actually quite tasty, but the process is incredibly difficult and requires a highly-unlikely confluence of luck and skill.
This is an effort to control land use, period. That bird doesn't need any protection from humans.
It might need protection from coyotes, wolves, eagles, hawks and somesuch animals (themselves "protected"), but we humans couldn't inflict any damage on that thing's survival prospects, even if we wanted to.
For every human that walks this earth, there are 2.71 chickens. Does that mean humans are endangered too?
“According to the UN Environment Programme, the Earth is in the midst of a mass extinction of life. Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours.”
And it seems that during expeditions to find new species, they are quite successful.
It’s a continuing process, that usually goes on sight unseen,until someone wants to make a political stand.
Oh your post made me laugh!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.