Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance
Press TV ^ | 27 Jan 13

Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

1 posted on 01/31/2013 5:09:02 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

War and gay marriage....libertarian issues.

I guess it’s in his DNA.


2 posted on 01/31/2013 5:10:22 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
He should have left out the notion of attracting more people to the Republican Party and just focused on the fact that it's the right thing to do.

Without turning the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Eastern Europe into seas of glass, there is no way to win the "War on Terror".

3 posted on 01/31/2013 5:17:52 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Transcript please, sounds slightly like creative editing to marginalize the Senator


4 posted on 01/31/2013 5:18:53 PM PST by WilliamRobert (God Bless Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Transcript please, sounds slightly like creative editing to marginalize the Senator


5 posted on 01/31/2013 5:19:22 PM PST by WilliamRobert (God Bless Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

The “War On Terror” isn’t much different than the “War On Poverty”....ect....ect.


6 posted on 01/31/2013 5:22:11 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Anyone know what Rand Paul thinks about Amnesty?

Libertarians are usually all in on “Open Borders.”


7 posted on 01/31/2013 5:23:20 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert
Transcript please, sounds slightly like creative editing to marginalize the Senator

Well, I certainly don't trust Press TV (aka Iranian state media), but this sounds like stuff Rand would say. He's something of a libertarian, and I will bet much more like his Dad than he lets on. He has an isolationist (anti-war) foreign policy and isn't very interested in fighting over the social issues. Very much like his father.

8 posted on 01/31/2013 5:23:54 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Follow in the ideological footsteps of your nutcase dad and find that you hae support from nobody but Dad's fringe cult.
9 posted on 01/31/2013 5:26:29 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

McCain was never going to be able to or allowed to defeat Obama. I agree that the Republican party is going to have to change but I just don’t think Republicans have the spines to stand up and be true Constitutional adhering Conservatives. Nor do I think they will ever agree on why we lost in 2012, what we should do about it in the future or even have enough imagination to come up with a list of other things that could possibly go wrong.


10 posted on 01/31/2013 5:28:36 PM PST by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grams A
The Republican Party, of which I am no longer a member, is going to have to change indeed! They're going to have to stop trying to appease and pander to special interest groups and go back to advocating and practicing the basic truths they stood for in former years.



Keep Faith with the Fallen of Benghazi! Let the Obama Regime, for once, tell the Truth!

Fiat Justitia, Ruat Coelum!

Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

11 posted on 01/31/2013 5:34:21 PM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I do believe it’s high time for a lower profile foreign policy. It’s not our job to democratize the world. We do have some interests abroad, but helping jihadis overthrow stable Middle Eastern countries is not one of them. Plus, it’s related to our immigration policy. Since we import 100,000 Muslims annually, we are importing a growing terrorist threat within our own borders.


12 posted on 01/31/2013 5:35:38 PM PST by River Hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Can you explain our need to get involved in Libya? (and now apparently dozens of other African nations)


13 posted on 01/31/2013 5:37:58 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The Republican Party needs to broaden its appeal by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war," U.S. Sen. Rand Paul told hundreds of Greater Cincinnati Republicans Saturday.

Wrong, Rand. In fact, instead of being lazy and speaking in generalities, invite voters who actually care to examine the record. More liberal DEMOCRAT leftists are responsible for sending more American men and women to war than are the 'Pubbies.

And, thse same DEMOCRATS are responsible for those troops remaining at war than are Republicans. While the 'Pubbies usually take a harder stance toward defending America and talking a good story, it is the left that actually sends more American military to war because they think it makes them "look presidential" and they get a footnote in history of being a "wartime president".

IOW, it's all about who is full of more crapola! Tell people THAT story, Rand!!

14 posted on 01/31/2013 6:54:08 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for anti-American criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The Republican Party needs to broaden its appeal by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war," U.S. Sen. Rand Paul told hundreds of Greater Cincinnati Republicans Saturday.

Avoiding conflict, ditching principles, setting aside morality, taking a puff on the bong, and engaging in some inconsequential gender neutral free love -BUT limiting government and being fiscally conservative?

Who does this morally devoid anarchist idiot think he is fooling?

15 posted on 01/31/2013 6:54:36 PM PST by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Faggots in the military. Women in combat. Geez, I have a problem with women voting. Abortion. Welfare. $16+ trillion in debt. Gun grabbing. Obama phones. Wet backs. Government schools. Over regulation. Over taxation. Crime ridden cities. Hatred of American Exceptionalism. And we have a Muslim Marxist for a president.

Just exactly how many of my principles, values, religious beliefs and God given rights to I have give up for a bunch of pussy Republicans? We have a cry baby for a Speaker and a vast majority of Republican house members votes for him. There are only three Republican Senators that voted against John F'n Kerry, a communist traitor.

Rand Paul can shove it up his ...

sorry for the rant.

16 posted on 01/31/2013 7:10:49 PM PST by ConservativeInPA (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

If we are going to send our children to fight a war, we need to at least give them the tools to win it.

We were right to go into Afghanistan and kick the Taliban out. We should have been a bit more brutal in our initial entrance and we should have left 10 years ago. We might have had to go back once or twice but clearly we shouldn’t be “nation building” in an Islamic cesspool like Afghanistan.

As I have stated numerous times, we lost the war in Afghanistan when we ordered the Army to burn Bibles. We lost our moral authority when that happened. IMHO we can’t get out of there soon enough.


17 posted on 01/31/2013 7:17:16 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: River Hawk
It’s not our job to democratize the world

It is our job to destroy our enemies. Rebuilding their countries and giving them a government that they didn't earn by spilling their own blood is not our job. That was a Bush idea. Obama just wants to make love to them ...f'n faggot.

18 posted on 01/31/2013 7:17:16 PM PST by ConservativeInPA (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

No need to apologize....thats the way many of us feel....and you said it quite well. Thank You


19 posted on 01/31/2013 7:30:21 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins
War and gay marriage....libertarian issues.

First things to cross my mind, too.



20 posted on 01/31/2013 7:35:55 PM PST by rdb3 (We're all going to get what only some of us deserve...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I agree with Paul that we shouldn’t try to democratize any more Islamic countries, and should avoid getting involved in wars in Africa.

But I don’t get the comments on gay marriage. The GOP already has plenty in its ranks who support gay marriage or civil unions. The question which Paul fails to address is how the question ultimately gets decided.

Will it be left to the states to decide for themselves as it should? Will Congress retain the power to decide for federal purposes, as it should? Or will the Courts usurp power and impose recognition of gay unions on the entire nation?

That’s what worries me when Republicans talk like this. It makes me think they are okay with the Courts hijacking the issue and imposing the Left’s will. The people of Kentucky overwhelmingly voted to ban gay marriage, and that decision should stand forever unless the people of Kentucky decide to reverse course. I hope Paul at least agrees with that.


21 posted on 01/31/2013 7:47:05 PM PST by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yeah, Democrats never start wars.


22 posted on 01/31/2013 7:50:23 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (So?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Will he protect religious orgs/churches and children from gay rights groups then? Doubt it.


23 posted on 01/31/2013 7:57:54 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

Rand Paul is a lot more socially conservative than he lets on ... he is a christian social conservative and is raising his kids that way but he doesn’t think the Federal gov’t should be involved in many of these issues. He would be different as governor of Kentucky than president for example because if he were the governor he can dictate what goes on in the state like banning gay marriage but if he were president he would not do that.


24 posted on 01/31/2013 8:27:09 PM PST by JohnPDuncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RginTN

Yes he would. One of the problems with those calling for federal bans of marriage, do you really want the Democrats in the Senate defining marriage and getting involved ? NO. Rand points out that this is bad for Christians and that they should work at state level and not call for more Federal involvement.


25 posted on 01/31/2013 8:30:17 PM PST by JohnPDuncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins; All

” - - - To help the party rebound from two successive losses in presidential races, Republicans must - - - “

_________________ STOP BEING REPUBLICANS IN NAME ONLY !

DUH!


26 posted on 01/31/2013 8:37:08 PM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Commune Obama"care" violates Anti-Trust Laws, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

And Rand Paul continues his decline into RINOism.

Why don’t you RINO’s just wave a white flag and switch to the Dem party since you want to “soften” everything and “appeal” to (fill in the blank).

What next? More welfare? Triple Obamacare spending?

Any Repubican tyring to out pander a Dem will always lose.

Might as well change their name to “The Whigs”


27 posted on 01/31/2013 8:39:44 PM PST by Fledermaus (I'm done with the GOP. Let them wither and die. Let's start over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

There is only one political party in the US, the Fabian Communist Gobalist Party of which the democrats represent the left wing and the republicans, the right wing.


28 posted on 01/31/2013 8:44:12 PM PST by Enough is ENOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aetius

I don’t think it matters what Republicans say about any issue. It will just be distorted by the media in order to shape public perceptions that will favor their leftist agenda.


29 posted on 01/31/2013 8:46:29 PM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks xzins.
...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... “We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party,” Paul said.
And less bellicose, y'know, like, stop supporting our allies and let his foreign employers overrun the world.


30 posted on 01/31/2013 8:55:41 PM PST by SunkenCiv (He's Obama Lite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aetius

“But I don’t get the comments on gay marriage. The GOP already has plenty in its ranks who support gay marriage or civil unions. The question which Paul fails to address is how the question ultimately gets decided.”

A few years ago, Texas approved a constitutional amendment that marriage is between a man and a woman. So, it’s decided in this state.


31 posted on 01/31/2013 8:57:15 PM PST by Marcella (Prepping can save your life today. Going Galt is freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JohnPDuncan
Yes he would. One of the problems with those calling for federal bans of marriage, do you really want the Democrats in the Senate defining marriage and getting involved ? NO. Rand points out that this is bad for Christians and that they should work at state level and not call for more Federal involvement.

Thus far no one advocating giving up on social issues have offered any protections for religious orgs/children. Gay rights orgs will sue churches, go after children in schools and they will be fighting back on their own because Republicans have been told to surrender. That's what will happen,

Gays rights groups work on all levels of govt. They push first and we shouldn't surrender.

32 posted on 01/31/2013 9:00:56 PM PST by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

no it’s great. I really enjoyed it.


33 posted on 01/31/2013 9:15:51 PM PST by dervish (either the vote was corrupt or the electorate is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Morgana

I think we need to bring the troops home, no more nation building. Kill the bads and come home. But soften the stance on social issues??

Well, he will never get my vote.


34 posted on 01/31/2013 10:46:33 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I don’t approve of using our military for nation building/social engineering other nations. We can’t afford it and it does not work.

We need to ditch the Powell idea of ‘You break it, you fix it.” When we are attacked by someone’s terrorists and need to take them out, that is all we should do and leave.

I appreciated Reagan’s approach with Quadafi when he flapping his anti-american lips and doing terrorist hits against us. He bombed his house, killed some of his family members, and then we had no further problems with the creep.

Obama’s drone take out is the way to target problems and not do all out war. But I despise our troops being used as nation builders/peace corps volunteers. I could give a crap about building up Muslim nations. Our nation needs building up. You wack the problem and get out.


35 posted on 02/01/2013 12:24:06 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
"You can’t have open borders and a welfare state…” Rand Paul
36 posted on 02/01/2013 12:31:35 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
Thanks for the immigration quote.

That’s a pleasant surprise.

I like a lot of things about Rand Paul.

But I do worry about his semi-isolationist views on foreign policy, the military, and Israel.

37 posted on 02/01/2013 12:45:11 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: xzins
"Daddy, daddy, did I do good? I really gave old Dubya what-fer!" Imagine 'Pubbie impertinence, 'eager to go to war' just because a bunch of terrorists killed 3000 innocent Americans at their desks and in their airliners on a pellucid Tuesday morning when the country was at peace.

Warmongers! Boo, hiss!!

What, did Dalton Trumbo write the script for this speech?

38 posted on 02/01/2013 1:56:00 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen
But I do worry about his semi-isolationist views on foreign policy, the military, and Israel.

It isn't even isolationism any more, if he drags out the President of the United States for cracking open a giant can of whoopass on people who committed mass terror-murder on our soil unsanctioned by any belligerent nation or lawful declaration of hostilities.

39 posted on 02/01/2013 1:59:47 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Jim Robinson
Thought this might interest you Jim.

Seems the real Rand Paul is beginning to show itself.

40 posted on 02/01/2013 2:27:35 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins; SoConPubbie
"The Republican Party needs to broaden its appeal by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war," U.S. Sen. Rand Paul told hundreds of Greater Cincinnati Republicans Saturday."

Goodbye, Rand. We hardly knew ye.

41 posted on 02/01/2013 2:46:11 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
"turning the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Eastern Europe into seas of glass"

I'm ALL for that policy! Either nuke 'em and nix the rebuilding or stay out completely. But since their intentions are jihad, we must get out and then nuke!

42 posted on 02/01/2013 2:54:37 AM PST by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; SoConPubbie

I get so sick of having a party that is enough correct to attract you, but then there are some blatant red flag concerns. It seems they are using a hegelian dialectic to push us to immorality and loss of freedom. Give us choices between good + mixture of bad versus bad + mixture of real bad. The direction is gradually toward the bad.

1. Social Issues
2. Fiscal Issues
3. National Security Issues
4. (Issues of Independence?)

I’m not sure if the 4th isn’t assumed in each of the others, but wouldn’t it be great is we had a party that

1. Social: Promoted life and wholesomeness
2. Fiscal: Promoted Living within our means in rational policies of taxation and budgeting.
3. Nat’l Secuity: Promoted a firm but fair “Don’t Tread on Me”
4. Independence: Get out of our lives and let us pursue happiness as God gives us the ability to do so with alertness to not doing harm to others .

Where is THAT political party?


43 posted on 02/01/2013 3:23:42 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert; Longbow1969

This is virtually identical to what was in the Cincinnati Enquirer (the largest city near me), but whatever news corp they are associated with doesn’t permit any posting of any of their material on Free Republic. So, I found another report of the same event.

Aside from that, the only way I can think of for you to get a transcript would be for you to write to the Hamilton County, Ohio, Republican Party, the sponsors of this event.


44 posted on 02/01/2013 3:27:38 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xzins

And we’d have all that if they’d simply abide by the Declaration and Constitution. The founders knew what they were doing. And they we’re infinitely better statesmen and stewards of state than our modern cabal of corrupt power-grabbing politicians.


45 posted on 02/01/2013 3:32:58 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I believe those two documents are priceless treasures borne of centuries of longing for true freedom. I do think that God smiled on their production.

The intelligentsia want to get rid of the Constitution now and are even bold enough to begin a campaign against it. I’m sure they believe they have the power to control a constitutional convention and rewrite this God-ordained constitution. (Refer to the 2nd amendment at this point.)

What they can’t do is change the Declaration. It details the reasons why the 2nd amendment is legitimately used against the tyrants. They can only hope to burn it. Along with Bibles.

These truly are times that try men’s souls.

We are confronted with the choice of taking control of the Republican Party or founding a real, new party. The ONLY way either will happen is if there’s a revival of faith in Almighty God, the advocate of the words: “We are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights.”

Leave God Lose Freedom

Follow God Find Freedom


46 posted on 02/01/2013 3:50:20 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: xzins

But the GOP is the marketing department for the military-industrial complex, and John McCain is the Senior VP of Sales. If McCain stopped constantly pushing for war in every part of the world that he claims have “terrorists”, he wouldn’t make quota.

BTW, the “terrorist” meme may be the best marketing ploy ever invented.


47 posted on 02/01/2013 4:29:29 AM PST by Rum Tum Tugger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I interpret the Constitution to allow War, operations short of war, and clandestine operations, all with the approval of Congress.

Declaration of War
Letter of Reprisal
Letter of Marque

Like with Reagan’s treatment of Libya, Afghanistan & Iraq should have been a Reprisal, carried out with ruthlessness and then redeployment, if the Congress didn’t have guts to declare war.

And even with a declaration of war I would have done just as you said, gone in, smashed the hell out of things, governments, and leaders, and then left with a promise to do it again if they bothered me again.


48 posted on 02/01/2013 4:32:52 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: River Hawk

Spot on.

Attempting to civilize Afghanistan was a fool’s errand from the beginning. We should have left after the punitive expedition phase, and never started the meals on wheels phase.

We’d have been there maybe a year.


49 posted on 02/01/2013 4:33:53 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rum Tum Tugger

http://www.mapsofwar.com/ind/american-wars.html

An interesting website to watch regarding democrat and republican wars. Click play after it loads.


50 posted on 02/01/2013 4:43:07 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson