Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC/WSJ poll: For first time, majority thinks abortion should be legal in all or most cases
Hotair ^ | 01/22/2013 | AllahPundit

Posted on 01/22/2013 8:23:39 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: varmintman
This article is obvious propaganda and poll manipulation.

Ask yourself, if this is true why are the old hags at NARAL freaking out?

NARAL Prez to Resign: Says Pro-Choice Side Getting Too Old
(October 2012) NARAL’s pro-abortion president, Nancy Keenan, announced today she will resign her position at the end of the year to help the pro-abortion group overcome one of the problems plaguing the pro-abortion movement — a lack of young leaders....

...Anecdotally, Keenan related the story of getting off her train in Washington during the weekend of the March for Life, which saw 400,000 pro-life advocates fill the nation’s capital to rally against abortion.

She saw huge numbers of teenagers and young adults that she doesn’t typically see at pro-abortion rallies.

“I just thought, my gosh, they are so young,” Keenan recalled. “There are so many of them, and they are so young.”
Don't forget, these people kill babies for money. Lying is nothing to them.
81 posted on 01/22/2013 10:52:12 AM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: varmintman

Or, to put it another way....

The average female voter in this country would rather elect Hitler, Stalin, or Pol Pot than to run the risk that maybe, possibly, somehow, someday, somebody might pose an impediment to their ability to get an abortion. Provided they ever needed one.

That is really MESSED UP!


82 posted on 01/22/2013 10:55:10 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I find this hard to believe. Polls in recent years have shown young people moving away from supporting abortion.


83 posted on 01/22/2013 10:58:18 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
doesn’t know which issue Roe v. Wade actually dealt with.

29% answered "a throw-down between two celebrity chefs on Food Network".


84 posted on 01/22/2013 10:59:31 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
As bad as Romney was, Allen, Mourdock and Atkins were worse. Not because they were liberals, just the opposite. They were professed conservatives who expressed views on abortion which were so bizarre that they set the pro-life movement back substantially.

Nope, you missed it completely.

Mourdock and Adkins statements were pounced on by the media, twisted, perverted and made a ridiculous cause celebre. The difference was that in decades past, the Republican party nominee at the top of the ticket at least pretended to be a pro-lifer with stones and was happy to fight with the media about the issue and articulate our side in a meaningful way.

Not so with Romney. He piled on Mourdock and Adkins and in doing so, we lost a major opportunity to educate the public on pro-life issues.

THAT is the difference. And THAT is why I will never vote for another Republican who is not a staunch, articulate pro-lifer. To hell with them otherwise.
85 posted on 01/22/2013 11:01:06 AM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
I see.

A Republican senate candidate makes a politically insensitive, wholly inane, demonstrably false claim regarding the physiology of a woman during rape and it's the media's fault for jumping on it?

86 posted on 01/22/2013 11:08:30 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I wouldn’t trust NBC if they told me the sky was blue. They have a long reputation of lying, bias, obfuscation, leftism, attacks on conservatives and Republicans, Reagan and Palin-bashing, slanting the news and omitting anything unfavorable to those they like.


87 posted on 01/22/2013 11:13:26 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The headlines are misleading. Dig down deep into the poll and it’s doesn’t back up the assertions.


88 posted on 01/22/2013 11:18:54 AM PST by Fledermaus (The Republic is Dead: Collapse the system. Fire all politicians and impeach the judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

There is no shortage of Republicans who really believe that government-funded abortions would be a dandy way to cut the welfare rolls. They’ve largely been hiding under a rock since Reagan, but they’ve always been out there.


89 posted on 01/22/2013 11:19:28 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
A Republican senate candidate makes a politically insensitive, wholly inane, demonstrably false claim regarding the physiology of a woman during rape and it's the media's fault for jumping on it?

No, it's the media's fault for turning one questionable comment into "GOP says women must accept rape" meme and the Romney-idiots fault for giving credence to that meme with their weak, meandering and defensive responses, most of which focused on bashing the GOP senate candidate in question.

The proper response would have been a thorough-going defense of the entire pro-life position writ-large for the whole country to see. Such a presentation, done by an articulate and affable candidate (Romney was neither), would have made the media back off immediately.

But the GOP didn't do that either because 1.) they are stupid or 2.) the leadership is not really pro-life anymore. They just pretend to be for votes.
90 posted on 01/22/2013 11:29:18 AM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
I just noticed another thread which essentially indicates the opposite of this thread concerning public support for abortion.
"Pro-Choice" Americans at Record-Low 41% [May 2012]

What am I overlooking?

91 posted on 01/22/2013 11:38:08 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
The average female voter in this country would rather elect Hitler, Stalin, or Pol Pot than to run the risk that maybe, possibly, somehow, someday, somebody might pose an impediment to their ability to get an abortion. Provided they ever needed one.

That is really MESSED UP!

GRANTED that is messed up, the question is, is it AS messed up as allowing demoKKKrats to win national elections? It isn't clear to me that it is. This is the closest thing the dems have to a winning issue and their advertising last summer and Fall, at least in the swing states, featured little else.

My brother's next door neighbor told him she'd like to vote for RR based on economic and business positions but that "I have a teenage daughter, I can't chance it". That's what we're dealing with. It's probably the case that conservatives needs to redouble their efforts at changing people's hearts, and drop any efforts or thoughts about changing laws. Dems view this one the way we view the 2'nd amendment i.e. they're willing to go to war over it.

92 posted on 01/22/2013 12:08:48 PM PST by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
Exactly. The longer we live in the bubble the worse it will be .... and it is BAD.

So are you going to change your screen name to "Leftward Ho"?

93 posted on 01/22/2013 12:26:13 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

You’re overlooking the completely different questions in the two polls; Gallup was asking if people identify THEMSELVES as “Pro-Choice” and “Pro-Life” - the polls in this thread are asking people for their opinions on specific laws and policies.

Many people who don’t feel comfortable with identifying themselves as “Pro-Choice” support Pro-Choice policies.

A related or separate issue is how you ask the same question; if you asked “Should women be allowed to murder their unborn babies?” you’ll get mostly no answers; ask the EXACT SAME sample “Should women have the right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy?” you’ll get mostly yes answers.


94 posted on 01/22/2013 1:14:10 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Mourdock and Adkins statements were pounced on by the media, twisted, perverted and made a ridiculous cause celebre

They were pre-twisted, and didn't require the media to do the twisting. If Romney had supported Mourdock and Akin, he would have lost by 2-3% more than he did.

95 posted on 01/22/2013 1:19:09 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002
At best you could make it a state’s right case. At *best*. And a few might actually ban it. A national ban will never EVER happen. It’s going to start costing more and more elections. I don’t like abortion, but if you gotta make a fight out of it, I say move to a country that bans it or try to make it a state thing.

All I ever wanted was to see Roe v. Wade overturned. If a state wants abortion, let 'em have it. My problem was that some interventionist justices decided it was a Constitutional right when it wasn't, and prevented states from outlawing it if they so wished.

96 posted on 01/22/2013 1:39:50 PM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

Of course the poll is misleading. How can the majority of the country say they are pro-life, but also say they are OK with murdering the unborn. These are liberal polls. How many republicans will say it’s OK to murder the unborn? I rest my case. These liberal polls come out for one reason only, to be mentioned on the liberal news shows and repeated like they are gospel. Bill O’Reilly the faux Catholic will also mentioned it, probably tonight........and agree with it.


97 posted on 01/22/2013 3:10:33 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sans-Culotte

I’m sorry, rvw will never be overturned. I wish it could be, but that couldn’t happen with a full Bush appointed USSC much less a 6 or 5 con one. It’ll never, ever happen. And things are going more liberal, not less. That war is lost. We have to fight what we can and make up the losses much later in generations to come.


98 posted on 01/22/2013 3:24:52 PM PST by Monty22002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

time to change churches.


99 posted on 01/22/2013 9:09:31 PM PST by BrianE ("Dead at 25 buried at 65 the average American" - Benjamin Franklin 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Monty22002

i’m sorry but this country may not exist according to your time table.


100 posted on 01/22/2013 9:13:35 PM PST by BrianE ("Dead at 25 buried at 65 the average American" - Benjamin Franklin 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson