Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I love criticizing Obama when he's wrong, as I showed in this FR thread.

However, it turns out that I, and many others here, were wrong about Obama's daughters' school employing armed guard. We should be willing to humbly admit that we were wrong on this issue, and try not to make mistakes of this nature in the future.

1 posted on 01/20/2013 6:49:43 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: grundle

Jury is still out for me. I never consider the Washington Post a good source for accurate info.


2 posted on 01/20/2013 6:52:40 PM PST by Josa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
However, it turns out that I, and many others here, were wrong about Obama's daughters' school employing armed guard.

Given that the source is the long-discredited Washington Post, is their assertion on this mattter really the truth?

3 posted on 01/20/2013 6:52:40 PM PST by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
"“Sidwell Friends security officers do not carry guns.” "

...since Wednesday.

4 posted on 01/20/2013 6:52:51 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

I would go with this saying “trust but verified”, knowing this is from the Washington Post.


5 posted on 01/20/2013 6:53:19 PM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

I’m not a fan of the armed guards idea for all schools but the simple fact is that the secret service protects those girls and are very much armed even if the school isn’t.


6 posted on 01/20/2013 6:54:02 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

>>We should be willing to humbly admit that we were wrong on this issue, and try not to make mistakes of this nature in the future.

OMG...we are our own worst enemy. We find ourselves in a bar fight and we’re shouting “fight fair” as we get beat to death with bar stools and beer bottles. Read “Rules for Radicals” and realize that WE are the radicals now.


7 posted on 01/20/2013 6:55:50 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
"“Sidwell Friends security officers do not carry guns.” "

But they are readily available should the need arise.

8 posted on 01/20/2013 6:57:02 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Bathhouse Barry wants YOU to bend over for another four years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

I looked up jobs that were open at the time this came out - they do have licensed special police officers, and they have to be licensed to carry guns....


9 posted on 01/20/2013 6:57:26 PM PST by porter_knorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Why would the school need to hire armed guards when the secret service is armed and at the school.


11 posted on 01/20/2013 7:00:24 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Notice that they are careful not to say that there are no armed personnel, just that the school itself doesn’t emply any armed guards. All the armed guards are employed by the federal government.


12 posted on 01/20/2013 7:01:05 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The only thing that Hollywood gets right about guns is that criminals will always get them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
Now if we could get the Washington Post and other liberal rags to be this diligent in investigating Fast and Furious!

These “Journalists” are such A-holes!

14 posted on 01/20/2013 7:01:44 PM PST by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

I think I saw another version that said that SOME of the guards are ex-police, and may carry arms. I, too, wish that we could have a news source on this that we could trust.

I presume from the name of the school that it was originally founded by Quakers, and may still have some of that element in it. Quakers have a history of refusing all violence, including self defense.

It still appears to have Quaker connections, although I can’t vouch for their position today on such matters. They did apparently bend the basic Quaker rules sufficiently far to take Obama’s kids, knowing that if they did the school would be surrounded by armed Secret Service agents:

http://www.sidwell.edu/about_sfs/quaker-values/index.aspx


15 posted on 01/20/2013 7:02:22 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

May I suggest the possibility that, when the daughters of the President are attending a school, the security is actually managed and dictated by the Secret Service and all armed personnel are ONLY Secret Service. IMHO - When the Secret Service is guarding a principal and the only other person in the room or area is a local cop or security guard, that cop or guard is then considered, by default, the greatest threat.


16 posted on 01/20/2013 7:02:44 PM PST by LZ_Bayonet ( I AM THE TEA PARTY LEADER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
“Sidwell Friends security officers do not carry guns.”

So they keep them in their cars? I'd parse every word on this one.

Nevertheless, let's assume it's true. They've just advertised that they're a big fat target on any day that 0bama's offspring aren't there.

17 posted on 01/20/2013 7:02:46 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Oh sure!

Now Sidwell will be crawling with mass murderers.


18 posted on 01/20/2013 7:03:31 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Do the secret service assigned to protect the 2 children carry firearms?


19 posted on 01/20/2013 7:03:45 PM PST by Texas Songwriter (THAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

Washington Post, yeah right.


20 posted on 01/20/2013 7:03:54 PM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
However, it turns out that I, and many others here,

Speak for yourself.

22 posted on 01/20/2013 7:04:22 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle
The basic point of the NRA ad is still valid even if it's true that Sidwell Friends
has no armed security. 0bama's children do and he opposes that for us serfs.
23 posted on 01/20/2013 7:05:44 PM PST by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: grundle

“In fact, it has no armed guards.”

Now.


24 posted on 01/20/2013 7:06:32 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson