To: Nachum
didn’t he just destroy their whole argument with that statement?
3 posted on
01/17/2013 10:08:10 PM PST by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: GeronL
Yea, but it’s for the children.
To: GeronL
Well yes, but don’t worry, those 23 Executive Orders will fix EVERYTHING!!!/s;)
To: GeronL
didn’t he just destroy their whole argument with that statement?Nope. They just proved their position. They want to ban guns for everyone and don't care to bother with the finer points of enforcing the laws already on the books. If they did a better job enforcing laws, there would be less opportunities to blame guns for crimes.
10 posted on
01/17/2013 10:14:32 PM PST by
tpmintx
(Gun free zones are hunting preserves for unarmed people.)
To: GeronL
he did, but he’s too smart to realize it.
17 posted on
01/17/2013 10:40:02 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: GeronL
Yes, he did but it won’t matter because ‘Rats are logic challenged.
To: GeronL
"didn’t he just destroy their whole argument with that statement?" My thought too. Why even have the form?
27 posted on
01/18/2013 2:36:24 AM PST by
DeaconRed
(Japan said after WW2 they never considered invading US. Too many with Guns. 2nd amendant worked.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson