I don’t think it really matters to tell you the truth. There are people who could do as much damage with a revolver and a bunch of HKS speed loaders.
Your argument with the ‘liberal’ really isn’t about capacity, how quickly a gun shoots, or anything like that. Your liberal is only drawing you into a conditional argument about every citizen’s right to defend oneself with whatever is necessary.
As I recall, the bushmaster wasn’t the trunk of the car, which was reported by the police initially on scene. Then during a press briefing the coroner reported that the killer used an assault rifle.
Many conflicts here, not sure what to think anymore.
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrngdgUixYg
Yes, that’s the word here. In every shooting like this, the police waste absolutely no time in holding up the gun that was used to the media. Never happened here. Now, why do you think that is? They always try to demoniize the gun. Just my two cents.
Weren’t all the weapons legally owned by the mother? It wasn’t that they were illegal but rather the intent of the deranged shooter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry1UmwgOCGM&list=HL1358375115
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mlszDIRZb0&list=HL1358375115
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EEKqcRELz4&list=HL1358375115
What you really need are (1) a better, more informative headline and (2) the Chat forum. :)
And yes, GO CARDS!
“Where do I find the information that the Sandy Hook shooter actually did not use the assault rifle....”
.
There was never an assault rifle involved in the Sandy Hook shooting — the Bushmaster that was allegedly used is not a fully automatic weapon, hence is not an assault rifle.
Forget pretty much everything that was first reported. The most credible report was that of an official in a news conference that said all the victims were shot multiple times with the Bushmaster. The gun recovered from the car trunk was a pump shotgun.
“I thought I read the police found the rifle in his car.”
That was an early report that turned out to be inaccurate. The video is easy to find on youtube, go watch it yourself. If you know anything about guns, it’s pretty easy to tell that it is a shotgun and not any kind of rifle. They even zoom in at the 6 second mark so that you can clearly see that what they are ejecting from the weapon is a shotgun shell and not any type of rifle ammunition.
would those children be just as dead if he waited for recess and then drove a car over them again and again... it is the killer who is responsible and not the tool... though he is a tool...
the deadliest school killing was done with dynamite. an angry public servant that lost an election.
9-11 happened with box cutters and planes.
do not fall for some guns are bad. stick with the constitution and history.
governments kill more people. but not those who are armed... never people who are armed.
There are two theories about arguing with a liberal________________ Nether one works.
If you think you read it, you probably did - tell the jerk that’s the way it was, amd if he objects, tell him to look it up himself on the internet.....