Posted on 01/16/2013 7:15:51 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Seems all of this weeks discussion is silly - lots of discussion on what people will say or do. If not the President, it is Lance Armstrong and his show tomorrow.
I am all for waiting to see what is actually said then debate.
Some Liberal co-workers have argued with me this morning on this line:
The first amendment says “Congress shall make no law...” Thus, the second amendment restriction on infringement only applies to the Legislative branch. Therefore, executive orders requiring confiscation would be perfectly legal.
I mean... wow. I couldn’t even counter it. The stupidity was so great as to be blinding.
Actually, the Constitution says it DOESN'T.
Since we no longer worry about that flawed document, the constitution, and Obama is worshiped by the media, there is almost no limit to his powers.
(Not to mention the electorate is under educated, and chronically distracted).
You don't think Mr. Weepy (Boner) is going to do anything, do you?
Truth is the only way to stop these commies is to unelect Democrats.We have to start State by state starting with the low hand=ging fruit!!
RE: The first amendment says Congress shall make no law...
Since this guy wants to abolish all context, then to use his argument, Congress should make no law. PERIOD.
Which means Obamacare should not be law because Congress made it. :)
Liberal=insane
What’s the Constitution say about illegal Mexican “immigrants” and foreigners becoming President of the United States?
I’m not saying that Obama is an illegal alien or even born outside the country but he has failed to prove that he’s eligible to be POTUS. In fact, red flags popped up when he posted a FAKE birth certificate on the White House website.
We cannot pick and choose which parts of the US Constitution are important and which parts are not.
As far as I’m concerned the man is likely as American as you and me, but there was a reason he refused to acknowledge the questions about his eligibility and it was likely nothing to do about anything he’s hiding and ALL about snubbing the US Constitution. He was testing the waters as to how much the American people really care about the Constitution.
Unfortunately, only Alan Keyes and the Birthers passed this test. Only they have a right to be concerned about Obama’s trampling on gun rights and the rest of the US Constitution.
The real lesson: We cannot be picking and choosing which parts of the US Constitution are enforced and which parts are not. When we do that, we’re just as guilty as the Obamanists who are ripping it to shreds.
Say to them “So, in your oppinion there is no reason for congress to exist at all and you’d be happy if obama was king.” Then tell them you wouldn’t be happy so they should move to .........
Say to them “So, in your oppinion there is no reason for congress to exist at all and you’d be happy if obama was king.” Then tell them you wouldn’t be happy so they should move to .........
He will do anything he wants to do. Who will prevent him? The part of the American public with its head up its a$$ that voted for him? The wimpy Republicans?
Obama and his crew of Chicago mobsters can't find 10 million illegal aliens hiding in plain sight, yet they plan to round up 300+ million firearms.
How dumb is that?
==================================================
Publishing names/addresses of citizens with legal gun permits is only the beginning.
Americans demand to know the names/addresses of federal/state/and local politicans with gun permits.
And who on the govt payroll----- at every level of govt----- has a permit to own a gun.
==================================================
THE PLUSPERFECT REASON WHY THE CITIZENRY NEEDS TO BE ARMED
Weve got to have a civilian national security force (which answers to me) thats just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded as the military. - candidate Barack Obama on his plans for America.
Do individuals have a right to be protected from violence by others?
Do you know that in 2005 the Supreme Court ruled that police do not have a duty to protect citizens? There also have been other cases with the same result, which is as a US citizen you are on your own for protection.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/28scotus.html?_r=0
Given these two points, ask them how do you plan to protect yourself from someone who is big, faster, stronger and may be armed with any sort of weapon from a base ball bat to a knife to an axe to a gun?
Come And Get Me Coppers!
What a maroon! Laws don't ever stop behavior; they only create penalties for behavior...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.