Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control by Executive Order? Are there limits to what the president can accomplish this way?
National Review ^ | 01/16/2013 | Scott Coffina

Posted on 01/16/2013 7:15:51 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: SeekAndFind

I don’t know why we even engage in this debate. The 2A is a natural law, a God given right existing before the Constitution! These friggin socialist libtard pukes want to debate this they can take it up with God, in person, once the talk has ended, and they learn first hand the consequences of infringement upon this right from God fearing Patriots!


21 posted on 01/16/2013 8:44:58 AM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carthego delenda est

little barry bastard boy is squelching those dangerous clingers with their guns and Bibles don’tchaknow.


22 posted on 01/16/2013 8:52:05 AM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: YouGoTexasGirl

Amen!

LLS


23 posted on 01/16/2013 9:18:30 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

With the stroke of a pen...Poof...

Well, I guess he and his minions made this easy...


24 posted on 01/16/2013 9:34:17 AM PST by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox
"Given these two points, ask them how do you plan to protect yourself from someone who is big, faster, stronger and may be armed with any sort of weapon from a base ball bat to a knife to an axe to a gun?"

-This is why I think women lose the most.


25 posted on 01/16/2013 9:53:19 AM PST by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Liz

There may be an issue with the civilian national security force “HS” move for closer ties to local law enforcement. They get to know the local law and find leverage to coerce toeing the line; and, figure out whom won’t play ball and disarm/ disband those in a surprise action. Adding several hundred reserve deputies with plan of action could make this proposition somewhat more sticky.


26 posted on 01/16/2013 2:02:01 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
“Congress shall make no law...”

The low information cannot possible know that the Administration - Article 2 - is not authorized to create LAWS.
27 posted on 01/16/2013 4:29:03 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan
(Not to mention the electorate is under educated, and chronically distracted). AND is overly propagandized by a corrupt 4th Estate.
28 posted on 01/16/2013 4:32:33 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama certainly CANNOT confiscate legally owned guns in your home.

From District of Columbia v. Heller, in which DC tried to get the Federal District Court of Appeals judgement [for Heller] overturned:

... In sum, we hold that the District’s ban on handgun possession in the home violates the Second Amendment , as does its prohibition against rendering any lawful firearm in the home operable for the purpose of immediate self-defense. Assuming that Heller is not disqualified from the exercise of Second Amendment rights, the District must permit him to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in the home."

"We are aware of the problem of handgun violence in this country, and we take seriously the concerns raised by the many amici who believe that prohibition of handgun ownership is a solution. The Constitution leaves the District of Columbia a variety of tools for combating that problem, including some measures regulating handguns, see supra, at 54–55, and n. 26. But the enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices off the table. These include the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home. Undoubtedly some think that the Second Amendment is outmoded in a society where our standing army is the pride of our Nation, where well-trained police forces provide personal security, and where gun violence is a serious problem. That is perhaps debatable, but what is not debatable is that it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct."

We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.

29 posted on 01/16/2013 7:46:05 PM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson