“I’m disappointed that you’ve bought into this ‘conversation’ stuff.”
Actually, I’m more interested in a conversation among those on our side of the issue.
Stipulated: “The right of the people to keep and bear arms” pre-exists and does not depend on the US Constitution even though it is stated in and protected by that document. An owner of real property has no such clearly stated right in regard to real property. Obviously, a real property owner may not rightfully prevent one of the people to “keep and bear arms” while on the real property owner’s real property.
If you are “not at all for arguing, conversing about, the ins and outs of what the Second Amendment is...”, your possibly helpful thoughts on the above stipulation may remain unknown to others who would be helped by them.
The 4th Amendment and its unreasonable search and SEIZURE protection affirms property rights. Especially so when in the case of arms the second amendment affirms the right. There is no question at all here for me