French Weekly to Publish Life of Mohammed Comics

Arutz Sheva ^ | 30/12/12 | Rachel Hirshfeld

[Eleutheria5]

Shocked by Mad Mo's public hair? Throw some firebombs through the air. Paris, City of bright Lights Is home to folks who ain't too bright.

[Army Air Corps]

Charlie Hebdo shall do this? Something tells me that it will “enrage Muslims.”

[Army Air Corps]

Gallic ping.

[tet68]

I see Auto-flambe in their future.

Gutzy guys at Charlie Hebdo.

[Eleutheria5]

As long as you’re going to enrage them, go for the gold. Can’t wait for the picture of Mad Mo smearing whip cream all over his nine-year-old bride.

[Army Air Corps]

More Chutzpah than the average American presstitute.

[BfloGuy]

You can say a lot about the French [and you’d probably be right] but you’ve got to give them some credit for standing up for their culture.

[null and void]

“The only thing we are doing is transferring the text to images,” he said, adding that he doesn’t think that “higher Muslim minds could find anything inappropriate” with the content.

Oui. Now eef only vee can find zese "highyar muslim minds"...

[Army Air Corps]

Indeed. By the way, what, pray tell, does NOT enrage Mohammedans?

[allendale]

That editor has courage. You will never see any such work in an American publication. However American editors “fearlessly” will rip the Pope, Catholic and Christian figures on a regular basis.

[Eleutheria5]

I think one was that Muslim kid holding up a sign saying that “free speech does not equal (math symbol) insulting prophet Muhammed”. Certainly makes sense, in a Rogain-starved assertion sort of way.

[353FMG]

None are as gutsy in the ‘Home of the Brave’.

[Army Air Corps]

American presstitutes only have “courage” to attack Christians because we tend not strap explosives to ourselves and make a human flambe.

[Eleutheria5]

Also Jewish figures. Dunno why they don’t go after Buddhist and Hindu figures. They don’t burn things down and riot, either.

[bigbob]

[Eleutheria5]

I don’t recommend experimenting with real, live Muslims until you find something that actually doesn’t enrage them. Safe to assume that any damned thing can and will enrage them, given the wrong/right circumstances.

[PubliusMM]

“...he doesn’t think that “higher Muslim minds could find anything inappropriate” with the content.”

No such thing as a ‘higher muslim mind’...they are all inbred, seventh-century barbarians adhering VERY closely to the lunatic ravings of their pedophile prophet.

My guess is that this will spawn some more violent muzzie responses...if history serves as a guide.

[Jack Hydrazine]

Let’s make Mohammed Cookies!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f7_O9x65E0

[Cicero]

Well, there’s no such thing as a tolerant Muslim.

And pictures of Mohammed are absolutely forbidden. So there’s no way this can be acceptable, no matter who writes the text or what it says.

[elcid1970]

“Vive la France!”

And I will toast that sentiment with a glass of red wine & a slice of summer sausage (pork, of course).

O Muslims! Our infidel bullets are lubed with pig grease!

;^)