Shocked by Mad Mo's public hair? Throw some firebombs through the air. Paris, City of bright Lights Is home to folks who ain't too bright.
To: Eleutheria5
Charlie Hebdo shall do this? Something tells me that it will “enrage Muslims.”
2 posted on
12/30/2012 2:00:42 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Cincinna
3 posted on
12/30/2012 2:01:49 PM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Eleutheria5
I see Auto-flambe in their future.
Gutzy guys at Charlie Hebdo.
4 posted on
12/30/2012 2:02:18 PM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Eleutheria5
You can say a lot about the French [and you’d probably be right] but you’ve got to give them some credit for standing up for their culture.
7 posted on
12/30/2012 2:05:59 PM PST by
BfloGuy
(Workers and consumers are, of course, identical.)
To: Eleutheria5
“The only thing we are doing is transferring the text to images,” he said, adding that he doesn’t think that “higher Muslim minds could find anything inappropriate” with the content. Oui. Now eef only vee can find zese "highyar muslim minds"...
8 posted on
12/30/2012 2:06:11 PM PST by
null and void
(Socialism: Equal parts dumb and evil, in a blender.)
To: Eleutheria5
That editor has courage. You will never see any such work in an American publication. However American editors “fearlessly” will rip the Pope, Catholic and Christian figures on a regular basis.
To: Eleutheria5
15 posted on
12/30/2012 2:13:05 PM PST by
bigbob
To: Eleutheria5
“...he doesn’t think that “higher Muslim minds could find anything inappropriate” with the content.”
No such thing as a ‘higher muslim mind’...they are all inbred, seventh-century barbarians adhering VERY closely to the lunatic ravings of their pedophile prophet.
My guess is that this will spawn some more violent muzzie responses...if history serves as a guide.
17 posted on
12/30/2012 2:15:02 PM PST by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Still seeking change.)
To: Eleutheria5
18 posted on
12/30/2012 2:25:02 PM PST by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Eleutheria5
Well, there’s no such thing as a tolerant Muslim.
And pictures of Mohammed are absolutely forbidden. So there’s no way this can be acceptable, no matter who writes the text or what it says.
19 posted on
12/30/2012 2:30:50 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Eleutheria5
Please tell me they got someone like R Crumb to write this
21 posted on
12/30/2012 2:57:34 PM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
To: Eleutheria5
On facebook, a poster calling himself "No Dog but Allah" posts cartoons like this, which I think would be very similar.
22 posted on
12/30/2012 3:06:46 PM PST by
jmcenanly
("The more corrupt the state, the more laws." Tacitus, Publius Cornelius)
To: Eleutheria5
I think it would be funny to make Mohammed comics that would circulate on the Internet underground. Published (unauthorized) by the Democratic National Committee, DNC comics would be less charitable to Mohammed or Islam.
Various stories could begin with caricature narration from well known Democrats. For instance, Harry Reid could narrate the story of how Mohammed sodomized his first goat.
To: Eleutheria5
Of course it’s going to piss the muskies off. Making pictures of the Big Muskie is out of bounds to them. Expect more firebombs.
27 posted on
12/30/2012 3:23:52 PM PST by
taxesareforever
(Islam is an ideology. It is NOT a religion.)
To: Eleutheria5
Iwould say that the French are beginning the PUSH BACK.
30 posted on
12/30/2012 7:01:58 PM PST by
Chickensoup
(Leftist Totalitarian Fascism coming to a country like yours.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
