Marriage equality exists today. It existed yesterday. And 100 years before that.
I’m not bothered about John Doe being straight, gay, confused, bisexual, asexual, or acrobatic. If he wishes to marry a female he can have at it and equality with every other marriage in recorded history will be instantaneous and automatic.
But John Doe’s desire to ‘marry’ Joe Sixpack is an impossibility because marriage already has a definition and John/Joe ain’t it.
I can call a giraffe a dog but that won’t make it bark.
When my wife and I were first married, she continued her work as a costume maker for a few years. Of course costumes are used in the theater, and a huge percentage of the people in the theater are - gay.
The funniest thing to me was the homosexual “couples.” I never saw one that wasn't ‘husband’ and ‘wife.’ Whether male or female, there was always one that was clearly the ‘husband’ and one that was clearly the ‘wife.’
So when I hear these gay activists going on about how, “they are just like us” my thought is always, “yes you are, but you are totally confused.” Why a man would want another man to act and behave like a wife - when he could have an actual wife, is beyond comprehension. Ditto for a woman choosing to have another woman act like a man and take care of her, when she could have an actual man, is equally stupid.
If two gay guys both acted like husbands, or two gay women both acted like wives - maybe it could be called homosexual marriage. But right now all it can be called is confused and mixed-up as hell people play acting.
browbeating the public with it and braiwashing kids in schools on it, is something we will NEVER EVER accept
But John Does desire to marry Joe Sixpack is an impossibility because marriage already has a definition and John/Joe aint it.
I can call a giraffe a dog but that wont make it bark.”
WELL SAID. And do NOT teach my grandchildren that this is normal because it is NOT normal for a man/man or woman/woman to be married. What marriage next?