Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aimhigh

They will model their concealed-carry statute on New York City’s rules. Don’t expect “shall issue” CCW to come from this.


4 posted on 12/11/2012 10:47:01 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
PapaBear3625 said: Don’t expect “shall issue” CCW to come from this.

I certainly do. I see no indication in Heller or McDonald which would allow the government to decide whether any individual had a good reason to bear arms. Such individuals have a RIGHT to bear arms and need provide no reason.

Illinois may attempt to create widespread "sensitive places" and they may attempt to create classes of people who can't get a permit. These issues will have to be litigated again, perhaps, but the vast majority of people are going to get permits.

11 posted on 12/11/2012 11:47:28 AM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
They will model their concealed-carry statute on New York City’s rules. Don’t expect “shall issue” CCW to come from this.

One step at a time. Next step is challenging "may issue".

13 posted on 12/11/2012 12:16:03 PM PST by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

“They will model their concealed-carry statute on New York City’s rules. Don’t expect “shall issue” CCW to come from this.”

I disagree. Of course Illannoy will do what they can to frustrate the right to bear arms, but the may-issue game is about to die as well; there is a court decision in MD that is turning that game on it’s ear.

More importantly, the culture has shifted. Guns are very popular right now and politicians outside of the bluest areas aren’t interested in getting in the way.


22 posted on 12/11/2012 7:10:19 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Getting in touch with my inner rebel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625

they’ll make it so expensive and so much paper work there that many will say screw this


23 posted on 12/11/2012 7:35:31 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson