Replies

Not sure how its absurd to ask a question while engaging in a discussion. There are websites that simply live off of false claims made by conservatives. Continuing to use false statements simply hurts the cause and makes can cause good points (like the amount of black on white crime vs amount of white on black crime) to be ignored.

When the Tea Party marched on Washington, some conservatives were posting images that were clearly proven to be from the Million Man March. When some tried to make the correction, they were attacked in the same (”jackass”/ “absurd”) manner that seems to be happening here.

Don’t confuse a desire for strong factually correct conservative arguments as some sort of liberal troll attack.

First the claim was made that most whites that are murdered are murdered by blacks which is simply not true.

Then the point was made that blacks are “39 times” more likely to do such and such, and now you are saying at least “10 times”. So we have one factually incorrect statement, and two other statements that vary between factors of ten and 39.

How about someone post or link the latest statistics based on race and we can all see for ourselves that yes, blacks attack whites more than the other way around, and yes whites are responsible for more rapes, murders, etc of their fellow whites than blacks are.

Go look up the statistics yourself. Inter-racial crime and violence is a one way street. I hope you are intelligent enough to see this much at least. But look here to learn something>>>>>>>

But in fact, white-on-black crime is a statistical rarity. According to data from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), an estimated 320,082 whites were victims of black violence in 2010, while 62,593 blacks were victims of white violence. That same year, according to the Census Bureau, the white and black populations in the U.S. were 196,817,552 and 37,685,848, respectively. Whites therefore committed acts of interracial violence at a rate of 32 per 100,000, while the black rate was 849 per 100,000. In other words, the “average” black was statistically 26.5 times more likely to commit criminal violence against a white, than vice versa. Moreover, blacks who committed violent crimes chose white victims 47.7% of the time, whereas whites who committed violent crimes targeted black victims only 3.9% of the time.

For many years and for a wide variety of crimes, this pattern has been among the most consistent findings of criminal-justice research. Nationwide in 2010, there were approximately 67,755 black-on-white aggravated asaults, as compared to just 1,748 white-on-black crimes of the same description. Thus, blacks committed acts of interracial aggravated assault at a rate of 181 per 100,000—fully 201 times higher than the white rate of 0.9 per 100,000. Moreover, blacks guilty of aggravated assault chose white victims 44.1% of the time, while whites who committed aggravated assault selected black victims only six-tenths of 1% of the time.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1628

First the claim was made that most whites that are murdered are murdered by blacks which is simply not true.

You are correct on this but is an irrelevant point. Also true is that blacks are preying on their own more often than on whites (murder rape assault) but so what because>>>

In the racially charged America of today what makes headlines and gets people angry and making big crusades (like w Trayvon Martin) is inter-racial crime. Not crime within the black race or the white race. And contrary to what the mass media and the black& white liberal race agitators want you to believe, the crime statistics show black on white crime to be way out of proportion to white on black on black crime.