Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/25/2012 10:50:49 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet
There is no such thing as gay marriage. You can't change the definition to fit the circumstance.

And by the way....a fetus is a living human being.

2 posted on 11/25/2012 10:55:07 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Goodbye DOMA.


3 posted on 11/25/2012 10:56:20 AM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So all this talk about how homosexuals just want to get married because they love one another just like a normal man and woman is bunk. What it really comes down do is “Benifits”. Typical parasite leaches. It’s always about what can goverment do for me.


4 posted on 11/25/2012 10:57:22 AM PST by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; wagglebee

The will of the people be dammed and so will this nation.


5 posted on 11/25/2012 10:57:29 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Cunninghis”

you can’t make this stuff up


6 posted on 11/25/2012 11:01:40 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A lesbian named “Cunninghus”??


7 posted on 11/25/2012 11:02:00 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It's just a matter of time. Equal protection jurisprudence is such that we will have gay marriage (via the SCOTUS), sooner or later. If nothing else changes, it is only a question of precisely when.

The only way to prevent that from happening is a Federal Constitutional amendment prohibiting same sex marriage and excepting it from the equal protection clause. Individual state statutes, state constitutional provisions, or even federal statutes (such as DOMA) will all fall in time, absent a Federal Constitutional amendment.

Since no one is willing to get underway with such a constitutional amendment, sit back and enjoy, cause here it comes!

8 posted on 11/25/2012 11:02:48 AM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Revolting cat!; wagglebee
Karen Golinski and Amy Cunninghis got married during the brief window in 2008 when gay and lesbian couples could tie the knot in California. Golinski immediately tried to add her wife to her employer-sponsored health care plan. But because she is married to another woman and works for the U.S. government, her otherwise routine request was denied

Is this pink journalista for AssPress trying to make the case for polygamy?

Or the expansion of divorce/remarriage laws or WHUT?!!!

9 posted on 11/25/2012 11:03:15 AM PST by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Once again the will of the people means nothing. Our morality will be dictated to us by black robes and we have NO way to change it.

Tell me again why secession is a bad idea?


13 posted on 11/25/2012 11:22:59 AM PST by DwFry (Baby Boomers Killed Western Civilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Doubtless, CJ Roberts will go through more perverted twists and turns to determine that DOMA equates to a discriminatory “tax” directed at gays and lesbians and the law will be struck down.

Remember, with zero, the rule of law is dead and the Constitution has been shredded. He will do as Morsi has done to make himself Supreme Ruler ewhose word IS the law and he has his crooked friend, Eric Holder, in DOJ to back him up.

And, because Americans have become so complacent and lost their passion for liberty and freedom, we won’t care what zero and the government do as lond as we don’t miss the next episode of American Idol.

Hello new pop star, goodbye, America!


15 posted on 11/25/2012 11:30:42 AM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Karen Golinski and Amy Cunninghis"?
16 posted on 11/25/2012 11:34:48 AM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So lets get ready to put our polygamists and house pets on our family policy.


19 posted on 11/25/2012 11:39:43 AM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let’s hope that the current SCOTUS looks at the earlier courts decision against polygamy in the 1800s. Those courts pretty much decided marriage was defined as one man/one woman.


20 posted on 11/25/2012 12:02:45 PM PST by sigzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers; Patriots

FR really needs your help!

Please Contribute Today.

FReepathon Day 56!

21 posted on 11/25/2012 1:13:03 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The federal appeals courts send an average of some 8,000 cases on appeal to the SCOTUS every year, though even with consolidation of cases, the SCOTUS can only hear a few dozen.

This bottleneck means that the vast majority of those cases will revert to the decisions made by the appeals courts, resulting in a whole bunch of bad law. But it will be years of bad law, in most cases, until the issue gets a chance to be heard again.


22 posted on 11/25/2012 1:50:56 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Marriage is a license granted by states. The feds shouldn’t have anything to do with it, one way or another.


32 posted on 11/25/2012 6:45:54 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

34 posted on 11/26/2012 9:06:24 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Golinski immediately tried to add her wife to her employer-sponsored health care plan.

Here is most of the impetus for "gay marriage" -- being able to add your gay partner on your employer health plan.

35 posted on 11/26/2012 9:09:58 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson