Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forward! To mass layoffs!
Human Events ^ | 11/8/2012 07:58 AM | John Hayward

Posted on 11/08/2012 9:48:06 AM PST by Red Steel

Obamanomics grinds grimly onward,  as CNBC brings word that on the day after the election, “Boeing announced a major restructuring of its defense division on Wednesday that will cut 30 percent of management jobs from 2010 levels, close facilities in California, and consolidate several business units to cut costs.”  It was sweet of them to keep that under wraps until after the election, wasn’t it?

And that’s not even the dreaded “sequestration” layoffs, which Obama broke the law to convince defense contractors to keep under wraps until after the election.  Those are yet to come.  The upside to living in a banana Republic with Party-dominated media is that life is full of “unexpected” surprises, to use the word that has come to dominate economic news in the Obama era.

Another round of layoffs announced on Wednesday came from Hawker Beechcraft, which announced it would close facilities in Arkansas, Arizona, and Texas, resulting in 400 jobs lost, while another 170 jobs would be cut from corporate offices in Kansas and Arkansas.

Also on the day after the election, the CEO of the Papa John’s pizza restaurant chain, John Schnatter, told a small community college audience in Florida that ObamaCare would likely result in cuts to employee hours by franchise owners seeking to escape the law’s mandates by eliminating full-time positions, a move he described as “common sense” and “lose-lose.”

Schnatter also predicted ObamaCare would add between $5 million and $8 million to his business costs (which is fine, because he’s an evil rich guy who supported Mitt Romney for president, and we all know that truly patriotic job creators happily pay for increased business costs out of their own pockets) and that it would add 10 to 14 cents to the cost of his pizzas, which is a bummer, but under Obamanomics theory is totally unrelated to the process of extracting that “fair share” from idle plutocrats.  Then he headed off to help out with a telethon for Hurricane Sandy victims and write the Red Cross a million-dollar check, but we all know that private charity is irrelevant, as only Big Government can save us from big storms.

The Huffington Post relays the thoughts of Fox Business Network corresponded Charlie Gasparino, who says Wall Street executives are “in mourning” after Obama’s re-election, because “they know that Wall Street is going to lay off a lot more people.”  About 10,000 of them by the end of the year, in fact, if the New York state comptroller’s estimate is accurate.  It’s not a big deal though, because those people are evil.  Everyone knows that investment capital and consumer loans should be redistributed by selfless government agencies, not greedy bankers.

According to Gasparino, things could look up if “Republicans and Democrats happen to reach a long-term budget deal similar to Simpson-Bowles,” which could mean “the market is going to go through the roof” to “Dow 20,000, easy.”  But he knows perfectly well that’s not going to happen.  We’ll more likely get the usual: big tax increases right now, combined with vague promises of largely symbolic spending cuts at some indeterminate point in the future.

Once the sequestration cuts and financial industry devastation are done, the real action to watch in the job market next year will be the transition of full-time workers to part-time.  That’s a very attractive option for escaping from ObamaCare and reducing payroll costs, without producing headline-grabbing mass layoffs (executives don’t like giving the impression their companies are terminally ill) or depriving operations of needed labor altogether.  As a New York Times article noted in October, it’s increasingly easy for service companies (which accounted for the bulk of job creation in the last pre-election employment report) to do, using “sophisticated software that tracks the flow of customers, allowing managers to assign just enough employees to handle the anticipated demand.”  It’s a trend that’s been developing for a long time, but there are now powerful incentives accelerating it.

The result “has been a bane to many workers, pushing many into poverty and forcing some onto food stamps and Medicaid. And with work schedules that change week to week, workers can find it hard to arrange child care, attend college or hold a second job.”  Fortunately, there are lots of food stamps to give away here in the New Normal, and it’s likely that pleas for more extensive government-provided child care to assist America’s part-time workforce would not fall upon deaf ears.

Update: An anonymous business owner in Las Vegas told talk-radio host Kevin Wall he fired 22 of his 114 employees on the day after President Obama’s re-election because “elections have consequences” and “at the end of the day, I need to survive.”  He said this was necessary to “make sure I have enough money to cover the payroll taxes and the additional health care I’m gonna have to do.”

“Well unfortunately, and most of my employees are Hispanic — I’m not gonna go into what kind of company I have, but I have mostly Hispanic employees — well unfortunately we know what happened and I can’t wait around anymore, I have to be proactive,” the businessman continued.  ”I had to lay off 22 people today to make sure that my business is gonna thrive and I’m gonna be around for years to come.  I have to build up that nest egg now for the taxes and regulations that are coming my way.  Elections do have consequences, but so do choices.  A choice you make every day has consequences and you know what, I’ve always put my employees first, but unfortunately today I have to put me and my family first, and you watch what’s gonna happen.  I’m just one guy with 114 employees — well was 114 employees — watch what happens in the next six months.  The Dow alone lost 314 points today. There’s a tsunami coming and if you didn’t think this election had consequences, just wait.”

The entire conversation can be heard by clicking this link.

Updated: FreedomWorks has an extensive list of even more post-election layoffs resulting directly from Obama policies.   Among the bigger names: Welch-Allyn, Dana Holding Corporation, Stryker, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic.  The confirmed post-election jobs death toll from this list stands at 5,263 jobs, but much more are on the way, including a 5 percent cut in the huge Stryker workforce, a probably comparable reduction of Dana’s even larger staff, and talk of jobs being sent to China.  The transition to part-time labor I mentioned above is also discussed.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: jobs; layoffs; obamanomics; obamasizing; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Jane Long

Yep, miss people with character, though if the pollsters want em, let them have it. Frankly, I would like the U.S. government to go bankrupt at this point, let the religions and private organizations play the hero, and let people rabidly turn on everything rediculous that the left offers, plus remind them that they ran out of money to hand out to them.


61 posted on 11/08/2012 11:10:26 AM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

If Democrats were consistent, but they are not. They are masters of intrigue.


62 posted on 11/08/2012 11:10:40 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (cat dog, cat dog, alone in the world is a little cat dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: soycd
>> why do you think Gary Johnson, a virtual unknown, got ~1% of the presidential vote?
>
>Because there are ignorant boneheads voting that don’t understand how much damage the rats can do.

Ah, and we can count on the Republicans to stand up to them, to limit their damage? Like they stood up to actions in Lybia? Or like they really pushed Fast & Furious which, by the way, is State Sponsored Terrorism? Or like they've been pushing for balanced budgets? (Hell, the reason Rand Paul made a splash in the news was because he had a budget.) Or how it really supported the TEA party candidates from 2010? [That should be read w/ sarcasm; also remember NY-23, where the GOP endorsed the Democrat over the TEA party candidate that won the primary.]

The Republican party is literally useless if it will not do as it says it will.
Why do you want my vote to be wasted?

Between these idiots and the “principled conservative” that protested by not voting because they could not get skittles with their pony, we now have to deal with a much bigger mess.

No, the offering by the GOP was a liberal, a statist, a socialist; how can it possibly be a win to replace 'their' lizard with 'our' lizard?
And don't give me that BS about the rest of the party holding his feet to the fire, we both know that's a load.

Cowards and traitors.

The only cowards and traitors are those who betray their conscience to go with the flow for fear of ridicule at 'being different'.

63 posted on 11/08/2012 11:15:24 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

We might believe you are a trifle educated if you spelled Libya correctly.


64 posted on 11/08/2012 11:16:06 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (cat dog, cat dog, alone in the world is a little cat dog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
We might believe you are a trifle educated if you spelled Libya correctly.

Damn my dyslexic fingers!

65 posted on 11/08/2012 11:18:06 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: djf
HOW IS IT THAT URGING COMPANIES TO VIOLATE FEDERAL LAW IS NOT AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE???????

Duh, He is a democrat. Laws do not apply to rats.

66 posted on 11/08/2012 11:20:56 AM PST by Drill Thrawl (We have crossed the line from independence & liberty to dependency & servitude. We are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

Mark for later.


67 posted on 11/08/2012 11:22:56 AM PST by DonnerT (After all is said and done, it is God's Will that will be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I have already stopped spending more than $200 a month by cancelling services: some cable, gym, lawn and pest control, home phone services...have been asked every time WHY...and I’ve told them, “Yesterday’s election. We had a chance to go in the right direction, and things went differently. So I am cutting my spending.”

Almost every person I spoke too understood my reasoning, expressed sympathy, and agreed with me.


68 posted on 11/08/2012 11:26:02 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

husband works for Caterpillar in the coal mining division. Yesterday, we took inventory of our nest eggs, debts and goals. We know we’ll be a one-income household very soon. they’ve already started laying off workers in October. Very little hope anything changes for the better.


69 posted on 11/08/2012 11:36:17 AM PST by JenB987 (I'm still an American and 'til they take that away from me there's no day ruined. - El Rushbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Same here. My wife just canceled the lady who has cleanes our house for over 10 year (rabid Obama supporter), and I cancel our newspaper (San Jose Mercury News). I also downgraded our Comcast Internet from their Blast service to their basic service, saving a bit more. All told, we cut more than $300 a month on our spending.


70 posted on 11/08/2012 11:39:18 AM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I have already stopped spending more than $200 a month by cancelling services: some cable, gym, lawn and pest control, home phone services...have been asked every time WHY...and I’ve told them, “Yesterday’s election. We had a chance to go in the right direction, and things went differently. So I am cutting my spending.”
Almost every person I spoke too understood my reasoning, expressed sympathy, and agreed with me.

It's good that they can see/empathize... but I really have to question the validity of "we had a chance to go in the right direction" claim. Restricting ourselves to the two main parties, Romney was a signal to people for 'status quo', and so was Obama. They're both socialists, both statists, and both liberals. So there was never any intent on the part of the GOP to get things done [that would change things], and indeed Romney was pushed for the primaries. (Remember the rule-changes, the refusal to seat delegates, and the bus circling incidents at the convention? Or the Ron Paul wins in the primaries, due to his supporters successfully rule-lawyering their position that were retroactively invalidated? Or the several states where Romney was declared winner, until the next primary was well underway?)

There was never any intent other than to talk a good game and "be electable", which is why he lost.

71 posted on 11/08/2012 11:39:56 AM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Think about it—Carter asked Americans to sacrifice by putting on their sweaters.

It was laughable but downright statesman-like by today’s standards.

Today the politicians want to steal somebody else’s fuel—their fallback position would be to steal the sweater.


72 posted on 11/08/2012 11:44:31 AM PST by cgbg (HLM--"Democracy is the theory that people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

cleanes => cleaned


73 posted on 11/08/2012 11:47:30 AM PST by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: preacher
"Recent Layoffs - Look at this mess Obama is inheriting.'

He didn't inherit this mess - HE CAUSED IT!!

74 posted on 11/08/2012 11:52:45 AM PST by LADY J (You never know how strong you are until being strong is the only choice you have. - Author Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Ha, ha! Yep. And Barry Obama told us to ‘put air in our tires’ and to ‘stop using ATMs.’

But to your point, barry and friends want us to sacrifice by being okay with DEATH PANELS. Under president urkle my 96 yo grandfather would not have gotten that hip replacement and lived out the final 2 years of his life in excruciating pain.


75 posted on 11/08/2012 11:55:28 AM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: djf
These management types at Boeing have the cash and the connections and know the law firms that could make zero have a really, really bad hair day!

You're not serious? The rule of law means nothing to Obama or the S.C. If Obama decided to crush Boeing or any company, he could do it in a heartbeat. The MSM would provide cover and he would just ignore the courts.

Remember the District judge ruled against his Administration over the moratorium in the Gulf -- he just ignored the ruling.

We will go through dark times over the next few years.

76 posted on 11/08/2012 11:56:50 AM PST by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AUJenn

“As a taxpayer, she was outraged.”

Yet she is a Dem that perpetuates this behaviour. She was on Suze O’s show and they were both yucking it up and fawning over O.


77 posted on 11/08/2012 11:57:51 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The greatest Ponzi scheme in the world’s history is about to come crashing down..

Not by a long shot. The elites are evil, but not dumb. They will expend much energy managing the decline such that it takes place over decades.

There will likely not be a "collapse" but a long process of decay.

The elites of D.C. will continue to impoverish America with their sadistic rules and regulations and higher taxes.

78 posted on 11/08/2012 12:04:29 PM PST by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

Why bother? Report it at what it really is 12% or whatever (U3, not the really true U6 number). All you have to do is lower it some two or three months before the election. No one will care what it is now.


79 posted on 11/08/2012 12:04:39 PM PST by tnlibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

He had zero evidence that she stole anything. Both were total losers. As baby mama was exiting, she lamented his ‘convicted drug dealer’ status and said, “but I still love him!” Gag!


80 posted on 11/08/2012 12:25:18 PM PST by AUJenn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson