#61 on Premiere Magazine's 100 Greatest Movie Characters of All Time.
What do liberals know about Rush Limbaugh that's honest? Nothing.
Mr. Better Off Dead still stiffing the paperboy.
Will liberals want to see a movie about Rush at all? No.
Looks like a winner. Spend as much of your own money on it as you can, Cusack.
This will go over as well as when Henry Winkler tried it back in the 1990s. Don’t remember that? That’s all you need to know.
Oh you know, they’ll hit the stereotypes....fat, sexist, racist, hypocrite et al Then they’ll dwell on the Rx drugs, multiple marriages . . . won’t be hard for them to make anything up since Rush is a public figure
The Left loves making these dogs, that nobody goes to see.
Their hope is that they’ll eventually be aired on cable hundreds of times, and ultimately be watched by ten people.
I think they’re being overly optimistic.
Reagan
Limgaugh
Yep, who is the audience? I won’t be watching them. The Left won’t want to.
Actually, Cusack is one of my favorite actors. This intrigues me. My guess is he will probably try a “Citizen Kane” type approach to portraying Limbaugh. Cusack is aging and probably is having trouble finding his typical romanic comedy roles. He knows he has to try something different for his career to survive.
Sounds like they’re gearing up for a huge conservative smear campaign in the post-0bama era, which we are about to experience in a mere 4 days.
Not many people know that during Rush Limbaugh’s peak, before other republicans had shows, Hollywood made a sit-com with a Rush character as the lead, Henry Winkler.
It should have been a smash hit, with just the portion of viewers from his 22 million radio listeners alone, but Hollywood made a strange(just kidding) and costly mistake, they made Rush the loser, the butt of the humor, a buffoon.
Who could have predicted that a show geared to the people with no interest in Rush, his show, his fresh political insights, or why he was a media phenomena, and designed to mock, and repulse the natural audience for the show, the millions of potential viewers who were the only reason for the show to be made, would fail.
Monique Junot: I figured if we had nothing to say to each other he would get bored; go away. But instead he uses it as an excuse to put his testicles all over me.
Lane Myer: Excuse me?
Monique Junot: You know, like octopus? Testicles?
Lane Myer: Ohhhh. Tentacles. N-T. Tentacles; big Difference.
Aside from the fact that it will obviously be a hit piece, I think it’s a little weird to do a biopic of somebody who is still living.
lol. We will see how much this film makes. Obama 2016 made 32 million. Although tempting to see it (as a comedy of course) I will not give a dime towards this movie even though John Cusack is a pretty decent actor.
I anticipate 5 minutes spent on Rush’s radio success and 85 minutes on his drug problem.
Cusack, the man that is proof flesh can be drier than toast. He is got to be the most boring ‘actor’ in hollywierd.
John Cusack as Rush?
No. Just no. Just for starters, he would die trying to make weight for the part
This reminds me of Oliver Stone’s movie on George W.
I think the title was “W”...
No, I never watched it and I have no intention to watch it in the future.
Michael Medved reviewed “W”...Medved stated that the film portrayed George W. as very pathetic person...