Skip to comments.Mother murdered son for “failing to learn the Koran”
Posted on 11/01/2012 1:21:00 PM PDT by Olog-hai
A mother murdered her young son and set his body on fire when he struggled to learn the Koran off by heart, a court has heard.
Sara Ege used a stick to beat seven-year-old Yaseen like a dog if he couldnt recite passages from the Islamic text.
The beatings were so brutal that the boy died from his injuries, and his mother tried to burn the body to destroy the evidence, Cardiff Crown Court was told.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
I thought Britain had accepted sharia law... what’s the problem?
Wow. In the UK. How... not surprising.
Now it may be too late to avoid the likes of this happening on American soil. I hope I’m wrong.
What else do you expect from a way of thinking whose main tenets are encouraging people to steal, kill and destroy?
You’re OK with child abuse?
Islam is not a “gene pool”. There are Muslims across most of the world’s races. And children can’t choose this. Adults are a different story.
*-= Hussein is Happee =-*
Those Welsh ...
Stone age barbarians!
I'm ok with the crazy islamist witch removing her genetic contribution to the race. She needs to be next.
If the kid had lived, he'd be a well trained jihadist. Sucks to be him, either way.
I don't have to like or be ok with either outcome, but I do have to recognize reality.
The world will never be at peace, until that “ROP” is eradicated from the face of the world.
Intereting it’s the woman(mother) who did the islamic honor killing of the boy. I chuckle in reading & understanding few of the sahih hadieths that say muslim females are deficient both in intelligence & religion. Since their women r deficient intelligence why would they raise children partiucally boys? However, love it ... seems to be a spiral death trap of islam in general.
What “race”? There is no Islamic “race”.
How does opposing child abuse allow jihadists to “win”, though? The very death of this child is rather the “victory” (as it were) for jihadists. That’s the point: the child would not have lived thanks to the actions of this mother (loosely-termed) no matter what, and being cavalier towards jihad resulted in the child’s death.
Dang! And I thought the Sisters of Saint Joseph were tough disciplinarians! Thank You Jesus, for making me Catholic!
Seriously, Islam is a pitiful excuse as a (I refuse to call it religion) form of government...
No, Islam will not consume itself in this manner without us needing to defend ourselves against their jihad.
Her genetic contribution has been removed by her own hand.
Me being cavalier had NOTHING to do with the child's death. At all. You can knock that crap off right now.
Children are going to be abused. Mainly by jihadists. Either jihadi children or western children. Pick one.
You don't have to like it. I don't have to like it. It sucks. It's going to happen.
The sooner the jihadi are a memory, the sooner the abuse stops.
If she did this she is a slatternly demon.
Islam is a lie of the DEVIL. Evil to the core.
Islam has no patience with dyslexics.
I did not say you were cavalier. But saying “it’s going to happen” is, WADR, a cavalier attitude; we need to say “we’re going to stop it” instead. Also, “genetic contribution” has nothing to do with it, and there is no guarantee that the kid would have grown up a jihadist if he had lived; to say that he would have is to dismiss people like Mosab Hassan Yousef, who grew up in Hamas yet abandoned it and became a Christian while helping out Shin Bet in the process.
"If there are two things that characterize Islamic culture, they are terrorism and inbreeding. The latest research shows that these two things might be closely connected . . . First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations. Such marriages increase the risk of negative mental and physical consequences . . . Risk of mental retardation increases with 400 percent (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation). Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from blood related parents and that abilities related to social behavior and empathy develops slower in inbred babies (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children [pdf]). Such facts might make several pieces fall into place for many people . . . People with low intelligence (because of inbreeding) might also be easier to brainwash with fundamentalist Islam. "
No, we havent, Sharia law in the U........oh whats the point.
Throw the book at her a couple thousand times.
Yep, the UK has more or less abdicated to the Islamicists.
So what are you doing about it?
Please go into the muslim communitiy and tell them what to do.
Bollocks, my friend, bollocks
“If the jihadists win, it will be western children that are killed. Are you ok with that?”
No I am not okay with that. You are correct she did us all a favor.
Short of pacifying the jihadis, I don't see a solution, except protecting our own as best we can, and not getting in the way when they are doing the blue-on-blue dance.
Then what do you call it when people are imprisoned for criticizing Islam.
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
I’m not willing to generalize from a few dozen isolated events like this, each day, and conclude that the Religion of Peace is responsible for these honor killings. All cultures are equally valid, aren’t they?
I wonder if she’ll get off by simply claiming “Sharia Law”.
If I do, would you follow me in?
It’s bad enough that most with the power are too craven to act. At least it doesn’t escape the press.
The very attitude of “it’s going to happen anyway” is a win for jihad.
Whilst I agree with you about the dangers of impeding free speech, the gentleman, Darren Conway, is not quite the innocent you paint him out to be.
Firstly, he is BNP and has links to even more extreme British far-right groups. (I assume you know about the BNP if you dont know what the BNP stand for, you shouldnt be posting in a UK thread)
Secondly, you dont get 12 months in the UK for putting up posters. And certainly not as a first offender. You get 12 months if you have previous convictions. And Mr Conway has himself posted on RationalSkepticism.org that he had a previous charge of assault against him.
Thirdly, he deliberately plastered his windows with posters defaming Islam in pretty crude terms. Posters designed to be seen. He must have thought he couldnt be arrested as they were in his home. Clearly he isnt the brightest person.
Fourth, a quick check of the news on the old interaweb finds that Conway sacked his lawyer and represented himself. Again, not a smart move.
No, it hasnt.
An example here and there of idiocy does not a conquest make.
Conway was also found guilty of drug dealing.
Irrespective of the effects of inbreeding on any population, I respectfully submit that it would be a mistake to attribute fervent Islamic radicalism to a lack of education or intelligence. There is something else at play here that is much more unsettling.
I think that another sorry aspect of Islamism is that the "something else at play here that is much more unsettling" are those who take advantage of the victims of inbreeding.
Islamism's powerful faithful, mullahs and imams have their "72 virgins", their wealth and power here on Earth. They don't need the "heaven" urged upon the victims of inbreeding and the just plain poor and ignorant.
I do see a difference between Islamists (political Islam, sharia law advocates) and Muslims. I worked a few years with Muslims from Turkey including almost a year in Ankara.. years before the current Islamist AK Party government.