Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allendale
The biggest shift in Ohio is in the southern Ohio coal belt. 55-45 for Obama in 2008, now 60-40 for Romney

I can believe it but the area is not the heaviest population unfortunately. There will also be a dropoff in black turnout in the cities, which may or may not be factored in. Such changes are going to be real but difficult to predict numerically.

18 posted on 10/25/2012 1:41:32 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard; allendale
The biggest shift in Ohio is in the southern Ohio coal belt. 55-45 for Obama in 2008, now 60-40 for Romney

I can believe it but the area is not the heaviest population unfortunately.

I will be going on a hunting trip there on Nov. 7th (visiting my dad), and I can attest to the fact that it is very lightly populated. But, according to my Dad, it is very, very solid Romney.

42 posted on 10/25/2012 8:48:01 PM PDT by America_Right (I am no longer the 53%. Unemployment sucks! Time to write a book...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson