Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind

Sins of Omission “aka God’s blind spot”, are still sins. Lie to yourselves all you wish, you cannot lie to God.

Romney or Obama will be President. Not voting for Romney means you are voting for Obama by omission. Dress it up all you wish, you can answer to God for your sins.

Romney has stated he will rescind Barack Obama’s executive order authorizing US taxpayer fund to pay for overseas abortions.

But that single act alone a Romney Presidency will reduce the numbers of abortions.

There is NO other rational vote for any truly Christian voter. Your inaction empowers evil while your action would oppose it. Moral cowardice, not matter how carefully hidden in a fake gloss of morality, is till cowardice


83 posted on 10/19/2012 8:39:06 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

I’m voting for Romney, but will life-long Dem Billy do so?

It’s interesting that Billy voted for every piece of trash, abortion-loving Democrat for president until now, isn’t it?


89 posted on 10/19/2012 9:01:33 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie; ansel12
Romney or Obama will be President. Not voting for Romney means you are voting for Obama by omission

Listen, even for posters who believe this drivel, you seem completely ignorant about one little fact: The President is NOT elected by a popular vote.

The "omission" argument works in close races of any given candidate...but the POTUS race injects electoral votes into it. That means the POTUS race is 51 mini-races (50 states + D.C.)

And, since you're from Minnesota, let's use that state as one example:

Minnesota is a blue state...It and Illinois are two Midwestern blue states in which Obama will get 100% of the electoral votes.

Hold your breath until your face is first flush with red--before it turns blue -- but you won't be able (in 2012 anyway) to "wish" Minnesota "red."

Anybody voting for Romney in Illinois, Minnesota, the Left Coast, NJ-NY-CT, the D.C. corridor (that includes MD, Delaware) or New England's MA-RI-VT-Maine ... will garner how many electoral votes for Romney? [Answer? Absolutely Zero!]

Therefore...people who vote third party in Blue states (like MN) aren't withholding ANY electoral votes from Romney.

Even in the 28 or so clear red states (FL, NC, & VA have recently become "clear" red)...if 100% of FREEPERs voted for Virgil Goode...guess what? Obama would still have NO chance of winning ANY of those states.

So...in about 43 states + D.C...a non-vote for Romney (by voting for say, Virgil Goode) does NO ACTUAL electoral damage to Romney.

Dress up your fear-mongering about Obama all you want...the only true "anti-Obama" votes should occur in the seven genuine swing states...

94 posted on 10/19/2012 9:33:14 PM PDT by Colofornian ( >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson