The Unanswered Questions of this case:
—0f the 12 people in the conference room at the time of the shooting, three are dead, two were seriously injured and might not remember much, which leaves seven witnesses. 0nly one of these, a Professor Moriarity, has been publicly interviewed and has identified Bishop as the shooter. Where are the other interviews of survivors, and why haven’t three of the unharmed witnesses even been identified?
—Why did Amy Bishop repeatedly say “[b]It didn’t happen. There’s no way .... they are still alive[/b]” in the first interviews after her arrest? What did she mean by that?
—In the first hours after the shooting, the local newspapers website posted a photo of another person being led away in handcuffs from the scene. Who was this person, and why do commentators who did see this photo say it looked like a man wearing women’s clothing? Why was he/she carrying ‘shells’ in her/his pockets? Where did they come from? What caliber were they? Did they smell like they has recently been fired? Were all the expended shells from the shooting recovered at the crime scene?
—Is there any of the ubiquitous video evidence that is everywhere nowadays that places her at the scene? None has been released.
==Was Gun Shot Residue evidence found on her hands? Were her fingerprints found on the weapon recovered? Did the recovered weapon smell like it had recently been fired? Can all the slugs and expended shell cases be traced back to the weapon allegedly used?
—What was the motive? They have implied that Amy Bishop was angry over being denied tenure, but officially speaking they did not posit any motive. What did Amy herself have to say?
Angling to get off for reason of insanity?