Posted on 08/21/2012 12:38:58 AM PDT by STARWISE
Let's go there:
if Obama thinks he's losing, will he allow safe and fair elections on November 6? And if he does lose, will he peacefully turn over power to Mitt Romney on January 20, 2013? Or will he cling to power "by any means necessary," as a highly placed insider alleges?
*snip*
That's the question recently posed by retired Major General Jerry Curry in the Daily Caller, in light of horrifying reports that the Social Security Administration is buying 174,000 rounds of hollow-point bullets for distribution to 41 locations in the U.S.
According to Major General Curry, Social Security's ammo spree follows the purchase by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) of 46,000 rounds of hollow-point ammunition.
*snip*
Most terrifying of all, Major General Curry reports that the Department of Homeland Security ordered 750 million rounds of hollow-point ammunition in March, then subsequently ordered an additional 750 million rounds, including bullets capable of penetrating walls.
"This is enough ammunition to empty five rounds into the body of every living American citizen," ....
I strongly suggest that you read Major General Curry's article for yourself, so you can appreciate the full horror of what he describes. After pointing out that Congress has done nothing to investigate these weapon purchases, Major General Curry, a 40-year veteran, concludes with these chilling words:
This is a deadly serious business. I hope I'm wrong, but something smells rotten.
*snip*
So far, Obama has granted himself the right to control all transportation, including highways, airports, seaports, and railroads, and all modes of communication, storage facilities, electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I initially thought the title of this article was a typo with "Will" and "Obama" accidentally transposed. </sarc>
Here, let me fix that. "Obama Will Keep Power 'by Any Means Necessary!"
Now isn't that better?
answer: yes
Bookmarked
To be honest I have never heard that which you have used as an example.
That is as absurd as the tubby lesbo claiming “fire can’t melt steel” as her reason for claiming the aircraft did not bring down the Towers.
I suspect at least one goal of these large purchases is to put a dent in the supply of ammunition to citizens. (The FDA has put manufacturing limits on many types of medication causing significant shortages all across the country.) Obama could not get away with an executive order severely limiting the manufacturing and distribution of ammunition because it would be too obvious. There would be an uproar. What’s his alternative? Use the guise of national security and preparation for civil unrest. Buy a significant amount of ammo affecting the supply, causing shortages, raising prices, etc. If he can’t overrule the 2nd amendment, he can make it difficult and expensive to get ammunition. The General is right. Something smells.
Except in 2000, civilian government agencies hadn’t purchased enough rounds of ammo to shoot every citizen five times.
Except in 2000, civilian government agencies hadn’t purchased enough rounds of ammo to shoot every citizen five times.
Feds’ explanation of hollow point bullets raises more questions
August 18, 2012
Excerpt:
News reports indicating that multiple agencies of the federal government have ordered and are stockpiling multimillions of rounds of ammunition have pressured the Feds to offer an explanation. But the official explanation has only raised more questions.
On Friday the government stated that the hollow point bullets it has procured are “standard issue” and that they are used to train security agents used by each of the various federal agencies.
http://www.examiner.com/article/feds-explanation-of-hollow-point-bullets-raises-more-questions
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CNN Special Assignment: Secret Government Succession Plans
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgpgJPxenFo
Great trick except they are still out numbered.
Commercially there are about 6 Billion rounds manufactured in the US. This contract only represents a buy over 5 years so they are only affecting 0.03% of the market.
Not enough.
Oh, and there are another 1 billion rounds reloaded in the US each year so again, they don’t have the numbers.
There’s no doubt in my mind if he loses and refuses to leave the republicans will REALLY. And they may even call for hearings.
Received your message and replied. I also had some messages ‘disappear’ and was quite concerned about it, and then I discovered that I was accidently ticking the little box that says ‘delete message’ ... fast fingers can do that. So now I’m more careful.
Their claim is Bush set explosives in the buildings even claiming you could see the windows blow out from the explosives as the buildings came down.
To believe this monumental piece of nonsense you would have to believe a conspiracy so HUGE and far reaching as as close to impossible as is possible. Have you any idea the thousands of people involved in the investigation of the tragedy? No way can that many people keep a secret such as you seem to be implying was done.
As for the windows blowing out. A fire inside a house or other building without a collapse can blow windows out just as extreme heat without a fire can blow the windows out of a closed up car on an extremely hot day. Plus as the buildings compressed (collapsed) the downward force caused the windows to blow outward as the atmosphere inside the bldgs was forced outward by pressure.
Self ping
You cannot name any “conspiracy theory” coming from the right, completely devoid of any kind of facts and so absolutely ridiculous only a complete loon would believe it, with these kind of numbers or anywhere near 35% believe it.
Your entire premise that both sides have equal share of nuts is completely flawed.
Technically, you are correct; however, he has already issued some executive orders and done some things that are completely unconstitutional and the GOP controlled House seems completely impotent to hold him accountable for it. If he can get away with it, he’ll do it.
The equal sharing of nut jobs by both party’s does not mean they are “nutty” about the same things. My guess is were Gore president on 9/11 we wouldn’t be hearing anything from the loony Left about bombs planted in the WTC.
BFL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.