Skip to comments.
Mark Levin slams House Republicans for voting to eliminate Senate confirmation
The Right Scoop ^
| 7/31/2012
| Mark Levin
Posted on 07/31/2012 8:25:49 PM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Postman
I like that and it can be made into a great bumper sticker for each Rhino!
21
posted on
07/31/2012 9:40:13 PM PDT
by
sheikdetailfeather
(Yuri Bezmenov (KGB Defector) - "Kick The Communists Out of Your Govt. & Don't Accept Their Goodies.")
To: sheikdetailfeather
I will just keep saying this right til election day. If Romney is elected, Conservatism DIES. It will end.
To: sheikdetailfeather
Boehner should be tarred and feathered.
23
posted on
07/31/2012 9:42:57 PM PDT
by
ZULU
(See: http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&hd)
To: sheikdetailfeather
If a position doesn’t require Senate confirmation, it should be eliminated. It’s obviously unimportant and therefore probably unnecessary.
To: Jim Robinson
I’m going to organize a stink about this. They can’t afford to do what Romney tells them to do. They have to do what is right by their voters. Romney is an idiot and he’ll bring them all down with him.
To: SaraJohnson
And just who confirmed all of Obama’s czars? He has sidestepped the confirmation process already!!!
When Bush was president the Democrats used the confirmation process to block many good appointments. The press played it as objective Democrats and party-line Republicans. We can’t win.
My understanding is that this process is not for the Constitutional nominees to courts, etc.. That would require a constitutional amendment.
If this process is in effect when Romney is president, it will allow less obstruction by the Democrats. Now, how is that a bad thing?
26
posted on
07/31/2012 10:39:59 PM PDT
by
Loud Mime
(Defeat Obama. Everything else is secondary)
To: sheikdetailfeather
...and I assume they got nothing in return.
27
posted on
07/31/2012 11:25:21 PM PDT
by
Tex-Con-Man
(T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
To: sheikdetailfeather
This does not surprise me one bit. All these ABOs telling us how they are going to keep Romney on the straight and narrow if he’s elected. Well, he hasn’t even been elected yet and he’s already controlling these republicans in order to make it easier on the democrats. Conservatives get the shaft and the knives in the back. Socialist democrats get the outstretched hand and the reach across the aisle.
Thanks, Mitt./s
28
posted on
08/01/2012 1:15:47 AM PDT
by
Waryone
To: Flightdeck
Congress could use a little less red tape and more time available to focus on digging us out of this ditch.Congress helped dig the ditch. They need to spend more time acting as a check and balance on executive branch power and less time spending money we don't have.
29
posted on
08/01/2012 2:56:39 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
To: Dick Bachert
I bet you are right. If Romney wins in November.......it really isn’t a “win”. It’s just a stop gap measure to prevent the accelerated bleeding of our nation and even then it may not be enough. We’ll have to double down and continue to fight against RINOism.
30
posted on
08/01/2012 3:38:05 AM PDT
by
MachIV
To: Fledermaus
I too want ABO, but Im not sure I want Romneys knife in my back.See the tag line.
31
posted on
08/01/2012 4:33:40 AM PDT
by
NurdlyPeon
(It's down to 'anybody but Obama'. And God forgive me for what I must do in November.))
To: Jim Robinson
They dont call them the stupid party for nothing.
They're fast passing stupid and approaching traitorous territory.
32
posted on
08/01/2012 6:45:16 AM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
To: Jim Robinson
Jim: should Leftist "B" (Mittens) triumph over Leftist "A" Nobama), come November: can you please proactively prohibit any/all daily "Prayers for President Romney" threads, here on FR?
Seriously. Some things simply shouldn't be borne on a conservative site.
33
posted on
08/01/2012 7:08:18 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
To: MachIV
Given Romney’s — ahhh — “fluid” ideology (the old WetFingerInTheWind Technique) this guy should be fairly easy for sufficient public pressure to steer back onto the reservation when — not IF — but when he strays.
That option doesn’t work with the firmly radical and America hating ideological Marxist now infesting the WH.
So, from that perspective, we have gained some ground — and some time — to continue educating our ignorant neighbors for future cycles. If we halt or fail in that ongoing process, worse than Obozo awaits us down the road.
To: sheikdetailfeather
Mark Levin was livid when he read that House Republicans had voted to eliminate the Senate confirmation process for the reported number of 169 presidential appointments. And the explanation he got from a couple of sources was that Romney had told Republicans to vote for it, so they did. Levin wonders if we are already going back to the days of George W. Bush when House and Senate members voted a certain way to support the president instead of the Constitution. Just another reason why I can't vote for Romney.
35
posted on
08/01/2012 9:54:07 AM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2898271/posts?page=119#119)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Jim Robinson
Jim: should Leftist "B" (Mittens) triumph over Leftist "A" Nobama), come November: can you please proactively prohibit any/all daily "Prayers for President Romney" threads, here on FR? Seriously. Some things simply shouldn't be borne on a conservative site. I disagree, but it's Jim's call.
"But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you..."
-- Matthew 5:34 Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse them.
-- Romans 12:14
36
posted on
08/01/2012 10:00:21 AM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2898271/posts?page=119#119)
To: Alex Murphy; Jim Robinson
and pray for those who persecute you..."Start a daily "Prayers for Nancy Pelosi" or "Prayers for Rachel Maddow" thread, and I'll take the point seriously. ;)
37
posted on
08/01/2012 10:12:39 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson