Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawyers Have Already Drafted 13,000 Pages of Regulations for New ObamaTax Law
thegatewaypundit.com ^ | July 5, 2012 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 07/05/2012 8:36:46 AM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: grundle

Why isn’t the House finding out who’s paying for these lawyers that are drafting and pull the funding for them?


21 posted on 07/05/2012 9:12:39 AM PDT by Flint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

22 posted on 07/05/2012 9:15:42 AM PDT by shove_it (just undo it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
“There’s already 13,000 pages of regulations, and they’re not even done yet,” Rehberg said.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The register Code of Federal Regulations hit a record 163,000 pages in 2009 and the number of pending regulations costing more than $100 million has more than doubled according to Heritage.

To no one’s surprise environmental regulations seem to be the “main cost drivers in determining the severity of the disproportionate impact on small firms,” says the SBA, with tax compliance coming in number two. “Compliance with environmental regulations costs 364 percent more in small firms than in large firms. The cost of tax compliance is 206 percent higher in small firms than the cost in large firms.”

The Last Socialist in America

23 posted on 07/05/2012 9:21:59 AM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Indeed, there will be politically based punishment,
but their driving motivation is to criminalize Christian beliefs through an all-powerful State, ie, they’re building the kingdom of the anti-Christ.


24 posted on 07/05/2012 9:23:32 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Flint
"Why isn’t the House finding out who’s paying for these lawyers that are drafting and pull the funding for them?"

The House could make life very difficult by not funding select portions of agencies and specific functions, but the GOP, lead by the Weeper of the House, lacks a necessary ingredient - a backbone (or Boehner and many others are actually quite comfortable being collaborators).

25 posted on 07/05/2012 9:25:51 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grundle

And they said Obama didn’t create new jobs.

He’s also doing massive hiring for the IRS.


26 posted on 07/05/2012 9:32:05 AM PDT by altura (Vote Romney. He's our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Told you they were going to add to it.


27 posted on 07/05/2012 9:32:58 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

HHS will write this stuff? DOUBTFUL. The same organizations that wrote 0bamacare will write these new regs; GEORGE SOROS’ SOCIALIST THINK-TANKS such as ‘Center For American Progress’, etc.


28 posted on 07/05/2012 9:34:56 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

[ Indeed, there will be politically based punishment,
but their driving motivation is to criminalize Christian beliefs through an all-powerful State, ie, they’re building the kingdom of the anti-Christ. ]

Well if that happens I may have to leave the country.

But not before giving a good fight.


29 posted on 07/05/2012 9:40:37 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Charles Dickens couldn’t have written this bureaucratic national nightmare any better.


30 posted on 07/05/2012 9:46:22 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

...when you “moderates” were sitting on your worthless asses being the smartest people in the room - is this what you wanted?

If I were lib I’d be laughing and flipping everyone the bird too. Supposedly they’re the minority but they’re dragging us around by the jimmy and no one is lifting a single finger to even try to stop them.

Maybe we weren’t meant to be free. :(


31 posted on 07/05/2012 9:51:07 AM PDT by Tzimisce (THIS SUCKS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
I just received an email stating that on January 1, 2013 there will be a 3.8% real estate tax an any home sold. Not sure if this true or not. Thank you Obamacare.
32 posted on 07/05/2012 9:51:20 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Why codify any of it? It’s not like there’s a check on power, anyway. The gov’t can just make it up as they go. Seriously, go green, save a bunch of trees, and use Internet polls to determine if patient A is hot enough to get that liver transplant.


33 posted on 07/05/2012 9:51:25 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

SS all ready to hit the eletronic debit buttons, and hit the ground.


34 posted on 07/05/2012 10:00:00 AM PDT by Varsity Flight (Phony-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

There are limits where this applies that most taxpayers wont reach. Unless you do really well on your home sale and have a high annual income of > $200,000. Only then will you pay 3.8% tax on the capital gain. (Your profit on the house)

Not many people have capital gains on their house anymore. The 3.8% applies to rents and other income from some investments if you have a annual income > $200,000.


35 posted on 07/05/2012 10:01:14 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Listen to this speech Ronald Reagan made back in 1961. Heck, I think he was still a democrat at this point.

It is stunning! Reagan mentions creeping socialism labeled liberalism and lays out the case that the socialist would attempt to take over using health care among other areas.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRdLpem-AAs

36 posted on 07/05/2012 10:01:49 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

“Internet polls to determine if patient A is hot enough to get that liver transplant.”

Or green enough, Union member or not, votes the right way, tithes to Obama and the DNC....


37 posted on 07/05/2012 10:03:51 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grundle

BOHICA!


38 posted on 07/05/2012 10:06:49 AM PDT by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Come January, could President Romney issue an executive order abolishing these thousands of laws on Obamacare ?


39 posted on 07/05/2012 10:14:20 AM PDT by Ex-Democrat Dean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

The best days of healthcare in our nation are now passed.

We will never recover from the damage of this bill


40 posted on 07/05/2012 10:29:08 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (Future generations will curse what we've done to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson