[Olog-hai]

Fair warning: The European Union has “sustainable development” written into its constitution (in the form of the Treaty of Lisbon currently: people should read that document who have not yet done so). Do not call for this empire run by fanatics to develop its own defense.

[Timber Rattler]

So I guess they want to start lining up people and transporting them to death camps, beginning with Conservatives.

[wastedyears]

And that’s what it’s about. Extinguishing most of our race.

[LRS]

...the world's leading scientific academies ...

If that doesn't produce awe in each and everyone of you!!!

[PoloSec]

So all the wars, all the disease, all the famine in the world is not doing enough to cull the world population.

Maybe world leaders can do more to encourage serial killers, set all murders free, hate your neighbor as you hate yourself, and save the earth.

The wisdom of man is foolishness with God.

[samtheman]

"We are living beyond the planet's means. That's scientifically proven," said Gisbet Glaser of the International Council for Science...

Yes, just as its been scientifically proven every year since 1798, when Malthus wrote the first Population Doomsday prediction.

[SF_Redux]

illuminanti and cabals have had a plan they have followed for over 1000 years, and the have (up until now) been planning to see it through like all their others have been done

they have been planning through wars and nuclear radiation to eliminate the earth population down to only about 500 million to protect resources for their blood lines to continue supreme

[LibLieSlayer]

As soon as every one of these grant whore satanists kill themselves and every member of their extended families... I will pay closer attention. If you leftist faux science communists are serious... kill yourselves immediately.

LLS

[samtheman]

"Basically, you can't save the environment without reproductive health policies and programmes."

The current Global Abortion Holocaust isn't big enough for these "people" and they dream of expanding it a thousand-fold.

[nathanbedford]

Every American conservative who believes that the right to possess and dispose of property is inseparable from liberty should think twice before voicing visceral negative reaction to attempts at reduction of population.

It is the left that is flooding America with population increase while at the same time chipping away our right to dispose of our own property. It is no good to have a title deed which vests only nominal ownership in your real estate if you cannot build on it, farm it as you think best, devote it to its highest and best use. The property is no good to you if you are subject to a bureaucrats forbidding you to use your property because it contains a puddle or a species of lizard.

On the other hand, your property equally may not be of any use to you if your neighbor pollutes upstream water with his chicken packing plant or emits noxious and poisonous gases. Our ideas concerning liberty and our ideas concerning a man's right to dispose of his property as he sees fit were formulated in an agrarian age when the country was blessed with a limitless frontier and all one need do to get more land free of problems with neighbors was to go into the wilderness.

The population of America has doubled in my lifetime.

It will no doubt redouble my children's lifetime.

If you think you can maintain conservative values in the teeth of runaway population growth you are naïve. It is not by accident that the left is flooding our country with poor people who make demands on politicians who are only too eager to satisfy them out of your pocketbook, your lifestyle, and your property.

The consequences of packing too many people into too small a space can be seen in China. They can be seen in India. Policymakers cite sheer population pressure as the reason to steal your liberty. Sometimes, as in the example of the chicken packing plant in Arkansas, they would be right to do so, had Bill Clinton not been bought. In other instances, such as in China, they are wrong to do so by forced abortions, in effect a hideous holocaust.

Conservatives should not argue in a losing battle about the method used by politicians to address the very real problems generated by overpopulation, we should strike at the cause rather than at the symptom.

By way of stipulations: I do not concede that Hobbes was right and that we cannot feed a substantial population on the earth. On the other hand, I do not accept that the only way to perpetuate the Ponzi scheme called Social Security is by inducing wholesale immigration. Finally, I share the suspicions of everyone on this board concerning motives of the people in Rio. If I am suspicious about their motives, I am absolutely paranoid about their methods.

[Morpheus2009]

The European Union has “sustainable development” written into its constitution (in the form of the Treaty of Lisbon currently: people should read that document who have not yet done so). Do not call for this empire run by fanatics to develop its own defense.

Yep, let’s summarize what Europe has done to bring on it’s own decline: Value wealth in $$$$$ over wealth in actually having offspring, thereby both aborting and/or simply infertilizing themselves into a downward spiral that will only keep increasing in the rate of decrease as you have fewer women capable of childbearing each successive generation. Then there’s the far out driving motive of sexual pleasure above actually performing it for all it’s purposes, including the potential for reproduction, hence why you tend to see loads of portrayals of sexuality, but a fertility rate below replacement levels, and then there’s the whole issue of deficit, yes, most of the EU runs on some deluded deficit that is driving the inflation, and is likely to eventually bring down the Euro as an official currency in most of the EU, as the truth starts becoming beyond denial, the list of nations which are being considered for being dropped from the EU keeps declining.

Now getting to the environmental part, recycling is good, throwing away one’s trash in the proper receptacle is good, organizing standards for emitted substance that do compromise individual health if directly inhaled or swallowed from water is important, and there has been a great deal of progress killing most of the important dangerous pollutants in air and water (lead, Ozone, VOCs, SO2, NO, NO2, PM (2.5, 5, &10), and CO, but the issue of national sovereignty does not need to be thrown out, nor does the right of an individual human to perform at least a little combustion need to be thrown out either, or have kids, as the system in the developed world still goes in the direction of break even population growth and ultimately decline, despite the existence of families with over two kids and families like the duggars with who knows how many, the overall trend even in the Americas is decline regardless, and this is without some one or two child only laws to force it.

[Morpheus2009]

The European Union has “sustainable development” written into its constitution (in the form of the Treaty of Lisbon currently: people should read that document who have not yet done so). Do not call for this empire run by fanatics to develop its own defense.

Yep, let’s summarize what Europe has done to bring on it’s own decline: Value wealth in $$$$$ over wealth in actually having offspring, thereby both aborting and/or simply infertilizing themselves into a downward spiral that will only keep increasing in the rate of decrease as you have fewer women capable of childbearing each successive generation. Then there’s the far out driving motive of sexual pleasure above actually performing it for all it’s purposes, including the potential for reproduction, hence why you tend to see loads of portrayals of sexuality, but a fertility rate below replacement levels, and then there’s the whole issue of deficit, yes, most of the EU runs on some deluded deficit that is driving the inflation, and is likely to eventually bring down the Euro as an official currency in most of the EU, as the truth starts becoming beyond denial, the list of nations which are being considered for being dropped from the EU keeps declining.

Now getting to the environmental part, recycling is good, throwing away one’s trash in the proper receptacle is good, organizing standards for emitted substance that do compromise individual health if directly inhaled or swallowed from water is important, and there has been a great deal of progress killing most of the important dangerous pollutants in air and water (lead, Ozone, VOCs, SO2, NO, NO2, PM (2.5, 5, &10), and CO, but the issue of national sovereignty does not need to be thrown out, nor does the right of an individual human to perform at least a little combustion need to be thrown out either, or have kids, as the system in the developed world still goes in the direction of break even population growth and ultimately decline, despite the existence of families with over two kids and families like the duggars with who knows how many, the overall trend even in the Americas is decline regardless, and this is without some one or two child only laws to force it.

[Soul of the South]

Most of the developed nations are experiencing declines in birth rates to below replacement levels. The United States is the exception due to it allowing high rates of legal and illegal immigration. One might conclude the developed nations are not the population threat.

The underdeveloped nations are the problem. We have provided them with medical care and sanitation practices that permit dramatic increases in lifespan but, unlike developed nations, their populations are sustaining high birth rates. If overpopulation is a legitimate concern, the left should consider pulling all foreign aid (food and medical) from underdeveloped countries. The result will be an increase in death rates from disease and starvation, resulting in the lower population levels desired by the left. Without the external infusion of resources from developed countries nature will ensure the population drops to the level the resources of the nation can support.

Unfortunately for those who are middle age and older living in developing countries the real agenda of the left is to reduce populations in developed countries through denial of medical care and compulsory euthanasia for the “unproductive” older citizens of developed countries. An added benefit for the progressives of such a policy is ability to redistribute the wealth left behind by the deceased to the deserving masses in underdeveloped nations.

The drumbeat to soften up our children to accept death panels and euthanasia for the aged is beginning. Obamacare puts in place the mechanisms to accomplish the result once society is conditioned to accept the behavior in the same way it has been conditioned to accept the loosening of marriage vows, homosexuality, on demand abortion, politically correct speech and thought, large populations of low skill undocumented residents, government intrusion in every facet of life, the absence of personal accountably, and lower standards of performance in academics and the workplace. Within 10-15 years, it will be accepted that beyond a certain age, say 70 or 75 all but the elites have the obligation to submit to euthanasia in order to free up resources for the next generation. Of course the ruling class elites will not be expected to submit to this requirement because of their special contributions to society.

[theBuckwheat]

A person who understood free market economics would know that there is NO SUCH THING as a shortage of resources over time. There is ONLY a price that is too high for the planned use. High prices prompt adaption, innovation, and substitution. The views expressed in this article are ZERO-SUM NONSENSE.

I would note that Europe official REJECTS the free market. The Treaty of Lisbon specifies that Europe has a “social market economy” instead, which is a form of socialism/fascism.

[Redleg Duke]

Okay. Let’s start by eliminating all members of Islam.

[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

[Iron Munro]

1 - Stop promoting, supporting and enabling the Islamic diaspora.

2 - Stop enabling the over-population of Africa and allow the population to come into balance with its ability to produce food. Flying in grains and consuming the last wild animal herds is not a sustainable long term plan.

[exit82]

The scientists should lead by example.

[NormsRevenge]

ZPG .. zero population growth and culling.. Their true agenda.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

Thanks for posting this.