Liquid Light licensed its technology from Princeton. Cole leads a team of chemists who tackle the practical issue of how to scale up a laboratory invention to an industrial scale, while Bocarsly chairs the company's scientific advisory board. Credit: Denise Applewhite
This photoelectrochemical cell contains a solution of carbon dioxide and pyridinium as a catalyst dissolved in water. A low-power blue light-emitting diode (LED) provides light, which activates the semiconductor, causing the conversion of the CO2 and water to methanol and oxygen with the help of the pyridine catalyst. This cell is highly efficient, with greater than 95 percent of the electrons generated by the illumination going into the formation of methanol. Credit: Andrew Bocarsly
Ping!..........
Ping!........
Pretty cool.
Doing technically at great effort and expense what God’s green trees and plants do now? (Well, almost.)
Great idea. His weak point is that we already have an almost limitless supply of fuel, and it’s just sitting there in the ground waiting to be harvested.
Very interesting.
I would love to know the longevity of the electrodes and catalyst along with their cost.
Even at somewhat low efficiencies, the ability to create a combustible gas from an intermittent source such as wind or solar and a plentiful byproduct would allow for that energy to be consumed and made productive when needed.
This is no silver bullet but we do not need a silver bullet just many bullets of all types for a variety of needs.
What we need is more coal fired electrical power to drive the blue LEDs that convert CO2 to hydrocarbons!!
I am mentally imagining
a strange rube goldberg type device
installed at a factory
with windmill blades mounted over the smokestack
that spin from the heat rising from the stack
that send electrical power to the electrodes
that convert the CO2 in the stack emissions
into fuel that runs the factory
but, what do we do when we run out of CO2? We will be right back where we started from and the we will be required to use fossil fuels so as to supply the green energy jobs at the CO2 convering industry.
Let’s see, based on projected increases, we have in excess of 500 years of known reserves for natural gas;m more than 500 years of coal; more known reserves of oil than anyone else on the planet and finding more all of the time, and virtually untapped nuclear power (except in the Navy).
Only one aspect of this really intrigues me. That’s the idea that maybe something can come along to take the wind out of the carbon dioxide Nazi’s sails. That would be a beautiful thing.
Thanks for the interesting post Red Badger but looking at some of the replies it would seem we have some of the same mentality we decry from the left.
There is no perfect energy source for every application. A country like the USA needs every possible source imaginable as our energy requirements are so diverse.
What works good in a car may not work in the center of an explosives factory or what works to heat domestic hot water may not work in an airplane. So what? Give us as many possible sources of energy and the market place will figure out the winners for each application and there might be multiple winners for a single application.
I am disappointed so many shots taken at this and numerous other ideas by fellow Freepers. I almost had to look at the URL to make sure I had not been hijacked to the DU.
Why not just use the fossil fuels that come naturally out of the ground// This is silly.