Meaning that nearly one in five children of same-sex couples has been sexually abused.
If you presented this huge discrepancy to your avg lib, they wouldn’t believe it, it’s a tenet of their religion that there is absolutely nothing wrong with being homosexual.
Well, duh...
Bookmark for later.
To a narcissist, a child is just a kind of hood ornament.
Keep an eye on this....there will be a major effort to shut this guy up. Don’t be surprised if he retracts this study and apologizes....
</MATHTEACHER>
In other news, study finds two arms more advantageous than one...
What would a NAMBLA “married couple” do to an adopted little boy? DUH!
what is the common denominator of that 23% of predators?
where is the MSM? nearly 1/4 of a group of children are being targeted and the MSM is deafeningly silent.
Of course, this will do nothing to hamper the ability of gay couples to adopt kids.
“Less than 2 percent of children from intact, biological families reported experiencing sexual abuse of some nature, but that figure for children of same-sex couples is 23 percent.”
LIES!!! All LIES!!! The APA has determined that Gay is great and normal and beneficial to society! These people must be stripped of their jobs and their reputations destroyed immediately!
Our leader does not endorse this trash. He has honored the homo community properly! How dare these people let fact and reality interfere with the cause? We cannot let this spread. People will get ideas and think that gays shouldn’t have access to kids. Imagine! Worse, they might think for a change and realize that the homos are just recruiting from birth!
LIES I TELL YOU!!! LIES!!!
/s
Yep, lots of sexual abuse; but, hey, let’s just continue to allow these people to adopt. Progressive social experimentation is always bad for children, this is just the newest form.
Disadvantaged! That’s great news! Now we know that we’ll need lots of government programs to address this “disadvantage.”
See how easy it is! The left always wins!
If same sex alternative lifestyle relationships are considered to be the actions of consenting adults in private, when do the CHILDREN consent to being brought into an alternative lifestyle home?
And what is the percentage preference of boy children over girl children among two-mens couples?
I would weigh in here, but I’m a homophobe, so my opinion doesn’t matter on this subject.
I think we are missing the boat on how to fight the homosexual agenda. We tend to argue morality with people who have no fear of God. Chuck Coleson recommended using purely secular arguments when confronting the Godless.
Instead, we should treat homosexuality the same way we treat smoking. It harms the physical and mental health of those involved in this behavior, and yes, like secondary smoking, it harms those non-practicing family members who are repeatedly exposed to the lifestyle. Homosexuality leads to a shortened life span, increased STDs, and increased depression and suicide.
Yes, there are other moral and social issues, but that alone should be enough for our local secular school boards and politicians.
23% is over 1 in 5 and nearly 1 in 4.
Paging Natural Law, modernity is calling.
This report is more ammunition against the tidal wave of homosexual marriage.
People could care less if someone has a religious conviction against homosexuality. Conservatives need to package their opposition to homosexual marriage based on one thing: its damage to children. Children deserve to be raised by a mother AND a father.