[Behind Liberal Lines]

Less than 2 percent of children from intact, biological families reported experiencing sexual abuse of some nature, but that figure for children of same-sex couples is 23 percent.

Meaning that nearly one in five children of same-sex couples has been sexually abused.

[nonsporting]

Less than 2 percent of children from intact, biological families reported experiencing sexual abuse of some nature, but that figure for children of same-sex couples is 23 percent.

How can this be surprising? These so-called "same sex couples" are in reality sick, perverted sodomites. Of course, they are going to abuse children in the pursuit of their pederatistic perversion. Their goal is children.

At least one of the party is going to be genetically unrelated, possibly both via adoption. This is an ideal environment for sexual exploitation. I think 23% is unnaturally low.

[Gabrial]

A while back two lesbians starved and beat their male child to death with electrical cords while their female children were well cared for.

http://www.armyofmom.com/2006/06/how-is-this-possible.html

Press was almost silent.

[Paradox]

Reading the entire article, it is very balanced actually. It indicates that the major problem with same sex child rearing is that it probably entails more instability than a heterosexual family. The author actually says that the study is not an indictment of gay parents. Interesting, but clearly it blows away previous studies that show no effect or a net positive for the child.

[DeltaZulu]

No, it means that nearly one in FOUR children of same-sex couples has/is abused. 23% is closer to 25 than 20. And when you consider unreported cases ...

[92nina]

It looks like NRO pulled the article.

It's still linked on the NRO home page but the link is a 404.