Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich Calls for Universal Right to Bear Arms at NRA Forum
The Daily Beast ^ | Apr 13, 2012 7:05 | Michael Ames

Posted on 04/18/2012 8:53:32 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

If the Republican presidential nomination were decided by the volume and energy of applause from thousands of National Rifle Association members gathered today in St. Louis, Newt Gingrich might yet have a shot at greatness.

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks at the National Rifle Association convention in St. Louis, Friday, April 13, 2012., Michael Conroy / AP Photo

Friday’s Celebration of American Values Leadership forum featured speeches by Mitt Romney, recent contender Rick Santorum, plus conservative stars like former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. But members of the influential gun lobby today reserved their greatest enthusiasms not for their presumptive nominee Romney, but for Newt Gingrich, a candidate who perseveres to the wonderment of many and the joy of some.

Romney spoke before Gingrich and focused mainly on general-election themes and descriptions of President Obama’s governing philosophies. “Our founders created a system of government that is limited. Barack Obama is leading us away from that vision,” Romney said. “President Obama is leading toward a government of limited freedom and limited opportunity.”

The stump speech painted the election in broad brush strokes, contrasting the bright hope of freedom, a word Romney used nearly two-dozen times,

against the dark threats of a massive, sun-blocking bureaucracy that he said flourishes under Obama.

Romney cannot claim a life of gun enthusiasm. The director of the NRA’s lobbying branch, Chris Cox, introduced the former Massachusetts governor

as a “life member of the NRA,” but Romney signed up for his lifetime membership just six years ago, when he first explored running for president as a Republican.

Nor can the NRA claim a long courtship of Romney. In 2002, the lobby did not endorse his run for governor, despite his Meet the Press claim to the contrary. In that race, the NRA gave Romney a B grade, but gave his Democratic opponent, Shannon O’Brien, a sterling A.

Today in St. Louis, Romney repeated his support for Second Amendment rights as elemental, and he focused on the power of the judiciary to protect that right. Romney warned that a second Obama term would “remake” the Supreme Court and imperil the future of gun rights. “Our freedoms,” he said, would be in hands of an Obama court “not just for four years, but for 40,” he said.

The crowd was appreciative of the man who will likely court their votes this fall, but the NRA faithful became far more animated for Gingrich. With his characteristic flourish for sweeping and historical ideas, the former House speaker laid out a guideline for an international gun-rights movement that the NRA’s Cox called “the Gingrich Doctrine.”

“We don’t need to go across the planet trying to impose American values, but we do need to go across the planet spreading human values,” Gingrich said. “The Second Amendment is a right for all mankind.”

“The right to bear arms comes from our creator, not our government,” Gingrich said. The NRA “has been too timid” in promoting its agenda beyond American borders. The Bill of Rights was not written only for Americans, he said. “It is a universal document.”

“A Gingrich presidency will submit to the UN a treaty that extends the right to bear arms as a human right to every person on the planet.” Every world citizen, he said, “deserves the right to defend themselves from those who exploit, imprison, or kill them.” For his latest big idea, Gingrich earned a standing ovation from the crowd of roughly 5,000.

“We don’t need to go across the planet trying to impose American values, but we do need to go across the planet spreading human values,” Gingrich said. “The Second Amendment is a right for all mankind.”

Many establishment Republicans have openly called for Gingrich to give up his quest. His refusal to submit has been described as egomaniacal and destructive. But in St. Louis on Friday, the man who handily won the South Carolina primary but whose campaign is running on financial fumes, seemed as confident as ever.

“This is still a more open nomination process than anyone in the elite media believes,” Gingrich said.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: newt; romney
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792

1 posted on 04/18/2012 8:53:43 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Nor can the NRA claim a long courtship of Romney. In 2002, the lobby did not endorse his run for governor, despite his Meet the Press claim to the contrary. In that race, the NRA gave Romney a B grade, but gave his Democratic opponent, Shannon O’Brien, a sterling A.

Another day, and another Mitt Romney lie exposed.

And another issue where he is found lacking, while the only conservative left in the race, Newt Gingrich, stands head and shoulders on this issue above that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney.



2 posted on 04/18/2012 8:56:01 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Newt Gingrich, stands head and shoulders on this issue above that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney.

True, but only because Mittens is so totally worthless in supporting 2nd amend rights. If you go by what they DID rather than what they say, then they're both garbage. EXAMPLE Neut voted for the Hughs amendment to ban machine guns in 1986. Mittens banned semiautos as gov

3 posted on 04/18/2012 9:08:07 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: bearinthewoods


Hey Mr. head-in-the-sand,

There are 46% of the delegates still to be won during the GOP Primaries, this is not even close to being done.

And this isn't just about 2nd Amendment rights, this is about Abortion, the Gay Agenda, Global Warming, trustworthiness, Cap-and-Trade, RomneyCare, etc., etc., etc.

Here is how your boy, that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal compares to Obama and Newt.

Notice anything that is eye-poppingly clear?

Let me help your slow comprehension skills, Obama and Mitt are almost identical, Newt is not.


5 posted on 04/18/2012 9:41:39 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Everyone should watch Newt's whole speech to the NRA. It was mostly an energy policy speech. He goes into way more specifics than Obama does with his solar, wind and algae.

On the God given right to bear arms, Newt was great (with a little history lesson). I don't quite get his UN angle thought. Maybe I am too busy keep my head above water and trying to raise two kids. I just don't give two craps about gun rights in other countries, particularly if they are Muslim nations. Let them kill each other off, they are worthless and evil anyways. I'd rather abolish the UN and deal with legitimate states individually. And for the rest of the world, just don't get in the US of A's way. We can't afford to rebuild nations, but we do have to deplete our weapons inventory before they go stale.

6 posted on 04/18/2012 10:43:37 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson