Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good idea Freepers? I think so, they should have teemed up long ago (would have made stopping Romney even easier). One should be President, and one should be V.P. and I really don't care which one, either would be better than Obama and much better than Romney.
1 posted on 04/01/2012 8:58:00 PM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JSDude1

We’re screwed.


2 posted on 04/01/2012 9:08:50 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Is Romney a republican traitor?..


5 posted on 04/01/2012 9:14:53 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

That would be interesting. But a lot of Newt-backing Freepers burned that bridge a long time ago.


6 posted on 04/01/2012 9:17:19 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Never understood the hatred between the two camp’s supporters. I like them both for different reasons but they are both Conservatives.

Pray for America


8 posted on 04/01/2012 9:18:58 PM PDT by bray (Power to We the People)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Great.

This election completely sucks.


10 posted on 04/01/2012 9:28:48 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

I wouldn’t mind seeing Newt as VP at all. I think he’d do a good job. However, the issue I have is that I don’t think whoever the nominee is, whether it be Romney, Santorum, or Gingrich, I don’t think one of them should pick one of the other for VP. There have been too many negative attacks all around. If Romney were to pick Santorum, for example, the Dems would pull out his attack ads and comments and ask why he picked someone for VP he once criticized heavily and vice versa. I think that could complicate things, and I think we’d be better off if whoever the nominee is goes outside of the crop of remaining candidates and picks a fresh face.


12 posted on 04/01/2012 9:34:57 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Rick Santorum For President (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N89LGhm-Ztc))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
....there is a "possibility of consolidating Santorum and Gingrich delegates at the Republican National Convention in order to overcome Romney’s delegate math."

AT THE CONVENTION MY A**. This needs to be done NOW....we have no assurance Romney won't get the 1,144 Delegates before the Convention. People are already growing weary and throwing in the towel for RINO-Rom. A Gingrich/Santorum coalition could revive the possibility of "stopping Romney" from reaching the magic number of 1,144. They need to combine forces NOW.....RIGHT NOW!!!
13 posted on 04/01/2012 9:36:02 PM PDT by no dems (I've always been crazy but that's the only thing that's kept me from going insane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
Newt Gingrich should be the nominee; not the liberal

democrat Romney. Romney is worse than McCain. There is no

place for conservatives (the insiders seen to that)

14 posted on 04/01/2012 9:36:27 PM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
I've been saying that since the first debate.

Gingrich-Santorum
 
or
 
Santorum-Gingrich

21 posted on 04/01/2012 9:46:39 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Too little, too late.


22 posted on 04/01/2012 9:46:50 PM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Liberals vote the way they feel, conservatives vote the way they think. NRA <BCC><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

According to reports on Fox Sunday, Romney is crashing. He now loses in one-on-one polls against Obama in FL, OH, and PA (?). His unfavorable rating is about 50%. He would lose to Obama if election was today. He is behind Obama in two new polls by double digits. AND THIS WAS ON FOX NEWS! HANG TOUGH NEWT!


26 posted on 04/01/2012 9:51:26 PM PDT by matthew fuller (FLASH! Republican circular firing squad successful! No survivors remain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1; onyx; Jim Robinson; Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ping to onyx, Jim,and Ernest:
Just in case this one slides by you all. Of course if there is truth in it, we shall see a flood of like articles produced in the days, weeks to come. No response required.
Thanks for the post JSD.
29 posted on 04/01/2012 9:55:36 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Newt - Santorum... If it must be, I could live with that.

Santorum - Newt... No thanks.


43 posted on 04/01/2012 10:57:08 PM PDT by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

Doesn’t float my boat.


53 posted on 04/02/2012 2:24:20 AM PDT by GVnana (Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1
[Talk of Shared Ticket to Stop Romney]

This headline is bogus. It is only something the writer of this opinion added in. There is not talk of a shared ticket. Only that Newt has announced that he will support whom ever is the nominee. Newt just reaffirmed this claim on Meet the Press and FOX News.

I will also predict, that after tomorrow, and the kind of win that Romney will have, is going to force Newt to make that choice sooner. It will make Newt's effort impossible, and Santorum's as good as impossible. Newt's Super PAC supporter will also move over to Romney shortly after.

Newt will support Romney. He is not that stupid to believe that Santorum has a Snow Ball's chance in Hell of beating Obama. Even with him as the VP. After all, Newt loves his country above all else and will do what is best for it.

60 posted on 04/02/2012 9:33:18 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

I’ve been posting here since at least a week before the Illinois primary that one of them needed to drop out and start campaigning with the other one if they had any chance to defeat Romney. That is due to the winner-take-all rules in Illinois and many upcoming Romney-favorable states. Combining their votes would defeat Romney in some states and districts where Romney would otherwise win. It would also allow them to get over 50% in some states where Romney would already lose, which would shut Romney out of any delegates at all due to the 50% threshold rule.

The sum total of Rick and Newt could’ve been greater than its parts. The polls in this primary have often shown that people like aspects of each candidate, but also find flaws in all of them. They wish they could combine all the candidates into one. Newt and Rick could have pulled that off by joining forces. They would counterbalance each other’s flaws and look like a better ticket to many people up against Romney.

However, if Romney wins Wisconsin then it’s almost definitely too late now. This would have probably had to happen before Illinois where Romney also won big. There are too many Romney-favorable states coming up now which he is going to win no matter what.

Neither Newt nor most of his supporters realized quickly enough that winner-take-all rules make a huge difference and that Newt being on a Santorum ticket is better than both of them losing to Romney.


63 posted on 04/02/2012 10:15:40 AM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JSDude1

...............[WI campaign director Robert]”Lorge said that in conference calls with the national team there has been discussion about the possibility of consolidating Santorum and Gingrich delegates at the Republican National Convention in order to overcome Romney’s delegate math.

“I imagine there’s going to be a lot of negotiation and compromising between the pro-Newt Gingrich and the pro-Rick Santorum delegates,” he said. “You may have a Newt Gingrich-Rick Santorum ticket. You may have a Rick Santorum-Newt Gingrich ticket. Nobody knows how that ticket’s going to work out. But I imagine it’ll end up being something like that.”

Pointing to Gingrich’s accomplishments in the House, Lorge believes delegates will see that his candidate is the only one with the experience necessary to be the White House.

“America is a republic,” Lorge said. “We’re not a democracy. We don’t believe in mob rule. We hire people by electing them to represent us. We’re a representative democracy, that’s what we talk about. Our Founding Fathers were very wise in not having a straight, pure democracy. We have a republic for a reason so that wiser decisions, calm decisions can be made in the best interest of the nation as a whole and that is what Newt Gingrich is all about.”

The amount of chaos and strategy that would be involved in the open convention scenario is so mentally demanding that it’s hard to imagine any other candidate but Newt Gingrich believing it is possible. And perhaps the reckless challenge of it all is giving the candidate a new skip in his step.”......

http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/2012/03/30/gingrich-camp-talks-shared-ticket-santorum


65 posted on 04/02/2012 10:23:23 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson