Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing Looks Afar for New C-17 Jet Sales
The Wall Street Journal ^ | March 29, 2012, | DAVID KESMODEL & NATHAN HODGE

Posted on 03/29/2012 8:07:54 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Boeing Looks Afar for New C-17 Jet Sales

As U.S. Demand for Military-Cargo Plane Wanes, Aircraft Maker Hopes Mideast, Asian Buyers Will Fill the Gap

BA -0.34%Boeing Co., BA -0.34%racing to drum up sales of its C-17 to avoid shutting down production of the military-cargo plane, believes new orders may emerge in coming months from the Middle East or Asia, a senior executive said.

"Our hope is that future sales occur [in those regions] this year," Bob Ciesla, program manager for the C-17 Globemaster III, said in an interview this week.

Mr. Ciesla declined to discuss specific countries that may order the $200 million to $270 million plane, but a Boeing union official said one country showing interest is Saudi Arabia.

Boeing is pinning its hopes on emerging-market orders for the C-17 at a time when it and other U.S. military contractors are struggling to right-size their businesses in the face of steep Pentagon spending cuts. The C-17 is one of the long-running defense programs for Chicago-based Boeing, which gets about half of its revenue from its defense business.

The aircraft was developed in the 1980s by McDonnell Douglas Corp.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; airlift; boeing; c17

1 posted on 03/29/2012 8:08:05 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I live a mile or so away from one end of a military base. And I can tell without opening my eyes what is landing or taking off. F-18, F-16, B-52, C-5, Jap Zero (during the airshow), F-35... etc... Even without hearing call signs from the tower frequency.

I heard a weird one the other day and had to step out on the porch to see what it was.

C-17.

My first irrational thought was: "that C-5 needs to bulk up." ;)

Don't see 'em that often.

/johnny

2 posted on 03/29/2012 8:15:43 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

At the 50th Air Force anniversary at Nellis AFB, 1997, the C-17 display included a model with FedEx markings. ‘Seems like it would be a good plane for them.


3 posted on 03/29/2012 8:35:25 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Saw a C-17 demonstration at Wings Over Houston two years ago. Most amazing part was just how little runway was needed to land the plane.


4 posted on 03/29/2012 8:38:33 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

I know a pilot who flies the C-17, I sat in the pilot’s seat playing with the plane’s radio. I was listening to KDKA-AM as well as shortwave, would have loved to fire it up on 10 meters if I could (I’m an amateur radio operator).


5 posted on 03/29/2012 8:41:14 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Send Obama back to the ghetto, November 6th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
No kidding. Same with the C-5 and C-130. When I watch a short-field takeoff with any of those, my right arm twitches to push a yoke forward.

They are certainly high-lift AC.

/johnny

6 posted on 03/29/2012 8:42:24 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

BTW, it was at “Wings Over Pittsburgh.” Just tonight, I saw 4 C-5’s fly in, one after the other. Mom calls them, “The Screecher.” Scared my poor cats too. B-P


7 posted on 03/29/2012 8:42:59 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Send Obama back to the ghetto, November 6th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

It’s a really neat aircraft. I got a tour of one by a pilot buddy several years ago.


8 posted on 03/29/2012 8:51:07 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
In my book, anything that flies is a neat aircraft. Some just have better engineering than others.

But yes, the C-17, by it's longevity, has proved itself.

I don't think I've ever been on a C-17, and if I was, it wasn't on the flight-deck.

I wouldn't mind a tour of one, but I'm not going to fight the crowds at the airshow. ;)

/johnny

9 posted on 03/29/2012 8:56:17 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man
C-5s are loud. Even landing.

We had a BUFF shooting touch and goes the other day, and I recognized the engine sound, but it was much quieter than I remembered it. Either my hearing is more gone than it was last time it was tested, or they have improved engines, operations, or something. The B-52 was actually quieter on final than an F-18.

/johnny

10 posted on 03/29/2012 9:00:41 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I got to fly in one a couple of years ago. I sat in the cockpit on landing, then got to watch the pilot back it up into a tight spot (no room to turn around) using the thrust reversers.


11 posted on 03/29/2012 9:21:18 PM PDT by shorty_harris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson