??????
There was no statement about trespassing. He was walking home after visiting a relative. Even if he was walking through a “closed community”, shooting an unarmed person who is not committing a serious crime is an irresponsible action which threatens MY Second Amendment rights.
STOP DEFENDING ZIMMERMAN!!!
I didn’t defend Zimmerman; I want to know if the kid was trespassing.
As far as whether or not Zimmerman was justified, we’ll see; I don’t know enough about it either way.
STOP CONVICTING ZIMMERMAN!!!
Meh.
Here’s a towel for your drool.
Use it before you drown in it.
Lynch the bastard, eh?
May I say that unless you were there you are as ignorant of the facts as your pal, Al Sharpton.
I think most of us are not really "defending" Zimmerman--we're just saying, let's take a realistic look at what evidence we have. So far, the evidence (witnesses, tapes, police reports) does not fully support the media's stories.
At this point, the only things the media has gotten right is that one man is dead. The race of Zimmerman has been falsely reported as white, words on the 911 tapes have been mis-reported to paint Zimmerman as a racist white guy, and the media has carefully obscured many of the facts of the case that would seem to exonerate Zimmerman. This has to be some of the worst reporting I've ever seen.
In the US, it's usually customary to have the trial prior to the execution, not that this will stop the mob mentality we're witnessing. I think we're being set up for a summer of riots, and possibly for martial law so Obama can try out his nifty new EO.
And freepers are HELPING with this agenda? What ever happened to "let's investigate the facts before reaching conclusions?"
You lie! Martin DID attack Zimmerman! Stop lying!!!
(there. We can be drama queens, too.)