http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/ariz-officials-revisit-obamas-birth-certificate-15923061
The words debunked are used but at least the coverage is simmering.
“Despite all evidence to the contrary”. I LOVE these guys!
All we have is one lousy congressman willing to even talk about it and this is all he will say? Anyone with any sense knows it's a fake. But this proof that the issue is going nowhere. This congressman and the rest of Congress can be described as 'useless' and 'hopeless', respectively.
” - - - Stearns says he is awaiting the results of another independent investigation by Maricopa County [Ariz.] Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who claims he has proof the birth certificate is a “computer-generated forgery.”
Thanks for this update.
We've heard the unsubstantiated opinions of Obama supporters, nothing more.
I agree on both points.
Obama ia a pathetic, incompetent Marxist that has captured the imagination of the Democrats, the Liberal Agenda Media, and those who like good sounding speeches.
The result is a blithering idiot who has no objective supporters.
The key is to create doubt in the minds of his supporters.
I am in favor of a multi-pronged campaign on a variety of topics so defense eventually shows the weakness that can be pursued to maximum effect. (Similar to the way a pack of us Graewoulves weed out the weaklings in a herd).
Ping me if you would on this or other potential supporters of Arpaio’s pursuit of the truth.
Did the President of the United States and Harvard Law School graduate simply lose the original one, the one that his mother walked out with when she was discharged from Kapiolani Hospital a few days after supposedly giving birth to Obama in 1961?
Or, did the dog eat it?
Or, was it in such bad shape that Obama felt that he needed a new one?
If the original 1961 was in such bad condition, why not show that damaged copy to reporters at the April 27, 2011 press conference just before he showed the reporters the new copy?
If President Obama simply lost the birth certificate that he talks about in one of his books, then I wonder how long ago he lost it, because then Senator Obama ordered a short form certificate in June 2007.
Also, I'm wondering why President Obama ordered a short form in 2007 and then turned around 4 years later in April 2011 and ordered a long form birth certificate, because---I think it is safe to say---most people order a new birth certificate only when they lose the one they had.
That is, it looks to me like the President of the United States and Harvard Law School graduate, Obama, lost his Hawaii long form birth certificate before or during 2007, or else why would he find it necessary to order a less-detailed short form in June 2007 and a long, more-detailed form in April 2011?
I wonder if Obama is paying Joe a “special” visit sometime soon, after all he is out in the SW on a campaign trail.
So??.....ABC?....Where is this compelling evidence to the contrary? The forgeries? Internet images of newspaper baby announcements? Take that to the DMV and see how it gets you.
“I think Cliff Stearns does a good job with the chairmanship of his subcommittee,” Cantor told The Hill in the Capitol Wednesday. “He has my full confidence.”
Cantor was responding to a question about whether it's appropriate to have someone who has questioned Obama's birth certificate leading a probe of the White House.
If his concerns were real, he wouldn’t have to wait on Joe or anyone. That’s just an excuse.
B U M P
“despite all evidence to the contrary” There IS no evidence....only evidence of FRAUD!!!! LYING MSM POS!!
There is so much evidence that the president has lied about his birth and other aspects of his personal history, that to NOT be a birther would be wacko.
The huge question now is: What is causing most of the media, including conservative members, to not report or discuss these questions? Is something scaring them?
This is typical MSM Pravda-style journalism, obviously intended to paint Congressman Stearns as some kind of fool who is out of touch with reality. The truth of the matter is that there is no scientific evidence whatsoever that the BC image which appeared on the WH web site last April was a that of a scanned image of a bona fide document. Rather than Stearns or Sheriff Arpaio, it's these MSM hacks, like the anonymous author(s) of the posted story, who are the purveyors of disinformation on the subject.