Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I wonder why Rush's departing advertisers were unwilling to stand up for me and so many like me, but they stand up for the 30 year old with a $24,000 scholarship who complains about the cost of birth control while she attends a DC area(Catholic) school with plenty of taxpayer funded Planned Parenthood “clinics” around doling it out. Did she not meet their minimum income requirement?

Rather, I believe she is a shill planted by the Socialist Democrats who currently rule and ruin the lives of decent Americans. She apparently spends much more time on her back than sitting at a desk.

1 posted on 03/07/2012 4:41:35 AM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: IbJensen

Sandra Fluke took troubles to be provocative while at the same time attempting to exempt her own self from any accusation of sexual impropriety. Whatever the details, she managed to bait Rush into calling her a slut. If she was not a slut, then she put herself, in some sense, in the shoes of sluts in general. Subsidized sluttery is only one way in which conscience rights of employers (and medical personnel and just the plain old taxpayer) can be violated. It was a shame that the strumpet word “slut” and petty quibbling over who is one hogged the limelight away from conscience rights, whoever’s fault this might ultimately be, Fluke’s or Limbaugh’s or the liberals who leaned on the advertisers or the advertisers themselves.


2 posted on 03/07/2012 4:52:45 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Sometimes progressives find their scripture in the penumbra of sacred bathroom stall writings (Tzar))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

She’s NOT a slut...she’s a whore. Big difference.


3 posted on 03/07/2012 4:53:01 AM PST by MuttTheHoople (Democrats- Forgetting 9/11 since 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

it was planned and put out there to destroy. In the end, Ms Fluke will be the next Monica Lewinsky.


4 posted on 03/07/2012 4:59:53 AM PST by television is just wrong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
The left has united in this. It may not be one group’s cause, but that group will go all in with the others. The right will not do it. And because of that, the right will lose unless they change


5 posted on 03/07/2012 4:59:53 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

There’s no noble “reproductive right” at stake.

The only right at stake is for irresponsible, psychotic, Progressive men to prove their macho and fill dumpsters with the unwanted humans that result.

IMHO


6 posted on 03/07/2012 5:21:56 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

All of this tempest-in-a-teapot hullbaloo coming from Leftist politicians and their operatives in the media—all the histrionics—all the staged indignation and outrage—the contrived dramatics—the song and dance—it is ALL nothing more than an attempt by the Left to silence Rush Limbaugh.


7 posted on 03/07/2012 5:31:22 AM PST by Savage Beast ("Improving" on truth is contempt for truth: hubris and denial--the stuff of tragedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
The only person who can silence Rush is Rush.

If he isn't worth listening to or is boring or out of touch, his audience will find someplace else to be. (Just ask alFranken.)

It doesn't matter if you are right or wrong; what matters is being entertaining and relevant.

Rush was better when he was younger and hungrier and on the offense. Now after decades of success, he's defending territory and, as someone keeps saying, you don't win defending.

10 posted on 03/07/2012 7:04:07 AM PST by GBA (Natural Born American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen; MuttTheHoople; television is just wrong; Donald Rumsfeld Fan; ripley; Savage Beast; ...

Hey folks .... I sent an e-mail to my local radio station yesterday to thank them for carrying the Rush show because I was certain they were coming under some pressure from the Left. The message I got back was:

“It hasn’t been easy. The opposition is very organized...but thanks.”

I guess I should not have been surprised …. but I was. This is a strong Rush market and I did not expect the station to be coming under as much pressure as this terse reply indicates.

If you are so inclined, PLEASE contact your local Rush radio station and let them know that you support them for carrying Rush. If you have state ‘ping’ lists, let them know this is going on. Enlist the aid of your friends and relatives living in the area …... whatever resources you have to get the message to these beleaguered radio stations, use them!

If you want some interesting if not ‘shocking’ reading on how organized these Leftists are, here’s an article worth reading (it’s a few pages long, please read it all):

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/03/05/rally-for-rush/

Regardless of what you may or may not think of Rush, we CANNOT let the Left win this war and make no mistake, it is a WAR.

We are living in the times described by George Orwell when he said “In an era of universal deceit, the truth is a revolutionary act”. I say: To cower in silence is no longer an option. I know the power of FReepers when they get together and ACT – this is the time to DO something!!!


11 posted on 03/07/2012 7:09:39 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

For starters, we should stop apologizing. Tell them to stuff it. They’re going to call us hateful, bigoted, racist, sexist, xenophobic, evil, etc., anyway, no matter what we do or say, so why do we repeatedly grovel before them?


12 posted on 03/07/2012 7:29:42 AM PST by Nea Wood (When life gets too hard to stand, kneel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen
"...mandating Americans subsidize the sexual habits of women"

No, this is about forcing the Catholic Church to pay for abvortions--nothing less.

15 posted on 03/07/2012 8:25:31 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IbJensen

“Tolerance is only a virtue for their views.”

But, by definition tolerance only exists for that which is objectionable or disagreeable to you. It is not really “tolerance” at all when it is your own views.

So they value tolerance in their opposition but do not see it as a good virtue to hold themselves. Interesting contortion of logic.


16 posted on 03/07/2012 8:36:09 AM PST by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson