Breaking News: Obama's Attorney In Georgia Ballot Challenge Refuses To Appear At Hearing

[little jeremiah]

By the way, anyone know what nationality the name Malihi implies?

---

Sounds Hawaiian to me. I lived there for years.

[MagnoliaB]

That's what I thought too. Allegations haven't proven to be baseless anywhere. They have just been blocked from being heard.

[Godebert]

By the way, anyone know what nationality the name Malihi implies?

Sounds Hawaiian to me. I lived there for years.

It does sound Hawaiian. I think it is Israeli though.

[A_Niceguy_in_CA]

"I just clicked on the links you posted to the ins.gov web-site. One link has been taken down. None of the others contain the term “natural born.”. If these are changes that occurred on a government website in the last several hours, we should all be quite disturbed. I have never been a conspiracy theorist, but a chill is running up my spine.

Those INS links were published just yesterday by Leo Donofrio. The Article I'd posted was his blog also posted yesterday.

[A_Niceguy_in_CA]

I still see the three natural-born citizen references from the INS document in my chrome browser this afternoon.

http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-45104/0-0-0-48602.html

[Plummz]

Great observation, FJ!!!

"It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website."

Notice the parsing of words? "The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth (whose?) there." Notice that Jablonski says very carefully that the pResident made "documents" available. Nowhere in this statement does Jablonski say that the "documents" made available are the same as what the State of Hawaii produced, even though he (Jablonski) disingenuinely tries to suggest such, by surrounding the statement with references to the Full Faith and Credit language. Busted!

[LucyT]

Thanks, Plummz.

[hoosiermama]

all depends on what the meaning of “documents” is.

[hoosiermama]

I’ve been thinking the same thing. Put it in Google and see what come up before this case was filed.

[autumnraine]

So if he has them to put on whitehouse.gov, why not just turn them in to the court?

That’s the worst about all of this. How many of us would be allowed to hand a court a URL scan as evidence?

[snowsislander]

Just this once, or any time, I’d like to hear a judge say: “Mr. Jablonski, I am not compelled by your arguments or your authorities to dismiss this case. None of the cases and rules you cited force me to make such a ruling. On the other hand, we denizens of the courts - lawyers, judges, journalists and the like - love to talk about assuring citizens “access to the courts”. One of the hallmarks of a free society is the right to have your plea heard in a legitimate legal dispute and to have it adjudicated in accordance with a transparent set of rules that apply equally to everyone. On that basis, and considering that no court has seen fit to do so before, I am ruling that this case should be heard on the merits. I realize that I will be targeted for ridicule and calumny, but that is no reason for me to shirk my duty to follow the law and to let an undecided issue of vital importance to be heard.” So Ordered.

I can dream, can’t I?

It appears that we will get to see how close to your dream this situation will play out.