Skip to comments.Self-defense shootings to get closer scrutiny
Posted on 01/24/2012 1:21:56 PM PST by marktwain
An increasing number of intruders in St. Louis are being gunned down by homeowners, due in part to a 2007 self-defense law known as the castle doctrine. But now, authorities are changing how they review apparent justifiable homicide cases.
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
One would think that the number of intruders would be decreasing...
“The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported that there were seven fatal shootings involving the castle doctrine in the city in 2011, up from two the previous year.”
Sounds more like statistical noise here.
“Intruders” are in the home. Are they there for a surprise party?
“An increasing number of intruders in St. Louis are being gunned down by homeowners, due in part to a 2007 self-defense law known as the castle doctrine. But now, authorities are changing how they review apparent justifiable homicide cases.”
Or rather, “An increasing number of Negro intruders in St. Louis are (sic.) being gunned down by white homeowners, due in part to a 2007 self-defense law known as the castle doctrine. But now, Negro authorities are changing how they review apparent justifiable homicide cases to protect Negro criminals and allow harassment of white victims.”
Nothing racist here, by gum.
In somebodies home.....Uninvited.....Homeowner fearful for their life.....
What’s to review?
7 isn’t a huge crisis.
Unless the dead person was known to the homeowners in some fashion, there is nothing to review.
Criminals shouldn't have to fear for their lives while pursuing their chosen trade.
“apparent justifiable homicide”???
You break in, you get blasted. You shouldn’t need a special law to give you permission.
Our county DA in Topeka, KS has been very good about not even giving it a second thought. Too many home invasions to second guess people.
this must be affecting to voter rolls of the Democrat party in some way. Perhaps St. Louis Democrats need to work on developing a better Chicago-style graveyard constituency and then this won’t be a problem.
Well now, that last example in the article, where “somebody” recounted clear murder of an intruder who had submitted and was standing against the wall, unarmed, is a bit of a stretch.
Ya, I know he broke in, but he was no longer a threat and could have been held for police.
This is different than shooting while he’s in the act of breaking in.
the law was instituted to prevent exactly this
the law was put in place to prevent EXACTLY this type of game.
Home invasion is a felony and that does not stop criminals.
They have to get tough with people who actually defend their rights.
Can’t allow too much of THAT in America.
Lord knows the liberals at any level are going to side with the intruder and make them the "victim".
In the past,
police detectives and homicide unit supervisors who thought a killing was justified would contact the circuit attorney’s office to make sure prosecutors agreed.
every case will be scrutinized in a more formal review by the St. Louis circuit attorney’s office.
Doesn’t sound like much of a change.
“One would think that the number of intruders would be decreasing...”
It IS decreasing, one by one.
You break into my home, I shoot (castle doctrine state). I feared for my life! End of story.
You forgot “I’m having chest pains”....
St. Louis city has a long and poor record on the 2nd Amendment. The rats in charge will do what they can to discourage self defense - including making an example out of a crime victim who shot a perp if they can get away with it.
It's not as though one has time to conduct a thorough study of the situation.
How many home owners were lost under that doctrine?
I have a CCW and carry every day all day.
I believe in the castle doctrine.
However, you are correct about the woman in the last example. The BG had given up.
It is obvious that she knows nothing about guns and had no instruction at all or she would not have needed the guy with her to hold the gun for her and help her aim it.
He is the one who should be prosecuted. She should pay a lesser penalty.
No presstitute bias there, nope, none ...
Just another example of why the newspaper is called The St Louis Post-Disgrace.
I feared for my life.
Here’s the evidence (especially if something important rolled behind or out of view).
I need my attorney.
I will file a statement with my attorney. And press charges if the scum is still somehow alive.
St. Louis homeowners gunning down Holder’s “peeples” breaking into homes is the right thing to do to make a polite society. Seven is not enough.
consider the source.
As long as they take the exact same approach for POLICE INVOLVED SHOOTINGS. Arrest Every Cop that ever fires his Gun and force them to defend themselves, JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE, Then I would agree with this idea.
“Just another example of why the newspaper is called The St Louis Post-Disgrace.”
When I lived in St. Louis we called in Pravda West.
Their motto: “We have more socialists per square foot than the Politburo.”
On Sunday morning you had to get there before the sun came up to get a copy. As the years when along they sold fewer and fewer copies of both.
About 15 years ago they stopped selling them. I say about 15 years ago because I got tired of the party line and decided they were both a waste of money when it came to unbiased reporting.
During the same time period the local Gannet owned daily newspaper, The Springfield News-Loser has shrunk to not much larger than a postage stamp.
Thank heavens for the Internet !
“I feared for my life. I want a lawyer. I feared for my life, I want a lawyer.”
I better write that down, just in case.
Although I evaluate the odds of my hovel being invaded as minimal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.