Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Parley Baer

>Conservatism wins every time.

How is it conservative to vote for a three times married man who supported cap and trade, profited from Fannie/Freddie, and is pro amnesty?


26 posted on 01/21/2012 9:09:48 AM PST by CitizenReporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: CitizenReporter

With all due respect, who do you support, and how about you spend your time explaining to readers why.

M’kay?

You’re just whining.


29 posted on 01/21/2012 9:14:30 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (ROMNEY / ALINSKY 2012 (sarcasm))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter
How is it conservative to vote for a three times married man who supported cap and trade, profited from Fannie/Freddie, and is pro amnesty?

Once Rick Santorum drops out of the race (which should probably happen Monday) it might be time for you to stop trashing Newt here on FR.

35 posted on 01/21/2012 9:15:40 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter

Churchill and Reagan had divorces.

Chamberlain and Hitler... were as pure as the wind driven snow.


38 posted on 01/21/2012 9:16:17 AM PST by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter

He wins the debates and that is what is most important this election! Go Newt. He will have Obama peeing in his pants. I am convinced that Newt could come out and have sex with 3 woman in front of the media and everyone would still be voting for him. We need to get rid of Obama PERIOD!!!! He would destroy our country to shreds if he gets in another term. This is a life and death election.


63 posted on 01/21/2012 9:34:53 AM PST by napscoordinator (Newt MUST win the nomination to get rid of Romney and Obama....Dear God let November 2012 go our way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter

Just checked politifact.com’s site trying to say Gingrich was for cap and trade.

Very weak arguments considering he testified against it in Congress.

He was not in favor of it, so quit lying. What he did say earlier was he could see it maybe combined with some other system (which wasn’t the case with cap and trade as we know it), but it appears he changed his mind on that part as well.


87 posted on 01/21/2012 9:52:57 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter
How is it conservative to vote for a three times married man who supported cap and trade, profited from Fannie/Freddie, and is pro amnesty?

– Newt has made pretty damning testimonies against Cap & Trade. So you're blatantly wrong on this.

– Re: Freddie Mac consulting: $1.6 million paid out to a consulting firm over the course of 10 years is chump change. Further, Freddie Mac has said that Gingrich didn't do anything of substance they believed they could use on their behalf:
"He was expected to provide written material that could be circulated among free-market conservatives in Congress and in outside organizations, said two former company executives familiar with Gingrich’s role at the firm. He didn’t produce a white paper or any other document the firm could use on its behalf, they said."
Perhaps because Newt may well have told them exactly what they didn't want to hear?

– And I'm not even sure where you got the idea that Newt is pro-amnesty. He mentioned specifically that he wants to deal the border by 2014 by any means necessary, increase deportations, and that any existing immigrants who've been here 20+ years would have to apply for citizenship or go home.
91 posted on 01/21/2012 9:56:20 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State | Gingrich 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter
How is it conservative to vote for a three times married man who supported cap and trade, profited from Fannie/Freddie, and is pro amnesty?

Because he's our prodigal son.

127 posted on 01/21/2012 10:31:30 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (EWT OR oBAMA??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter
How is it conservative to

What would you know about conservatism, newbie? So far, from your posts, you rate "0". So you must be a mittbot or a barrybacker.
150 posted on 01/21/2012 11:17:10 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter

Newt Gingrich owned a consulting company and had a contract with Freddie Mac. He worked on contract for about 6 years and earned about $250,000 per year. Freddie Mac chose to terminate the contract.

Quite bluntly, he got his money the old fashioned way - he earned it!

As a small child he witnessed his father beating and abusing Newt’s mother. She divorced him, remarried, and Newt was adopted by his step dad. Later he was sexually molested by a high school teacher. Yeah, the first wife he married because she became pregnant and he felt obligated. Today, such women would go to prison as sexual predators.

The story about his second wife, Marianne Ginther, has been in the news lately. They were married 18 years and serperated twice, the final time for six years before admitting defeat and asking for a divorce.

This man was carrying a troubled emotional burden while serving in Congress but he sought counseling, joined AA and eventually turned his life around after a religious conversion.

And you denigrate him?

What I’ve found shocking is the enormous number of so-called Christians here at Free Republic who are nothing of the sort.

Christians are not better than other people. They forgive others, ask forgiveness for themselves, and try to lead a better life by not sinning further. I’m not disgusted with Newt Gingrich, who I believe has honestly changed his life. I’m disgusted with the bigots who claim they are Christian but do not put it into daily practice.

“...After only four years with his Party still in power, his own members forced him out...”

Oh yeah, and many of those Republicans are still in Congress. They are part of the ongoing problem of business as usual in Washignton, D.C. Under a Republican president, they added over $3 trillion to the federal deficit, shunned conservative policy in favor of Beltway influence-peddling, and so damaged the GOP brand that we lost the majority Gingrich had worked years to forge. They’re no doubt pooping in their silk panties at the thought of Newt Gingrich as President, for he has stated repeatedly that he intends to change Washington, D.C.

Do you really think I give a damn that Newt’s fabulous colleagues think his reemergence would be a disaster for Republicans? No. The elections of 2010 were NOT a merit promotion; the Republicans were the only alternative in town!

Washington is broken, it doesn’t work the way it is supposed to and Newt said, if elected, he will work to change the way Washington does business. You better believe the elitists who suck money off of government contracts are terrified he will be elected.

He knows where the bodies are buried.

He knows where the skeletons are hidden.

He knows about the hidden tract ways and byways by which influence peddling moves.

When a middle-class citizen is elected to Congress and returns home 20 years later a multi-millionaire, it is due to corruption in government.

Newt Gingrich has not advocated blanket amnesty for illegal aliens. He will enforce our immigration laws, complete the fence, and strengthen our border defenses. The immdediate result will be million of illegal aliens self-deporting as has happened before.

What you perceive as amnesty is actually our already existing laws being enforced. An illegal alien from Mexico married to a U.S. citizen for 25 years with children born in the U.S. and registered as U.S. citizens, will have a high probability of receiving preferential treatment by INS. If that person is deported s/he will be returning shortly because of having U.S. relatives. It is the way the laws work.

Two married illegal aliens with children born in the U.S. - that is a differnt matter. Families should be kept together and all members deported, period.

Nothing you will say, which I believe is biased and flat-out wrong, has any effect on my belief that Newt Gingrich is the only candidate with true leadership ability who can and will change Washington, D.C. He isn’t perfect. Who is? But I believe at this time, at this juncture in our nation’s history, he can lead this country away from the abyss of socialism and economic collapse.


155 posted on 01/21/2012 11:27:17 AM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: CitizenReporter

“How is it conservative to vote for a three times married man”

It seems to me that Newt got an annulment and married his wife in the church. That means his previous marriages were declared invalid. He’s married to his first (current) wife. The first two, in the eyes of the Church (GOD) never happened.


159 posted on 01/21/2012 11:43:17 AM PST by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson