Ron Paul's Delusional And Passively Narcissistic Worldview

It amazes me how willingly Ron Paul chooses to ignore the truth about the world in which we live and how convinced he and his cult have become of his feigned knowledge of history, culture, and warfare. Of course, if one takes many of Dr. Paul's positions to heart, one might be left to believe that there was no knowledge, history, culture, or warfare until misguided Americans chose to ignore the Constitution of the United States. If one believes Dr. Paul, who has occupied his seat in Congress for over 20 years (such a Washington outsider is he), the Shi'a Twelver theology that drives Iran's present leadership and existed for over 1,000 years before the United States Constitution, would have never been at odds with us were it not for U.S. misgivings since 1953. It seems that Dr. Paul at least acts like he believes that any force or power that has ever held the United States of America anathema has only done so because wayward American leaders fail to channel our Founding Fathers as truly as does the Congressman from Texas and his cult-like following.

One might say that Congressman Paul's worldview is brilliant in its utter simplicity. And simple it is. According to Paul and his followers, we would be left alone by our enemies were it not for the U.S. Navy and Air Force zooming hither and yon in the skies over Muslim countries dropping bombs willy nilly for the following apparent reasons:

Reason Muslims Hate Us So Bad #1) What God fearing military man or U.S. Founding Father despiser doesn't hate Muslim women and children? And that's why peace-loving Muslims want to do things like fly planes into our buildings and develop nuclear weapons to be used against us (and Israel) someday. We all know that before Abraham Lincoln destroyed individual liberty forever in this country and stuff like that, that all pre-Lincoln real Americans just loved Muslims and simply left them alone to pray five times and day and terrorize the high seas, as was their individual right to do. In fact, so respectful was authentic Founding Father Thomas Jefferson's respect for the jihadist raiders of the Barbary Coast. The Barbers claimed jihad, even way back when they loved real Americans like Ron Paul and Mike Church. In fact, after he KICKED THEIR ASS from Algiers to Bizerte and back (which is how one earns the REAL respect of Muslims and their Mujahedeen) the Muslim Barbers presented Founding Father Thomas Jefferson with his very own Qur'an. Oh, and unlike TJ's personal copy of the Bible, Mr. Jefferson didn't snip out all the words that Jesus said from his Qur'an, because the Caliph Uthman and his secretary Thabit already did that 1,200 years earlier! But, I digress with all of this silly pre-U.S. Constitution haters of Jesus and individual liberty and actual history stuff. Just don't tell Dr. Congressman truth seer Ron Paul that the Caliphate and the Muslim Umma had no use for our values even before we kicked their butts in North Africa and in World War I. In fact, Mr. Paul and his cult are going to have to go back a lot further than the age of U.S. Navy and Air Force precision guided munitions to find that men like Usama bin-Laden hated (and still do) what they viewed as the Satanic practice of men creating their own laws (like the U.S. Constitution says we should). In other words, Thomas Jefferson, apparently misunderstood the U.S. Constitution and individual freedom and liberty and also misunderstood all about not getting involved in foreign entanglements, too! In fact, Ben Franklin, John Adams, and George Washington must have misunderstood the whole foreign entanglements thing, too, because they got the foreign French and Germans involved in our domestic entanglement with the Brits, who were foreign, sort of. All that said, I must get back on the rails and surrender to the New History of the World According to Ron Paul and Mike Church that Muslims never had anything against us until we bombed them first and refused to leave their lands like Usama bin-Laden (official spokesman for all Muslims worldwide) ordered us to do.

Oh, and Shi'a Muslims had nothing but the very highest regard for Constitution-loving Americans until the unconstitutional CIA helped knock off Iranian President Mossadeq in 1953 and install Reza Shah Pahlavi, both of whom were equally hated by the rising Shi'ite Theologian, the mullah Ruholla Khomenei (given, but never really having earned the title, Ayatollah). Yeah, that's a little darling of a factoid that deep thinking Beltway Iran think-tankers and other mile-wide, inch-deep analysts just love to whip our to show their "depth" of knowledge about Iran by quoting and re-quoting the little "meddling in Iranian affairs" ditty about Mossadeq. Of course, when compared to the majority of Americans who know little-to-nothing of Iranian culture and history before the evil and unconstitutional CIA came along and started "meddling," the Mosaddeq-1953 ditty makes re-quoters like Dr. Mr. Congressman Paul sound like they're super knowledgeable about foreign events and culture upon requoting the requoters. After all, Dr. Paul can re-quote book jacket data about events that go back as far as 1953! And that's just about why all the Shi'a in Iran (and maybe Iraq) hate us so bad. All those Sunni Muslims hate us because we've been bombing them and quartering troops in their homes evil-Brit pre-Revolutionary-War-style. And we know that's why they all really hate us, because Ron Paul says so and he's a Dr. who's delivered 4,000 babies and has been an outsider in Congress for over 20 years (plus he looks 120 years old), so he must know what he's talking about! Just ask his followers.

Reason Muslims Hate Us So Bad #2) Brainwashed and misdirected, U.S. Constitution misunderstanding U.S. Air Force and U.S. Naval Officers need some decent and adequately sexy stories to tell at bars and O-Clubs to pick up chicks the world over. What better way to generate testosterone-laden tales of badness than to go drop a few precision-guided munitions on Muslim women and children and skedaddle on back to the O-Club in time for happy hour!

Reason Muslims Hate Us So Bad #3) We NEED to make Muslims hate us because ever since the Soviet Union dissolved into a big field of peace, milk, honey and daisies, our evil, profiteering defense contracting industry ran out of evil commies to combat with airplanes, ships, tanks and bombs. Therefore, in the world according to Ron Paul and Mike Church, the U.S. defense department and their co-conspirators in the defense contracting industry, warmongers and imperialists like me NEED enemies and wars the world over to keep the weapons and dollars (for oil and, in Ron Paul's case anyway, Jews I suppose) flowing like the Gulf of Mexico into New Orleans' 9th Ward after Hurricane Katrina.

And soooooo.... if it just weren't for 1-3 above and if the United States would just go all the way back to the way we were before World War II, or maybe just after WWII, when we seemed to be loved everywhere in the Muslim and Third World that National Geographic sent photographers, then the world according to Ron Paul and Mike Church would be damned near perfect. That is, if it weren't for the FACT that for approximately 1,400 years before we beat the Ottoman Empire into submission in World War I, Mr. Paul's peace-loving Muslims were invading, burning, murdering, beheading, marauding, occupying, and forcing capitulation in the name of God from Mecca, to Cadiz and China and back. You know, Mr. Paul, the activity in the preceding paragraph was taking place in huge volumes for 1,200 years before there was a U.S. Constitution and in the mind, heart, and belly of the Muslim world for 1,400 years before Mike Church made a cartoon about the Constitution (a Constitution that I'm curious to know if he's ever raised a hand to support and defend... and I'm not interested to hear if he would if the world were just the way he wanted it, or maybe if it were the Confederate Constitution...) "If at first you don't secede, try, try again." Isn't that what you always say, King Dude? To "what" would you secede, King Dude? France? Or, post-Louisiana-Purchase Louisiana?

I am quite frankly mystified by people, including Satellite Radio talk show host, Mike Church (who makes cartoons about a Constitution he's never shown the courage to defend, under the guise, I suppose, that we fight nothing but illegal wars that generate our just desserts when Islamic militants fly fully loaded, fuel laden passenger jets into our iconic buildings killing thousands of our own, and other, citizens). Rather than feel ashamed of earning the ire of Americans like me for their Code Pink-like mores, they are, I am quite certain, proud of the reaction they get from our warrior-class of citizen. People like this guy, who's done little other than talk about stuff and make cartoons, and thousands of others, then are delusional enough to post on Facebook that members of the U.S. military "overwhelmingly" support the worldview of Ron Paul. False. I am an actual career Naval Officer. You, Mr. Church? Whence comes these scientific statistics that give cause to the use of words like "overwhelmingly?" I am an actual evil defense contractor, Mr. Church, and I work with military members and past members of every rank and branch and my daily contact indicates that military members "overwhelmingly" find Dr. Paul's worldview insane, despite the emotionally charged content in the video you chose to post on Facebook the other day.

Mr Paul and (people like) Mr. Church believe mistakenly that the ONLY reason Iran wants a nuclear weapon is because they feel threatened by the military stances of Israel and the U.S. -- they could not be more off base. Iran feels threatened by the U.S. and Israel by the VERY EXISTENCE of the two freely democratic states and "little "r"' republics. They are, BY THEIR VERY EXISTENCE, anathema to the goals and end state Iran believes it must arrive at, not from a "rational state actor" standpoint, but from a theological and (in theological terms) and apocalyptic standpoint according to the apocalyptic dogma of Shi'a Islam. Mr. Paul says that his solution to Iran's desires for the Greater Middle East and the world -- his corrective measure, if you will -- is as follows: "Well, I would be their friend." Let me tell you something you don't understand, Mr. Paul; Iran does not want to be your friend. You, Sir, are anathema to everything for which the Islamic Revolutionary Government of Iran stands. All of your talk of (one of the areas about which I myself become conflicted about you, because I AGREE) of individual freedom and liberty, could not be further from the very meaning of Islam itself, especially the organic apocalyptic view held by Iran's present day leadership. To the people whom you claim to desire friendship, Sir, to espouse individual freedom and liberty and the natural rights of man, is Satanic. You will never be their friend, Sir, and they will never be yours. If the latter somehow becomes a goal of a Ron Paul Presidency, then your presidency would be sunk in a morass of Iranian mastery of manipulation, debate, semantics, argumentation, and obfuscation that would leave you wishing for better days, like when you were studying organic chemistry in pre-med. As for you, Mr. Church, you should go to Iran -- or ANYWHERE in the Middle East (have you even been?) -- and just try your hand at buying a couple of rugs in a rug souk. Like most Westerners who do so, you might drive what you consider to be a hard bargain and walk away with a couple of rugs under your arm believing you had the merchant at your mercy, having talked him down more than half (twice!) on his asking price. You will never get the best of the people of this region and you will never be their friend. Fact. But, you can still do business with them, provided it is NEVER done from the foundation that you believe they will:

3) Respect a man who puts anything before his own family, faith, and country. Such a man CANNOT be trusted... and that's the goin' in position.

Maybe you will "get it" someday, but I am not hopeful. Too important to you is the cult-like following you have amassed and the wholesale mind meld you have all entered into. I have heard callers into Mr. Church's show ask if there is ANYTHING about Mr. Paul with which he disagrees. He cannot, without great struggle, bring himself to find a single thing. That in itself, is troubling and is a pandemic among Mr. Paul's followers.

Mr. Paul claims that Iran, like the former Soviet Union (who had 3,000 nuclear weapons... now, as Russia, the former Soviet State possesses thousands of nukes), would not use their nuclear weapons against us... again, JUST LIKE the Soviet Union did not. Well, the Soviet Union was, relatively speaking, a rational state actor that had no real desire to destroy what they one day intended to occupy. With Iran, we are dealing with a completely different animal. They believe that the Mahdi and God are going to "heal" everything, so IT DOESN'T MATTER if they nuke us and Israel. If it happens, it was GOD'S WILL, not Iran’s actions or Mr. Paul's failure to stop them, that caused it to happen. The Soviet Union, on the other hand, was completely secular/Godless in their calculus.

NO ONE in the actual business of war, loves war, Mr. Paul, but the United States Military is the most formidable military forces in the history of the world, and it HAS TO BE. While we may not need hundreds of military bases the world over, neither do we want to revisit the days of the pre-World War II era where we had no global presence at all; where millions of lives were shed, one could say, because of our absence in Europe and Asia. Europe was stabilized and shielded in relative peace, as was Asia, for three-quarters of a century because of that presence. If you believe that the result would have been the same, or better, without our presence abroad, then you are not only delusional, but the sum of all your simple brilliance has been rendered stupid.

Ron Paul supports legal dope and prostitution
http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/05/06/Ron_Paul_on_Prostitution_Gay_Marriage/
Starts half way in the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Mz9pDGHBTo&feature=related

Nevada prostitutes endorse Ron Paul
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/06/nevada-prostitutes-endorse-ron-paul/

White supremecist David Duke endorses Ron Paul;
http://patdollard.com/2011/12/former-kkk-grand-wizard-david-duke-says-he%E2%80%99s-voting-for-ron-paul/

Ron Paul refuses to disavow STORMFRONT associations
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/45537/ron-paul-refuses-to-disavow-stormfront-other-anti-semitic-racist-groups-openly-campaigning-for-him/

Ron Paul SUPPORTS NAMBLA
http://videosift.com/video/Does-Ron-Paul-Support-NAMBLA-Well-yes-and-no
http://www.dailypaul.com/70100/age-of-consent?page=1

Why do the Ron Paul guys support gay marriage?
http://www.queerty.com/ron-paul-on-gay-marriage-20071210/

the 2008 RONULAN economic advisor to Ron paul saying that libertarians need to infiltrate the GOP
Libertarians need to infiltrate the GOP

VIDEO of Schiff saying just that!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ncLTFoTFa8

An organization called Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth video taped an inpromtu appearance with Ron Paul and recorded some of his comments. They can be found

here:
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/

While Ron Paul has said on TV shows such as Glen Beck that he dismisses the major theories, he openly says there is a coverup of what went on yet refuses to

elaborate on just what is covered up. The 9/11 Comission clearly showed that intelligence failures happened because of Clinton era laws that prevented our

inteligence agancies from communicating with each other.

On the website CONSPIRACY PLANET, information about Ron Paul and issues similar to this can be found:
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?ChannelID=90

Ron Paul has publically said that the CIA has accomplished a coup against America and needs to be taken out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dECSYm5bSM

A direct quote from this conference is as such:
(January 20, 2010) House Rep. Ron Paul says the CIA has in effect carried out a “coup” against the US government, and the intelligence agency needs to be

“taken out.”

Speaking to an audience of like-minded libertarians at a Campaign for Liberty regional conference in Atlanta this past weekend, the Texas Republican said:

“There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIA coup. The CIA runs everything, they run the military. They’re the ones who are over there lobbing missiles

and bombs on countries...”

Additional video proof of him saying this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SZKLvEOp9c

And here is one prominant website that supports the 9/11 conspiracy theories, calling for a RON PAUL PROVISIONAL ARMY to take over after we investigate the

9/11 events:
http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/

Among the other kooky connections to Ron Paul, is a UFO COnnection. I have yet to find the original article, but numerous articles repeat the belief of Ron

Paul’s that UFO’s are real. Some of the Ron Paul sites have soeone trying to mock this belief, but the Ron Paul site, DailyPaul.com says this:
http://dailypaul.com/node/125999

This has been repeated again in San Francisco, not known to support conservatives or Libertarians anyways, but associated with Ron Paul out there were UFO

enthusiasts mentioned in this article:
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2007/08/ron_pauls_ufo_sighter_friends.php

How is it that the kookiest ideas are surrounding Ron Paul? Ron Paul, UFO disclosure, etc... simply nothing more than a pacifier — a distraction!
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message462483/pg1

Ron Paul supported by anti-war group CODE PINK
http://www.dailypaul.com/165272/anti-war-group-code-pink-counts-ron-paul-in-their-camp-on-israel-aid-opposition
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/18/rep-paul-codepink-camp-israel-aid-opposition/

Ron Paul and his acolytes are following George Soros on the defense of our nation, and connections between the two have been proved
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/01/02/ron-pauls-soros-defense-plan/

Tehran TV LOVES Ron Paul!

http://www.aim.org/special-report/tehran-tv-loves-ron-paul/

Ron Paul supported by anti-war group CODE PINK
http://www.dailypaul.com/165272/anti-war-group-code-pink-counts-ron-paul-in-their-camp-on-israel-aid-opposition

Glenn Beck exposes Ron Paul’s ties to Soros. Does it shock you, or does it do much to explain why Ron Paul is friendly with “Bawney” Frank and almost as bad

as Obama is when it comes to illegal aliens and Islam? Listen to video please.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFSHGhq19CM

Dennis Prager point sout Ron Paul’s lunacy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qqHAoXRVk4g

Ron Paul says he is against the NDAA bill, so why didn’t he VOTE AGAINST it??
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/06/ron-paul-supporters-claim-he-opposes-the-ndaa-so-why-didnt-he-vote-on-it/

Ron Paul supporters quizzed on the Constitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISuQAdKWuR8&feature=g-all-u&context=G2591ab9FAAAAAAAACAA

As homosexual Army soldier Bradley Manning’s treason trial continues at Fort Meade, Maryland, the support he has received from Republican presidential

candidate Ron Paul has been curiously ignored by the major media, now touting Paul as someone who could win the January 3 Iowa Republican Caucuses. Paul has

called Manning, a crossdresser with acknowledged mental problems, a “hero” and “patriot” for stealing government secrets and providing them to WikiLeaks.
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/2011/12/21/kincaid-ron-paul-says-accused-traitor-is-a-patriot/

While campaigning in Iowa on Wednesday, Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul praised the Occupy Wall Street movement, comparing it to the Tea Party

movement. “In many ways, I identify with both groups,” Paul said. Both groups are fed up with problems in Washington and “the two-party-system,” Paul said

while speaking at an insurance company in Des Moines. Praising the left-wing Occupy Wall Street movement is an unusual move for a Republican presidential

candidate, but Ron Paul is, of course, an unusual Republican presidential candidate. He jumped to first place in the Iowa caucus polls partly because of

support from people who aren’t Republicans. His comments that members of the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street are unhappy with the “two-party system” could

fuel speculation that Paul will make a third-party bid of his own—something he has not ruled out.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/ron-paul-praises-occupy-wall-street_614967.html

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.