[xzins]

I have also read that Paul refused to return a gift from White Supremacists in the last election cycle.

[svcw]

I just do not see how anyone can support this man.
He is a phoney constitutionalists, anti-Israel lunatic.

[xzins]

I had not realized that Ron Paul was in the anti-Israel camp alongside Pat Buchanen.

This is a necessary article to forward to anyone you know from Iowa.

[Quix]

Thanks

imho,

people who think that Ron Paul would be a savior from the globalists are . . . terminally ignorant.

[ontap]

It’s time for this fool to go!!

[LIBERTARIAN JOE]

Yes, back in '82, when the Israeli army was about to suffer many casualties by entering Beirut and destroying the PLO, which they had trapped there, it was St. Ron Reagan that negotiated the deal to allow them to flee to Tripoli. The joo-hating Ron Paul was the only republican in DC to stand up on the House floor and criticize that deal.

Thanks to Reagan and the 800 US Marines sent there to escort the PLO to safety, Ron Paul didn't get his wish to see the Israelis suffer all those combat losses. And, as a bonus, the Israelis and the rest of the world got to enjoy yassir arafat's "good works" for another 22 years.

In the same vein, Ron Paul was about the only republican politician to criticize the US (Reagan again) UN vote to condemn Israel's attack on the Iraqi reactor. I guess his reasoning, him being a joo-hater and all, was that if we didn't condemn Israel for attacking perceived threats to their security, they'd use their military more often, thus taking more casualties.

[marty60]

Here’s a vid for you Paul.

hehehe

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTXiBGLloV4&feature=related

[xzins]

Ping to little discussed Ron Paul info.

[runninglips]

It amazes me how easily people are frightened away from voting, and towards tyranny.

Foreign aid should be given to NO NATION, they either live or die on their own. Foreign entanglements will be the death of our nation, and a constant state of war is the result of the interventionists within both Democrat and Republican ranks. Has anyone noticed, that we have spent ourselves into bankruptcy, "defending liberty" around the world?

Pat Buchanans thesis was that our interfering in WW I was undue interference, and was the direct cause of WW II. That point is inarguable. If we let the idiots in Europe spend themselves into oblivion, and die in the trenches for centuries, I couldn't have cared less. The U.S. choosing sides, and "quickly ending" it, actually has led to war without end, with OUR sons and daughters now the fodder. WW II, was simply the result of us choosing sides against Germany, and allowing OUR FRIENDS, to apply sanctions against THEIR ENEMY. This war on terror, is also a joke. We attack Iran, and Afghanistan, when those who caused it were wearing Saudi robes. Again, we are setting up another war, which will directly result from these interventions.

Trade with everyone, talk to all, and defend our shores with extreme violence, what is isolationist about that?

In case any of you have forgotten, the nation created by MAN called Israel, is a sovereign nation. It was not instituted by a miraculous Exodus from Egypt, it came into being by a vote of the U.N., which most on this forum hate. Either it can take care of itself, or it deserves to be in the ash heap of history. No amount of support, financial or military, will keep it alive one day longer than it deserves to be, or God himself wants it to be. For those of you that believe God himself wants Israel protected, let the Israeli's turn to IAM, and let Him fight their battles? He has said He would, why are we artificially propping them up, and taking His place?

In short, to equate Pat Buchanan, or Ron Paul to Nazis and White supremacists, is nothing more than a repetition of propaganda, designed to keep the trillion dollar heist of our wallets ongoing, and worse, the theft of lives of so many of our best and brightest never ending. Ron Paul is not an isolationist, but he does put Americas interests first, in a different manner than the war parties will accept. For that reason, and that reason is enough, he must be destroyed. If his views were to be allowed to grow, some very rich and powerful people, would lose out. Trillions are truly at stake, and immense power. The power to literally rule the world, it is as simple as that.

If we vote for Obama, Gingrich or Romney, SSDD, and we deserve nothing more. For us to have any hope of dodging the coming collapse, if that is even possible, and a perpetual state of war, the only choice is Ron Paul. Sorry, but there is no other that stands with Liberty, for U.S. Just remember, the next "global cop" will most likely be wearing a PRC uniform, after we no longer can afford the "honor" of doing that job.

[Karliner]

Ron Paul= Jihadist for president, one step above hope and change, Alinsky, isolationism ansd the destruction of the rest of America as it once was, a vote for him is like, like a vote for Ho ho ho Chi Minh, a vote for the Khmai Rouge, a vote for Pol Pot, a vote for Stalinm, a vote for Chairman Mao and his 63 million dead in just one decade, a vote for Hitler, anyone that doesn’t agree TO THE GULAGs you swine!

[mas cerveza por favor]

Occasionally Paul switches gears and points out that a cutoff in foreign aid would be good for Israel. That may well be the case. I believe that and so do quite a few people who support Israel.

Greenfield endorses Ron Paul's proposed Israeli aid cutoff?

[VeniVidiVici]

As much of a whack job that Ron Paul is you certainly have to admit that with him he lays it all out on the table for all to see.

[algernonpj]

I had not realized that Ron Paul was in the anti-Israel camp ...

Before you all jump to conclusions. He isn't.

Something didn't seem quite kosher (pardon the pun) about this article so I tracked back the first two links:

It’s the man who called Israel, “an aggressive, national socialist state”

...the solicitation letter which ...

I have downloaded a few of the pdfs' referenced in the second link and read them.(it's going slowly slow because I'm bandwidth challenged). It seems the New Republic has published a skewed anti-Paul article which in turn was used as unchallenged reference material by Daniel Greenfield.

Link and read for yourself.

Then read this interview carefully.

Remember Ron Paul does not do sound bites well, perhaps except for:"I define foreign aid as taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries."

[cookcounty]

I wish just ONE reporter or media person would ask him about his positions regarding Israel, Iran and the middle east. What a bunch of slackers. Even Hannity won’t so it.