To: reefdiver
he’s right.
Cain was and is a lightweight. Dangerously stupid on all things political.
To: Hammerhead
Cain was and is a lightweight. Dangerously stupid on all things political.
So you support Newt, right?
Why would anyone value your opinion when you back such an ethically, morally, and issue-position challenged loser of a candidate such as Newt?
To: Hammerhead
another one, start listing your achievements.
17 posted on
12/03/2011 12:03:52 PM PST by
reefdiver
("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
To: Hammerhead
That’s silly. Cain has been involved in and engaged in politics for at least two decades. He was on tv in 1993 challenging Clinton on live tv over socialized healthcare. This charge is bogus.
26 posted on
12/03/2011 12:23:48 PM PST by
ilgipper
(Everything you get from the government was taken from someone else)
To: Hammerhead
Cain was and is a lightweight. Dangerously stupid on all things political.Yeah buddy!
Those heavyweight smart politicians have really done well by us in the past, haven't they!
34 posted on
12/03/2011 12:35:10 PM PST by
Las Vegas Ron
(Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
To: Hammerhead
Cain was and is a lightweight. Dangerously stupid on all things political.I seriously doubt you come close to his intellect and leadership ability. I find politicians dangerously stupid on running a business. Hence, the appeal of Herman Cain.
To: Hammerhead
It was not the female accusers that led me to back away from Cain, it was other doubts which crept in. It was a disappointment when doubts about his capabilities arose in my mind because I really like Mr. Cain. It is a long time until Super Tuesday and will be interesting to see how things shake out.
62 posted on
12/03/2011 1:38:45 PM PST by
Jukeman
To: Hammerhead
At least he can figure out that there is no such thing as man made global warming. Is this the best you have?
90 posted on
12/04/2011 6:53:04 AM PST by
chilepup
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson