What a bullshit analogy. You are not going to see a million rifle toting Tea Partiers marching. Don’t try to stuff your moral equivalency crap down our throats.
“What a bullshit analogy. You are not going to see a million rifle toting Tea Partiers marching. Don’t try to stuff your moral equivalency crap down our throats.
It wasn’t an analogy. Anyway, you’re entitled to your opinion even if you seem to feel abigkahuna isn’t. But “stuff down our throat”? What’s with that? And what is with the “our”? You don’t speak for us.
Good question, IMO, Abigkahuna.
richardtavor
I think you are mis-interpreting my question. I am not equating the OWS with the Tea party. Although I might like to see the reaction if a million rifle toting tea party members march down the street.
My question is overall, at what point do citizens give up their petition to the government for redress of grievances, When the government tells them to go home? Then if that is the case, then the citizens do not have the right to petition for redress. See my point here? It has nothing to do with moral equivalency of tea party and ows. Take your head out of your suitcase and quit thinking red/blue. Both political parties are the problem and neither one of them is the solution.
Do you think if you pull the handle for red party, or blue party, then magically things will be better? Is Gingrich, Cain, Bachman, Perry, Paul, or any of them really going to get rid of government agencies? No.
I’ll bet you a tasty soda drink that come 2014, it will be the same-o, same-o, just a different group of people holding the cocktail parties in Washington.
With that in mind, look at my question again, at what point does the citizenry obey/disobey the government when it tells you to disperse and that your petition will not ever be heard.
+1